Life Sentence or Death Sentence ? - Should terrorists be shown any mercy?

2.9K Views
0 Replies
1 min read
We have some dreaded terrorists languishing in the prison - Abu Salem . Afzal Guru and Ajmal Kasab and of course many others not so (in)famous.
Our government is of course not sure how to punish them and in the bargain spending several crores of rupees just taking care and maintaining them .
There are many people who feel that they should not be given a death sentence since they are just puppets in the hand of those who are calling the shots from across the border.But , at the same time , the deaths were caused by them and they are adults who are able to think for themselves, so why should they not be held responsible for their heinous crimes...
Should they be given death sentence or Life sentence ?

20 Replies

In this particular instance I won't blame any president for it,it's the spinelessness of the head of the government which has exposed us to the ridicule of the world! Here again our the conduct of our ex FM and now President should raise questions. He was part of the powerful think-tank which exhibited this spinelessness! Not a single member of this think-tank staked his or her selfish interest to make it an issue to resign!! These days ministers don't resign on their own unless forced to!
In this particular instance I won't blame any president for it,it's the spinelessness of the head of the government which has exposed to the ridicule of the world! Here again our the conduct of our ex FM and now President should raise questions. He was part of the powerful think-tank which exhibited this spinelessness! Not a single member of this think-tank staked his or her selfish interest to make it an issue to resign!! These days ministers don't resign on their own unless forced to!


Earlier there was a lot of respect attached the post of President..I wonder how things are going to be now ,since Pranab Mukherji is very much part of Sonia Gandhi's yes men like our PM...
If someone is a genuine terrorist, he should be killed at sight. Arrests and court proceedings is not for the devils. Terrorists are devils in human forms.
If someone is a genuine terrorist, he should be killed at sight. Arrests and court proceedings is not for the devils. Terrorists are devils in human forms.


what India is doing in Kasab case, is they think that they could get more and more information about different terrorist.
If someone is a genuine terrorist, he should be killed at sight. Arrests and court proceedings is not for the devils. Terrorists are devils in human forms.


what India is doing in Kasab case, is they think that they could get more and more information about different terrorist.


I doubt if they will get anything much out of Kasab since he has been put through everything possible and they have got some information, which Pakistan as usual says is not evidence or proof that terrorists are hiding in their country ! One can see that Pakistan is at the base of every terror problem we face toady !
If someone is a genuine terrorist, he should be killed at sight. Arrests and court proceedings is not for the devils. Terrorists are devils in human forms.


what India is doing in Kasab case, is they think that they could get more and more information about different terrorist.


I doubt if they will get anything much out of Kasab since he has been put through everything possible and they have got some information, which Pakistan as usual says is not evidence or proof that terrorists are hiding in their country ! One can see that Pakistan is at the base of every terror problem we face toady !


No doubt, the menace of cross border terrorism in India us owing to Pakistan. We need to strictly guard our borders and entry of terrorists to our country. As soon as there is trace of terrorists, immediate commando/ police action is necessary. The need for trial in court must be minimum. It is not possible to avoid delay in judicial process.
In this particular instance I won't blame any president for it,it's the spinelessness of the head of the government which has exposed to the ridicule of the world! Here again our the conduct of our ex FM and now President should raise questions. He was part of the powerful think-tank which exhibited this spinelessness! Not a single member of this think-tank staked his or her selfish interest to make it an issue to resign!! These days ministers don't resign on their own unless forced to!


Yes, its true, its more about the lack of willingness on part of the ruling government to carry out the executions as has been ordered by the court. But if that is the case, then why are those cases forwarded to the President for petitions?? Why go through all these unnecessary steps that only wastes obscene amounts of our money and creates mountains of useless paper? Once the court has given its judgement, just carry out those orders when the proper times comes!!
In this particular instance I won't blame any president for it,it's the spinelessness of the head of the government which has exposed to the ridicule of the world! Here again our the conduct of our ex FM and now President should raise questions. He was part of the powerful think-tank which exhibited this spinelessness! Not a single member of this think-tank staked his or her selfish interest to make it an issue to resign!! These days ministers don't resign on their own unless forced to!


Yes, its true, its more about the lack of willingness on part of the ruling government to carry out the executions as has been ordered by the court. But if that is the case, then why are those cases forwarded to the President for petitions?? Why go through all these unnecessary steps that only wastes obscene amounts of our money and creates mountains of useless paper? Once the court has given its judgement, just carry out those orders when the proper times comes!!


In case of death sentence, the culprit has constitutional right to seek mercy. Mercy petition cannot be summarily rejected. Government has no choice as this is constitutional and legal remedy available to culprit. After receiving mercy petition, the government has to follow the proper procedure viz. getting getting opinion of state government concerned and thereafter sending the petition to President of India with cabinet advice.

Once the terrorist is arrested and presented to court, there is long legal process that cannot be avoided. If the terrorist is killed in action, this would be different.
In this particular instance I won't blame any president for it,it's the spinelessness of the head of the government which has exposed to the ridicule of the world! Here again our the conduct of our ex FM and now President should raise questions. He was part of the powerful think-tank which exhibited this spinelessness! Not a single member of this think-tank staked his or her selfish interest to make it an issue to resign!! These days ministers don't resign on their own unless forced to!


Yes, its true, its more about the lack of willingness on part of the ruling government to carry out the executions as has been ordered by the court. But if that is the case, then why are those cases forwarded to the President for petitions?? Why go through all these unnecessary steps that only wastes obscene amounts of our money and creates mountains of useless paper? Once the court has given its judgement, just carry out those orders when the proper times comes!!


In case of death sentence, the culprit has constitutional right to seek mercy. Mercy petition cannot be summarily rejected. Government has no choice as this is constitutional and legal remedy available to culprit. After receiving mercy petition, the government has to follow the proper procedure viz. getting getting opinion of state government concerned and thereafter sending the petition to President of India with cabinet advice.

Once the terrorist is arrested and presented to court, there is long legal process that cannot be avoided. If the terrorist is killed in action, this would be different.


No attempt should be made to defend the indefensible! No judicial process is pending in Afjal Guru's case. The highest court of the land has pronounced the verdict holding him guilty and punishment too was pronounced. The mercy petition has been gathering dust for years for reasons known to all. It's our horrific record of compromising with crimes and criminals that has landed in our present condition. The fact remains that in most of the terrorist violence,the common people are the worst sufferers and there is a yawning disconnect between the thoughts of common masses and our great rulers.
In this particular instance I won't blame any president for it,it's the spinelessness of the head of the government which has exposed to the ridicule of the world! Here again our the conduct of our ex FM and now President should raise questions. He was part of the powerful think-tank which exhibited this spinelessness! Not a single member of this think-tank staked his or her selfish interest to make it an issue to resign!! These days ministers don't resign on their own unless forced to!


Yes, its true, its more about the lack of willingness on part of the ruling government to carry out the executions as has been ordered by the court. But if that is the case, then why are those cases forwarded to the President for petitions?? Why go through all these unnecessary steps that only wastes obscene amounts of our money and creates mountains of useless paper? Once the court has given its judgement, just carry out those orders when the proper times comes!!


In case of death sentence, the culprit has constitutional right to seek mercy. Mercy petition cannot be summarily rejected. Government has no choice as this is constitutional and legal remedy available to culprit. After receiving mercy petition, the government has to follow the proper procedure viz. getting getting opinion of state government concerned and thereafter sending the petition to President of India with cabinet advice.

Once the terrorist is arrested and presented to court, there is long legal process that cannot be avoided. If the terrorist is killed in action, this would be different.


No attempt should be made to defend the indefensible! No judicial process is pending in Afjal Guru's case. The highest court of the land has pronounced the verdict holding him guilty and punishment too was pronounced. The mercy petition has been gathering dust for years for reasons known to all. It's our horrific record of compromising with crimes and criminals that has landed in our present condition. The fact remains that in most of the terrorist violence,the common people are the worst sufferers and there is a yawning disconnect between the thoughts of common masses and our great rulers.


There is no attempt to say that Govt. had not made undue delay in disposing the mercy petition. I just replied a member as to why mercy petition be entertained at all and the culprit hanged soon after death sentence.
In this particular instance I won't blame any president for it,it's the spinelessness of the head of the government which has exposed to the ridicule of the world! Here again our the conduct of our ex FM and now President should raise questions. He was part of the powerful think-tank which exhibited this spinelessness! Not a single member of this think-tank staked his or her selfish interest to make it an issue to resign!! These days ministers don't resign on their own unless forced to!


Yes, its true, its more about the lack of willingness on part of the ruling government to carry out the executions as has been ordered by the court. But if that is the case, then why are those cases forwarded to the President for petitions?? Why go through all these unnecessary steps that only wastes obscene amounts of our money and creates mountains of useless paper? Once the court has given its judgement, just carry out those orders when the proper times comes!!


In case of death sentence, the culprit has constitutional right to seek mercy. Mercy petition cannot be summarily rejected. Government has no choice as this is constitutional and legal remedy available to culprit. After receiving mercy petition, the government has to follow the proper procedure viz. getting getting opinion of state government concerned and thereafter sending the petition to President of India with cabinet advice.

Once the terrorist is arrested and presented to court, there is long legal process that cannot be avoided. If the terrorist is killed in action, this would be different.


No attempt should be made to defend the indefensible! No judicial process is pending in Afjal Guru's case. The highest court of the land has pronounced the verdict holding him guilty and punishment too was pronounced. The mercy petition has been gathering dust for years for reasons known to all. It's our horrific record of compromising with crimes and criminals that has landed in our present condition. The fact remains that in most of the terrorist violence,the common people are the worst sufferers and there is a yawning disconnect between the thoughts of common masses and our great rulers.


I totally agree with those sentiments ! Indian politicians only look after their interests and nothing else matters . One wonders if they have any national feeling or patriotism left in them...It is disgusting to watch them on TV making excuses for lapses saying 'this is politics and anything is possible ..
Certainly they should get death sentence. They don't have mercy on innocent people why should we have on them?. It should be lesson for others . So that they don't do it in future.
I think Government should not waste much money on kasab and should hang him to death.
I agree that there should be no mercy to the terrorists. But mercy petition is a legal remedy that cannot be denied. We must not mix sentiments with law.
I agree that there should be no mercy to the terrorists. But mercy petition is a legal remedy that cannot be denied. We must not mix sentiments with law.


Sir, if mercy of death sentence is given then, the justice can't be said to those people, who have lost their lives.

The Number of killing was not 1 or 2 but in 50s or 100s.
I agree that there should be no mercy to the terrorists. But mercy petition is a legal remedy that cannot be denied. We must not mix sentiments with law.


Sir, if mercy of death sentence is given then, the justice can't be said to those people, who have lost their lives.

The Number of killing was not 1 or 2 but in 50s or 100s.


I hold that there should be no mercy. But the mercy petition has to be entertained and President's Decision taken. Mercy must not be granted and he must be hanged till death as early as possible.
I agree that there should be no mercy to the terrorists. But mercy petition is a legal remedy that cannot be denied. We must not mix sentiments with law.


Sir, if mercy of death sentence is given then, the justice can't be said to those people, who have lost their lives.

The Number of killing was not 1 or 2 but in 50s or 100s.


I hold that there should be no mercy. But the mercy petition has to be entertained and President's Decision taken. Mercy must not be granted and he must be hanged till death as early as possible.


You mean that it is in the hand of Judge to give mercy or not?
I agree that there should be no mercy to the terrorists. But mercy petition is a legal remedy that cannot be denied. We must not mix sentiments with law.


Sir, if mercy of death sentence is given then, the justice can't be said to those people, who have lost their lives.

The Number of killing was not 1 or 2 but in 50s or 100s.


I hold that there should be no mercy. But the mercy petition has to be entertained and President's Decision taken. Mercy must not be granted and he must be hanged till death as early as possible.


You mean that it is in the hand of Judge to give mercy or not?


No. Judge cannot give mercy. He has to decide the case. Death sentence is given by District and Sessions Judge. This has to be confirmed by High court. After confirmation by High court, convict may appeal to supreme court. If supreme court also upholds death sentence, the convict can submit mercy petition to President. At this stage, Central government obtains views of state government and sends advice to President- whether to give mercy or not. If mercy is refused, the convict will be hanged.

This procedure is compulsory an has to be followed. I think that the terrorists should not be granted mercy and their petitions should be rejected. However, sometime is required by government to deal with mercy petition.
I agree that there should be no mercy to the terrorists. But mercy petition is a legal remedy that cannot be denied. We must not mix sentiments with law.


Sir, if mercy of death sentence is given then, the justice can't be said to those people, who have lost their lives.

The Number of killing was not 1 or 2 but in 50s or 100s.


I hold that there should be no mercy. But the mercy petition has to be entertained and President's Decision taken. Mercy must not be granted and he must be hanged till death as early as possible.


You mean that it is in the hand of Judge to give mercy or not?


No. Judge cannot give mercy. He has to decide the case. Death sentence is given by District and Sessions Judge. This has to be confirmed by High court. After confirmation by High court, convict may appeal to supreme court. If supreme court also upholds death sentence, the convict can submit mercy petition to President. At this stage, Central government obtains views of state government and sends advice to President- whether to give mercy or not. If mercy is refused, the convict will be hanged.

This procedure is compulsory an has to be followed. I think that the terrorists should not be granted mercy and their petitions should be rejected. However, sometime is required by government to deal with mercy petition.


As of now it is in the hands of the President and Pratibha Patil of course had it with her for more than 2 years , and must have been advised by the Congress party supremo to simply wait and watch..they will continue to do even now !
I agree that there should be no mercy to the terrorists. But mercy petition is a legal remedy that cannot be denied. We must not mix sentiments with law.


Sir, if mercy of death sentence is given then, the justice can't be said to those people, who have lost their lives.

The Number of killing was not 1 or 2 but in 50s or 100s.


I hold that there should be no mercy. But the mercy petition has to be entertained and President's Decision taken. Mercy must not be granted and he must be hanged till death as early as possible.


You mean that it is in the hand of Judge to give mercy or not?


No. Judge cannot give mercy. He has to decide the case. Death sentence is given by District and Sessions Judge. This has to be confirmed by High court. After confirmation by High court, convict may appeal to supreme court. If supreme court also upholds death sentence, the convict can submit mercy petition to President. At this stage, Central government obtains views of state government and sends advice to President- whether to give mercy or not. If mercy is refused, the convict will be hanged.

This procedure is compulsory an has to be followed. I think that the terrorists should not be granted mercy and their petitions should be rejected. However, sometime is required by government to deal with mercy petition.


As of now it is in the hands of the President and Pratibha Patil of course had it with her for more than 2 years , and must have been advised by the Congress party supremo to simply wait and watch..they will continue to do even now !


whatever the law is, if i am the president, i won't allow mercy to terrorist.

Topic Author

Topic Stats

Created Friday, 27 July 2012 22:48
Last Updated Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies 0
Views 2.9K
Likes 0

Share This Topic