vijay wrote:
India must have been a bland place. The Aryans came from Europe, and now our delicacies also came from abroad. The only vegetable that grew here was brinjal and grass for the animals. These studies are not believable and there is a subtle hint of denying Indians credit for being a developed culture before the Europeans discovered her.
I thought on the same lines. I knew we had no civilization before Mughals or Europeans came to this unfortunate country.
Beware historians may chase you.
The historians will only tell me that even the Roti, Chapati, or Fulka (Indian bread) which we always thought was an Indian preparation is originally from Persia or Africa.
http://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/food-wine/food-story-how-indias-favourite-flatbread-roti-was-born/
Very much convinced. How can anybody deny if the facts are there standing before them ? Despite all this even if someone doesn't believe who cares ?
Fact will not become False if somebody says that he doesn't believe
In the same way, the post said Rasgulla and many such foods are from some other countries providing the proof contrary to the popular belief,One has to believe it. If one doesn't how it matters?
I do not trust anything unless I have confirmed proofs. Read this famous professor is saying Bhagat Singh and Azad were terrorists, should I believe him?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Bhagat-Singh-Azad-were-terrorists-says-UK-historian/articleshow/30496595.cms
Labeling Bhagat Singh as a traitor is an old issue and it was never taken seriously. You need not believe such outdated versions from a British Historian.
The one I mentioned was only last year and it's there in an Indian newspaper (the link provided in above box)
Whatever it may be, the title of the link article says it was the view of a British Historian
