The topic is locked.
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
Rulers must see the safety of individuals as they should see that voting should not be a burden to the social life of individuals.


When the question of providing safety to voters comes, authorities look the other way.. This is what happening in the present scenario.
Authorities looks the other way because, they are not supporters and authorities tend to support those who support party in power.

http://mohanmekap.com/

Thank you said by: Devyani Sarkar
Rulers must see the safety of individuals as they should see that voting should not be a burden to the social life of individuals.


When the question of providing safety to voters comes, authorities look the other way.. This is what happening in the present scenario.
Authorities looks the other way because, they are not supporters and authorities tend to support those who support party in power.


But you said in the above thread that authorities should see the safety of the individuals.
Presently a new button will be available "None of the above", in the voting machine. It is better not to vote any one. :angry:
Presently a new button will be available "None of the above", in the voting machine. It is better not to vote any one. :angry:


Even if you exercise 'None of the above', Naxalites (Maoist) will not spare. If you vote any way, the polling officer will ink your finger and the Maoists will beat or kill you. Moreover, 'none of above' is as good as not voting. Then why not stay at home and be secure.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

Thank you said by: mohan manohar
Presently a new button will be available "None of the above", in the voting machine. It is better not to vote any one. :angry:


Even if you exercise 'None of the above', Naxalites (Maoist) will not spare. If you vote any way, the polling officer will ink your finger and the Maoists will beat or kill you. Moreover, 'none of above' is as good as not voting. Then why not stay at home and be secure.
The none of the above is a pink button but it will still inked your finger and the naxalites will see it and can react it. In democracies these are the challenged and all these are in house challenges.

http://mohanmekap.com/

Thank you said by: Gulshan Kumar Ajmani
Presently a new button will be available "None of the above", in the voting machine. It is better not to vote any one. :angry:


Even if you exercise 'None of the above', Naxalites (Maoist) will not spare. If you vote any way, the polling officer will ink your finger and the Maoists will beat or kill you. Moreover, 'none of above' is as good as not voting. Then why not stay at home and be secure.
The none of the above is a pink button but it will still inked your finger and the naxalites will see it and can react it. In democracies these are the challenged and all these are in house challenges.


Challenges will be there. Will there be a life sans challenges? In these days of advanced technology i don't think this challenge cannot be addressed sooner than later.
Presently a new button will be available "None of the above", in the voting machine. It is better not to vote any one. :angry:


Even if you exercise 'None of the above', Naxalites (Maoist) will not spare. If you vote any way, the polling officer will ink your finger and the Maoists will beat or kill you. Moreover, 'none of above' is as good as not voting. Then why not stay at home and be secure.
The none of the above is a pink button but it will still inked your finger and the naxalites will see it and can react it. In democracies these are the challenged and all these are in house challenges.


Naxalites are angry because they don't want any government rule in their region. If a new button is introduced, I feel they won't attack people unknowingly. Many people don't want to vote any party. They can use their voting power to express their distress. Likewise, I feel that Naxalites will not kill people. They may at first ask and then beat or kill. :dry:

I would also say that someone from Naxalites should form a party. They should legally discuss with the people and the government, their demands and wants.
Presently a new button will be available "None of the above", in the voting machine. It is better not to vote any one. :angry:


Even if you exercise 'None of the above', Naxalites (Maoist) will not spare. If you vote any way, the polling officer will ink your finger and the Maoists will beat or kill you. Moreover, 'none of above' is as good as not voting. Then why not stay at home and be secure.
The none of the above is a pink button but it will still inked your finger and the naxalites will see it and can react it. In democracies these are the challenged and all these are in house challenges.


Naxalites are angry because they don't want any government rule in their region. If a new button is introduced, I feel they won't attack people unknowingly. Many people don't want to vote any party. They can use their voting power to express their distress. Likewise, I feel that Naxalites will not kill people. They may at first ask and then beat or kill. :dry:

I would also say that someone from Naxalites should form a party. They should legally discuss with the people and the government, their demands and wants.


The Naxalite have a party- Communist Party of India (Maoist). The would be discussing with people in the affected areas. As regards 'legally discussing' with government, they do not consider the govt. itself legal nor do they believe in constitution and law. They have declared war against govt. This is a very critical situation. People in the affected area cannot go to polling booth without risk of annoying Maoists.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

Rulers must see the safety of individuals as they should see that voting should not be a burden to the social life of individuals.


When the question of providing safety to voters comes, authorities look the other way.. This is what happening in the present scenario.
Authorities looks the other way because, they are not supporters and authorities tend to support those who support party in power.


But you said in the above thread that authorities should see the safety of the individuals.
They should have but they want to be sycophants in the front of their political bosses and they simply ignore what they ought to do or not to do.

http://mohanmekap.com/

Rulers must see the safety of individuals as they should see that voting should not be a burden to the social life of individuals.


When the question of providing safety to voters comes, authorities look the other way.. This is what happening in the present scenario.
Authorities looks the other way because, they are not supporters and authorities tend to support those who support party in power.


But you said in the above thread that authorities should see the safety of the individuals.
They should have but they want to be sycophants in the front of their political bosses and they simply ignore what they ought to do or not to do.


So, it all amounts to one thing. If indelible ink proves to be a curse on a certain section of the community and the govt. fails to protect the vulnerable, the individual himself would have to find out a way for his safety. What type of way the individual chooses is up to the individual.
Thank you said by: Gulshan Kumar Ajmani
You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.