AAM AADAMI Party is in massive search for honest. They are on recruitment drive. But really honerst are very scarce.

http://news.oneindia.in/india/pics-main-bhi-aam-aadmi-aap-drive-to-hunt-honest-candidates-1371260.html#infinite-scroll-1

They might find it difficult to search hones candidates but their task is not tough. They have to find only one per constituency. If we divide with number of voters it will be around 1.2 million people per seat. Is it that hard to find one honest person out of 1.2 million?

But the 'honest' person may not be eager to join AAP. He may not be efficient or interested in politics. Honest people can work in non political domain as well. Moreover, every honest person may not join AAP. They may join BJP, Congress or Communist as well. The GOA C.M., Tripura C.M., the Pudducheery C.M.- all three are very simple and honest but belong to BJP, Communist and regional party. As a matter of fact, dishonety is not declared policy of any political party. Nobody will say that he is dishonest. It is individuals who choose dishonesty and they may do irrespective of party affiliation. There is no way an AAM AADAMI Party member presumed 'honest' may not turn dishonest.

True. Nobody can foresee the things. Akin to this, nobody can predict if an honest man of today remains honest until tomorrow.

No, we certainly are not going to play a prediction or forecast game but talking about present situation of finding honest people for different political parties.

My intention was, after all parties are made of people and the people in the party whose honesty made an impact and created an impression that a particular party is known for its honest people today may turn out to be dishonest people due to avarice or some other reason. And about this uncertainty i was talking about.

Men can change but not parties, if they wish to remain honest they can always kick dishonest out. That is the only way remaining an honest party, otherwise what is so bad about present system?

All parties as such are honest. Men change. So even dishonest men can replace the honerst and vice versa. The system is certainly not corrupt. The system is as good or bad as that in western countries. It is the national character that makes difference. We should see corruption as a means of exploitation by the powerful. So only the victims viz. the poor can remove corruption. The buraucracy and powerful affluent private parties- the bribe giver and taker both benefit at the cost of poor who have no means to brive. So the poor have to organize to fight corruption. The so called AAM AADAMI as defined by Kejriwal is not poor but includes even the richest industrialists whol bribe or use corruption as a means to get favor that an ordinary poor person- the true AAM AADAMI cannot get.

AAP's success is a shining example for a common mans will to change the exploitation prevailing in the society. Though the composition of AAP includes a few rich people, it doesn't mean that they are against eradication of corruption in the society. It's their common commitment to root out corruption that bound them together.

Actually AAP experience is yet to be seen. Honerst is okay but without clear analysis of corruption- who gains and who loses and who can remove- there can be no success. According to AAP, the common man is one who is not in government service and uncommon or important are those in private. The corrupt bureaucrats gain and honest common men lose. This is perverse thinking of AAP. In fact, it is the so called aam aadami viz. corporate and wealthy persons who gain more from corruption. Just see that the recent announcement of free water led many consumers (who are aam aadami) to approach the meter readers (khas aadami) to get the reading within free limit by tampering. So how we can say that the aam aadami is honest.

again, no political party has agenda of corruption. So if AAP also says that tey are against corruption, it makes no difference. actually AAP can also get men only from same population. Nobody can say that those in AAM will be definitely honest and those in other parties dishonest.

AAM AADAMI Party is in massive search for honest. They are on recruitment drive. But really honerst are very scarce.

http://news.oneindia.in/india/pics-main-bhi-aam-aadmi-aap-drive-to-hunt-honest-candidates-1371260.html#infinite-scroll-1

They might find it difficult to search hones candidates but their task is not tough. They have to find only one per constituency. If we divide with number of voters it will be around 1.2 million people per seat. Is it that hard to find one honest person out of 1.2 million?

But the 'honest' person may not be eager to join AAP. He may not be efficient or interested in politics. Honest people can work in non political domain as well. Moreover, every honest person may not join AAP. They may join BJP, Congress or Communist as well. The GOA C.M., Tripura C.M., the Pudducheery C.M.- all three are very simple and honest but belong to BJP, Communist and regional party. As a matter of fact, dishonety is not declared policy of any political party. Nobody will say that he is dishonest. It is individuals who choose dishonesty and they may do irrespective of party affiliation. There is no way an AAM AADAMI Party member presumed 'honest' may not turn dishonest.

True. Nobody can foresee the things. Akin to this, nobody can predict if an honest man of today remains honest until tomorrow.

No, we certainly are not going to play a prediction or forecast game but talking about present situation of finding honest people for different political parties.

My intention was, after all parties are made of people and the people in the party whose honesty made an impact and created an impression that a particular party is known for its honest people today may turn out to be dishonest people due to avarice or some other reason. And about this uncertainty i was talking about.

Men can change but not parties, if they wish to remain honest they can always kick dishonest out. That is the only way remaining an honest party, otherwise what is so bad about present system?

All parties as such are honest. Men change. So even dishonest men can replace the honerst and vice versa. The system is certainly not corrupt. The system is as good or bad as that in western countries. It is the national character that makes difference. We should see corruption as a means of exploitation by the powerful. So only the victims viz. the poor can remove corruption. The buraucracy and powerful affluent private parties- the bribe giver and taker both benefit at the cost of poor who have no means to brive. So the poor have to organize to fight corruption. The so called AAM AADAMI as defined by Kejriwal is not poor but includes even the richest industrialists whol bribe or use corruption as a means to get favor that an ordinary poor person- the true AAM AADAMI cannot get.

AAP's success is a shining example for a common mans will to change the exploitation prevailing in the society. Though the composition of AAP includes a few rich people, it doesn't mean that they are against eradication of corruption in the society. It's their common commitment to root out corruption that bound them together.

Actually AAP experience is yet to be seen. Honerst is okay but without clear analysis of corruption- who gains and who loses and who can remove- there can be no success. According to AAP, the common man is one who is not in government service and uncommon or important are those in private. The corrupt bureaucrats gain and honest common men lose. This is perverse thinking of AAP. In fact, it is the so called aam aadami viz. corporate and wealthy persons who gain more from corruption. Just see that the recent announcement of free water led many consumers (who are aam aadami) to approach the meter readers (khas aadami) to get the reading within free limit by tampering. So how we can say that the aam aadami is honest.

again, no political party has agenda of corruption. So if AAP also says that tey are against corruption, it makes no difference. actually AAP can also get men only from same population. Nobody can say that those in AAM will be definitely honest and those in other parties dishonest.

Society is an admixture of good and bad, Class, wing or a segment do not define a persons character. I agree AAP's mode of classification in defining an individual character is not free from wrong notions. May be with time it may correct its opinions. One thing i must agree AAP sown the seeds in the minds of the people for the necessity of a change.

AAM AADAMI Party is in massive search for honest. They are on recruitment drive. But really honerst are very scarce.

http://news.oneindia.in/india/pics-main-bhi-aam-aadmi-aap-drive-to-hunt-honest-candidates-1371260.html#infinite-scroll-1

They might find it difficult to search hones candidates but their task is not tough. They have to find only one per constituency. If we divide with number of voters it will be around 1.2 million people per seat. Is it that hard to find one honest person out of 1.2 million?

But the 'honest' person may not be eager to join AAP. He may not be efficient or interested in politics. Honest people can work in non political domain as well. Moreover, every honest person may not join AAP. They may join BJP, Congress or Communist as well. The GOA C.M., Tripura C.M., the Pudducheery C.M.- all three are very simple and honest but belong to BJP, Communist and regional party. As a matter of fact, dishonety is not declared policy of any political party. Nobody will say that he is dishonest. It is individuals who choose dishonesty and they may do irrespective of party affiliation. There is no way an AAM AADAMI Party member presumed 'honest' may not turn dishonest.

True. Nobody can foresee the things. Akin to this, nobody can predict if an honest man of today remains honest until tomorrow.

No, we certainly are not going to play a prediction or forecast game but talking about present situation of finding honest people for different political parties.

My intention was, after all parties are made of people and the people in the party whose honesty made an impact and created an impression that a particular party is known for its honest people today may turn out to be dishonest people due to avarice or some other reason. And about this uncertainty i was talking about.

Men can change but not parties, if they wish to remain honest they can always kick dishonest out. That is the only way remaining an honest party, otherwise what is so bad about present system?

All parties as such are honest. Men change. So even dishonest men can replace the honerst and vice versa. The system is certainly not corrupt. The system is as good or bad as that in western countries. It is the national character that makes difference. We should see corruption as a means of exploitation by the powerful. So only the victims viz. the poor can remove corruption. The buraucracy and powerful affluent private parties- the bribe giver and taker both benefit at the cost of poor who have no means to brive. So the poor have to organize to fight corruption. The so called AAM AADAMI as defined by Kejriwal is not poor but includes even the richest industrialists whol bribe or use corruption as a means to get favor that an ordinary poor person- the true AAM AADAMI cannot get.

AAP's success is a shining example for a common mans will to change the exploitation prevailing in the society. Though the composition of AAP includes a few rich people, it doesn't mean that they are against eradication of corruption in the society. It's their common commitment to root out corruption that bound them together.

Actually AAP experience is yet to be seen. Honerst is okay but without clear analysis of corruption- who gains and who loses and who can remove- there can be no success. According to AAP, the common man is one who is not in government service and uncommon or important are those in private. The corrupt bureaucrats gain and honest common men lose. This is perverse thinking of AAP. In fact, it is the so called aam aadami viz. corporate and wealthy persons who gain more from corruption. Just see that the recent announcement of free water led many consumers (who are aam aadami) to approach the meter readers (khas aadami) to get the reading within free limit by tampering. So how we can say that the aam aadami is honest.

again, no political party has agenda of corruption. So if AAP also says that tey are against corruption, it makes no difference. actually AAP can also get men only from same population. Nobody can say that those in AAM will be definitely honest and those in other parties dishonest.

Society is an admixture of good and bad, Class, wing or a segment do not define a persons character. I agree AAP's mode of classification in defining an individual character is not free from wrong notions. May be with time it may correct its opinions. One thing i must agree AAP sown the seeds in the minds of the people for the necessity of a change.

We definitely need to improve. Every new organization brings some freshness. so people have expectation from AAP. We may also belive in sincerity of Kejriwal. But if the organization grows to national level, there will be many state level, district level leaders. You have no way to ensure that they will also be for long free from corrupt tendency. AAP is still taking shape. at agra also, there is rush for membership of new organization. The immediate affect of AAP emergence is that MODI wave is arrested.

I think this is the one of the best party I had seen we must wait and see until they will be honest for life time or not.

I think this is the one of the best party I had seen we must wait and see until they will be honest for life time or not.

That's the million dollar question standing before the nation today. Yes. Time alone can say about AAP's integrity.

In Delhi, newly born girl's body was found in garbage. This is really a very alarmin matter. But the Delhi health minister probably belives that the government has no job other than to remove corruption in govt. departments. Private sector is free. Accordingly, he said that the matter is concerned with private hospital and so better ask the concerned hospital. However Kejriwal intervened to assure that enquiry would be made.

http://www.jagran.com/news/national-aap-health-minister-shirks-question-as-hospital-dumps-newborn-girls-body-in-garbage-10990528.html

In Delhi, newly born girl's body was found in garbage. This is really a very alarmin matter. But the Delhi health minister probably belives that the government has no job other than to remove corruption in govt. departments. Private sector is free. Accordingly, he said that the matter is concerned with private hospital and so better ask the concerned hospital. However Kejriwal intervened to assure that enquiry would be made.

http://www.jagran.com/news/national-aap-health-minister-shirks-question-as-hospital-dumps-newborn-girls-body-in-garbage-10990528.html

So, the passing of Buck started. Though Kejriwal's intervention is good, but the question remains how long he will be intervening and solve the problems .

In Delhi, newly born girl's body was found in garbage. This is really a very alarmin matter. But the Delhi health minister probably belives that the government has no job other than to remove corruption in govt. departments. Private sector is free. Accordingly, he said that the matter is concerned with private hospital and so better ask the concerned hospital. However Kejriwal intervened to assure that enquiry would be made.

http://www.jagran.com/news/national-aap-health-minister-shirks-question-as-hospital-dumps-newborn-girls-body-in-garbage-10990528.html

So, the passing of Buck started. Though Kejriwal's intervention is good, but the question remains how long he will be intervening and solve the problems .

He may solve in Delhi but what when his organization grows and works in other states and country as a whole. Already Prashant Bhushan's stand on Kashmir is posing problem. Kejriwal asserted that Prashant Bhushan's opinion is not shared by him or his party.

In Delhi, newly born girl's body was found in garbage. This is really a very alarmin matter. But the Delhi health minister probably belives that the government has no job other than to remove corruption in govt. departments. Private sector is free. Accordingly, he said that the matter is concerned with private hospital and so better ask the concerned hospital. However Kejriwal intervened to assure that enquiry would be made.

http://www.jagran.com/news/national-aap-health-minister-shirks-question-as-hospital-dumps-newborn-girls-body-in-garbage-10990528.html

So, the passing of Buck started. Though Kejriwal's intervention is good, but the question remains how long he will be intervening and solve the problems .

He may solve in Delhi but what when his organization grows and works in other states and country as a whole. Already Prashant Bhushan's stand on Kashmir is posing problem. Kejriwal asserted that Prashant Bhushan's opinion is not shared by him or his party.

Any way you look at it, I'm seeing cracks in the fortress of AAP. Not a good sign.

AAM AADAMI Party is in massive search for honest. They are on recruitment drive. But really honerst are very scarce.

http://news.oneindia.in/india/pics-main-bhi-aam-aadmi-aap-drive-to-hunt-honest-candidates-1371260.html#infinite-scroll-1

I am sure there are many honest people in this country and AAP needs may be a few hundreds to stand for election ,,if we cannot find that many honest persons in our country then it is a gone case. The problem is what happens after one gets power in their hands.There are quite a few politicians too who have remained honest inspite of all the negative impact politics and power has on them...