OpenMeans Forum
Welcome, Guest
Recent activity
chinmoymukherjee replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
I quite fail to see how does refusal on the part of a morally scrupulous lawyer or a band of them could affect the legal proceedings against an accused person. It is not a must to go for the services of a lawyer and courts do grant permission to an accused to plead for oneself. Besides there is provision for legal aid for those who can not afford the services of a lawyer. The instances of courts appointing amicus curiae are too common and many to assist the court in such cased. From my own personal knowledge I know of so many cases where a few lawyers who initially accepted briefs of shady cases just to recuse themselves on moral grounds subsequently. Anyway we seem to be straying a bit from the relevant theme that Shampa's pointed question has raised. However obdurately we theorize, it can not hide the glaring fact in India that justice is bought with the greed of a few lawyers. It could be a subject matter for research that there are fewer convictions of high-profile case because of involvement of these so-called legal eagles who would go to any length to save their clients for material considerations. What distresses me is the fact that some leading lights in this business are more prone to throwing all moral aspects into the air than their less exalted conterparts in lower courts. Recently a bank manager of PSU bank committed a gory murder of his illicit lover and her little child.After committing this heinous act he chopped their bodies into pieces, bought a few jumbo suitcases to pack them, finally to drop them into the Hooghly river. He was caught by the fellow boat- passengers who handed them over to the police. The entire body of lawyers of Serampore court rose against this out moral revulsion and decided not to appear for him. Did they commit anything wrong? The said bank manager is aged above fifty and married with two college-going son and daughter and had an impeccable record as a gentleman in the locality!
10 years ago
chinmoymukherjee replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
I quite fail to see how does refusal on the part of a morally scrupulous lawyer or a band of them could affect the legal proceedings against an accused person. It is not a must to go for the services of a lawyer and courts do grant permission to an accused to plead for oneself. Besides there is provision for legal aid for those who can not afford the services of a lawyer. The instances of courts appointing amicus curiae are too common and many to assist the court in such cased. From my own personal knowledge I know of so many cases where a few lawyers who initially accepted briefs of shady cases just to recuse themselves on moral grounds subsequently. Anyway we seem to be straying a bit from the relevant theme that Shampa's pointed question has raised. However obdurately we theorize, it can not hide the glaring fact in India that justice is bought with the greed of a few lawyers. It could be a subject matter for research that there are fewer convictions of high-profile case because of involvement of these so-called legal eagles who would go to any length to save their clients for material considerations. What distresses me is the fact that some leading lights in this business are more prone to throwing all moral aspects into the air than their less exalted conterparts in lower courts. Recently a bank manager of PSU bank committed a gory murder of his illicit lover and her little child.After committing this heinous act he chopped their bodies into pieces, bought a few jumbo suitcases to pack them, finally to drop them into the Hooghly river. He was caught by the fellow boat- passengers who handed them over to the police. The entire body of lawyers of Serampore court rose against this out moral revulsion and decided not to appear for him. Did they commit anything wrong? The said bank manager is aged above fifty and married with two college-going son and daughter and had an impeccable record as a gentleman in the locality!
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
suni51 wrote:
rambabu wrote:
suni51 wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
OK. what happens if the defense council fails to prove the guilt of the accused, who was found to be committing a murder in the broad day light in the presence of onlookers, and he buys them with his money power ?
Your question is technically wrong! It's not the duty of defense council to prove the accused guilty. However if there is no witness then as they say the justice dends on proofs.
I had a doubt. And it has been cleared now/
I am surprised to note that you were in doubt whether defense council tries to prove his client guilty or tries to save him!
Such doubts are bound to occur in a person like me who has scanty knowledge about a particular subject and with confidence, that knowledgeable people can cover me. After all the spirit of these forums are to learn from the knowledgeable and ever willing members to lend their knowledge.
I
10 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
rambabu wrote:
suni51 wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
OK. what happens if the defense council fails to prove the guilt of the accused, who was found to be committing a murder in the broad day light in the presence of onlookers, and he buys them with his money power ?
Your question is technically wrong! It's not the duty of defense council to prove the accused guilty. However if there is no witness then as they say the justice dends on proofs.
I had a doubt. And it has been cleared now/
I am surprised to note that you were in doubt whether defense council tries to prove his client guilty or tries to save him!
10 years ago
rambabu said thank you to suni51 for his/her reply to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
rambabu wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
OK. what happens if the defense council fails to prove the guilt of the accused, who was found to be committing a murder in the broad day light in the presence of onlookers, and he buys them with his money power ?
Your question is technically wrong! It's not the duty of defense council to prove the accused guilty. However if there is no witness then as they say the justice dends on proofs.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
suni51 wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
OK. what happens if the defense council fails to prove the guilt of the accused, who was found to be committing a murder in the broad day light in the presence of onlookers, and he buys them with his money power ?
Your question is technically wrong! It's not the duty of defense council to prove the accused guilty. However if there is no witness then as they say the justice dends on proofs.
I had a doubt. And it has been cleared now/
10 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
rambabu wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
OK. what happens if the defense council fails to prove the guilt of the accused, who was found to be committing a murder in the broad day light in the presence of onlookers, and he buys them with his money power ?
Your question is technically wrong! Its not the futy of defense council to prove the accused guilty. However if there is no witness then as they say the justice dends on proofs.
10 years ago
took the quiz Quiz on Indian Wildlife Sanctuaries.
This is a quiz about Indian Wildlife Sanctuaries.The vast size of India and different climatic conditions has resulted into a wealth of more than 80 National Parks and 441 plus wildlife sanctuaries. Choose the correct answers from the options given below.
10 years ago
passed the quiz Quiz on Indian Wildlife Sanctuaries.
This is a quiz about Indian Wildlife Sanctuaries.The vast size of India and different climatic conditions has resulted into a wealth of more than 80 National Parks and 441 plus wildlife sanctuaries. Choose the correct answers from the options given below.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Goat milk price hits Rs 2,000 per litre in NCR.
Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:
bhuyali saroj wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Goat milk has many medicinal qualities. Even Donkey milk has medicinal Qualities. Because of the outbreak of Dengue in Delhi. Its demand has increased
sir does dengue is spreading rapidly in Delhi or its got any kind of treatment by the government in Delhi
The Delhi government is now taking many steps to control dengue. Hospitals are ordered to admit the patients and charge for dengue test has been fixed by the government.
Yes Dengue is under control says the Delhi Government
http://www.oneindia.com/india/dengue-situation-under-control-delhi-government-1868679.html
10 years ago
Manoj Kumar Lamba replied to the topic Goat milk price hits Rs 2,000 per litre in NCR.
bhuyali saroj wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Goat milk has many medicinal qualities. Even Donkey milk has medicinal Qualities. Because of the outbreak of Dengue in Delhi. Its demand has increased
sir does dengue is spreading rapidly in Delhi or its got any kind of treatment by the government in Delhi
The Delhi government is now taking many steps to control dengue. Hospitals are ordered to admit the patients and charge for dengue test has been fixed by the government.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
OK. what happens if the defense council fails to prove the guilt of the accused, who was found to be committing a murder in the broad day light in the presence of onlookers, and he buys them with his money power ?
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic Fatwah Issued Against A R Rahman.
bhuyali saroj wrote:
I am sorry sir but I haven't understand the meaning fatwah what does it mean sir does it mean dishonourable to ones community or religion
Who is sir ? anyway , the word "fatwa" actually means- It is an Arabic word, and it literally means "opinion".People often hear that a Muslim cleric or scholar has issued a "fatwa". In some cases, this word has been associated with very negative things, such as a death sentence on a person or a severe punishment.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Fatwah Issued Against A R Rahman.
Fatwah means a legal opinion or ruling issued by an Islamic scholar;
By the by if you don't have any idea of the subject, better don't attempt to respond. The meaning of Fatwa can be found in any online dictionary. Sorry for saying this.
Now you can answer the thread.
10 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani said thank you to usha manohar for his/her reply to the topic A Super Computer That Can Predict Your Death !.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Obviously it is phycical condition or health that determines remaining life of a person. But anyone can also chabge his life style and prolong his life. There is also a lufe expectancy on basis of staistics. The lige expectancy helps arriving at actuarial calculation by Insurance companies.
I dont get your point...
How long some one is expected to live. This is anticipated based on physical health and other circumstances like risky job etc. The insurance companies make calculation of average life expectancy- known as actuarial calculation- and fix premium rate accordingly. If the insured dies early, company loses. The company gains only when insured live long. It may not be possible to say how long one man will live but it is possible to tell the average.
Yes, of course.... all the calculations are based on scientific calculations , even Insurance companies, based on the doctors certificate given at the time of making the policy.., Thats exactly what this computer does , probably to a more accurate level and also is able to detect any defect or ill health that might become terminal in later stages.This helps us take care and probably avert fatality through early treatment..
10 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani said thank you to vijay for his/her reply to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
@ Shampa Sadhya, Sorry I spelt your name wrongly. In the eyes of the law all accused are innocent till proved guilty. Even a terrorist who is caught red handed is provided legal assistance to put forward his point as the law does not want to punish an innocent even if a guilty may walk free. Lawyers are not to be blamed. They are doing their duty and earning their livelihood.
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic A Super Computer That Can Predict Your Death !.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Obviously it is phycical condition or health that determines remaining life of a person. But anyone can also chabge his life style and prolong his life. There is also a lufe expectancy on basis of staistics. The lige expectancy helps arriving at actuarial calculation by Insurance companies.
I dont get your point...
How long some one is expected to live. This is anticipated based on physical health and other circumstances like risky job etc. The insurance companies make calculation of average life expectancy- known as actuarial calculation- and fix premium rate accordingly. If the insured dies early, company loses. The company gains only when insured live long. It may not be possible to say how long one man will live but it is possible to tell the average.
Yes, of course.... all the calculations are based on scientific calculations , even Insurance companies, based on the doctors certificate given at the time of making the policy.., Thats exactly what this computer does , probably to a more accurate level and also is able to detect any defect or ill health that might become terminal in later stages.This helps us take care and probably avert fatality through early treatment..
10 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic A Super Computer That Can Predict Your Death !.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Obviously it is phycical condition or health that determines remaining life of a person. But anyone can also chabge his life style and prolong his life. There is also a lufe expectancy on basis of staistics. The lige expectancy helps arriving at actuarial calculation by Insurance companies.
I dont get your point...
How long some one is expected to live. This is anticipated based on physical health and other circumstances like risky job etc. The insurance companies make calculation of average life expectancy- known as actuarial calculation- and fix premium rate accordingly. If the insured dies early, company loses. The company gains only when insured live long. It may not be possible to say how long one man will live but it is possible to tell the average.
sir, while agreeing with what you said, all the factors like health, average life expectancy are approximations, which may vary. But super computer can predict death almost accurately, Anyhow, the Researchers say that some more studies are to be carried out to prove Super computer's claims. Till then let's all wait.
10 years ago
bhuyali saroj replied to the topic Fatwah Issued Against A R Rahman.
I am sorry sir but I haven't understand the meaning fatwah what does it mean sir does it mean dishonourable to ones community or religion
10 years ago
chinmoymukherjee replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
I quite fail to see how does refusal on the part of a morally scrupulous lawyer or a band of them could affect the legal proceedings against an accused person. It is not a must to go for the services of a lawyer and courts do grant permission to an accused to plead for oneself. Besides there is provision for legal aid for those who can not afford the services of a lawyer. The instances of courts appointing amicus curiae are too common and many to assist the court in such cased. From my own personal knowledge I know of so many cases where a few lawyers who initially accepted briefs of shady cases just to recuse themselves on moral grounds subsequently. Anyway we seem to be straying a bit from the relevant theme that Shampa's pointed question has raised. However obdurately we theorize, it can not hide the glaring fact in India that justice is bought with the greed of a few lawyers. It could be a subject matter for research that there are fewer convictions of high-profile case because of involvement of these so-called legal eagles who would go to any length to save their clients for material considerations. What distresses me is the fact that some leading lights in this business are more prone to throwing all moral aspects into the air than their less exalted conterparts in lower courts. Recently a bank manager of PSU bank committed a gory murder of his illicit lover and her little child.After committing this heinous act he chopped their bodies into pieces, bought a few jumbo suitcases to pack them, finally to drop them into the Hooghly river. He was caught by the fellow boat- passengers who handed them over to the police. The entire body of lawyers of Serampore court rose against this out moral revulsion and decided not to appear for him. Did they commit anything wrong? The said bank manager is aged above fifty and married with two college-going son and daughter and had an impeccable record as a gentleman in the locality!
10 years ago
chinmoymukherjee replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
I quite fail to see how does refusal on the part of a morally scrupulous lawyer or a band of them could affect the legal proceedings against an accused person. It is not a must to go for the services of a lawyer and courts do grant permission to an accused to plead for oneself. Besides there is provision for legal aid for those who can not afford the services of a lawyer. The instances of courts appointing amicus curiae are too common and many to assist the court in such cased. From my own personal knowledge I know of so many cases where a few lawyers who initially accepted briefs of shady cases just to recuse themselves on moral grounds subsequently. Anyway we seem to be straying a bit from the relevant theme that Shampa's pointed question has raised. However obdurately we theorize, it can not hide the glaring fact in India that justice is bought with the greed of a few lawyers. It could be a subject matter for research that there are fewer convictions of high-profile case because of involvement of these so-called legal eagles who would go to any length to save their clients for material considerations. What distresses me is the fact that some leading lights in this business are more prone to throwing all moral aspects into the air than their less exalted conterparts in lower courts. Recently a bank manager of PSU bank committed a gory murder of his illicit lover and her little child.After committing this heinous act he chopped their bodies into pieces, bought a few jumbo suitcases to pack them, finally to drop them into the Hooghly river. He was caught by the fellow boat- passengers who handed them over to the police. The entire body of lawyers of Serampore court rose against this out moral revulsion and decided not to appear for him. Did they commit anything wrong? The said bank manager is aged above fifty and married with two college-going son and daughter and had an impeccable record as a gentleman in the locality!
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
suni51 wrote:
rambabu wrote:
suni51 wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
OK. what happens if the defense council fails to prove the guilt of the accused, who was found to be committing a murder in the broad day light in the presence of onlookers, and he buys them with his money power ?
Your question is technically wrong! It's not the duty of defense council to prove the accused guilty. However if there is no witness then as they say the justice dends on proofs.
I had a doubt. And it has been cleared now/
I am surprised to note that you were in doubt whether defense council tries to prove his client guilty or tries to save him!
Such doubts are bound to occur in a person like me who has scanty knowledge about a particular subject and with confidence, that knowledgeable people can cover me. After all the spirit of these forums are to learn from the knowledgeable and ever willing members to lend their knowledge.
I
10 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
rambabu wrote:
suni51 wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
OK. what happens if the defense council fails to prove the guilt of the accused, who was found to be committing a murder in the broad day light in the presence of onlookers, and he buys them with his money power ?
Your question is technically wrong! It's not the duty of defense council to prove the accused guilty. However if there is no witness then as they say the justice dends on proofs.
I had a doubt. And it has been cleared now/
I am surprised to note that you were in doubt whether defense council tries to prove his client guilty or tries to save him!
10 years ago
rambabu said thank you to suni51 for his/her reply to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
rambabu wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
OK. what happens if the defense council fails to prove the guilt of the accused, who was found to be committing a murder in the broad day light in the presence of onlookers, and he buys them with his money power ?
Your question is technically wrong! It's not the duty of defense council to prove the accused guilty. However if there is no witness then as they say the justice dends on proofs.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
suni51 wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
OK. what happens if the defense council fails to prove the guilt of the accused, who was found to be committing a murder in the broad day light in the presence of onlookers, and he buys them with his money power ?
Your question is technically wrong! It's not the duty of defense council to prove the accused guilty. However if there is no witness then as they say the justice dends on proofs.
I had a doubt. And it has been cleared now/
10 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
rambabu wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
OK. what happens if the defense council fails to prove the guilt of the accused, who was found to be committing a murder in the broad day light in the presence of onlookers, and he buys them with his money power ?
Your question is technically wrong! Its not the futy of defense council to prove the accused guilty. However if there is no witness then as they say the justice dends on proofs.
10 years ago
took the quiz Quiz on Indian Wildlife Sanctuaries.
This is a quiz about Indian Wildlife Sanctuaries.The vast size of India and different climatic conditions has resulted into a wealth of more than 80 National Parks and 441 plus wildlife sanctuaries. Choose the correct answers from the options given below.
10 years ago
passed the quiz Quiz on Indian Wildlife Sanctuaries.
This is a quiz about Indian Wildlife Sanctuaries.The vast size of India and different climatic conditions has resulted into a wealth of more than 80 National Parks and 441 plus wildlife sanctuaries. Choose the correct answers from the options given below.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Goat milk price hits Rs 2,000 per litre in NCR.
Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:
bhuyali saroj wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Goat milk has many medicinal qualities. Even Donkey milk has medicinal Qualities. Because of the outbreak of Dengue in Delhi. Its demand has increased
sir does dengue is spreading rapidly in Delhi or its got any kind of treatment by the government in Delhi
The Delhi government is now taking many steps to control dengue. Hospitals are ordered to admit the patients and charge for dengue test has been fixed by the government.
Yes Dengue is under control says the Delhi Government
http://www.oneindia.com/india/dengue-situation-under-control-delhi-government-1868679.html
10 years ago
Manoj Kumar Lamba replied to the topic Goat milk price hits Rs 2,000 per litre in NCR.
bhuyali saroj wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Goat milk has many medicinal qualities. Even Donkey milk has medicinal Qualities. Because of the outbreak of Dengue in Delhi. Its demand has increased
sir does dengue is spreading rapidly in Delhi or its got any kind of treatment by the government in Delhi
The Delhi government is now taking many steps to control dengue. Hospitals are ordered to admit the patients and charge for dengue test has been fixed by the government.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
OK. what happens if the defense council fails to prove the guilt of the accused, who was found to be committing a murder in the broad day light in the presence of onlookers, and he buys them with his money power ?
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic Fatwah Issued Against A R Rahman.
bhuyali saroj wrote:
I am sorry sir but I haven't understand the meaning fatwah what does it mean sir does it mean dishonourable to ones community or religion
Who is sir ? anyway , the word "fatwa" actually means- It is an Arabic word, and it literally means "opinion".People often hear that a Muslim cleric or scholar has issued a "fatwa". In some cases, this word has been associated with very negative things, such as a death sentence on a person or a severe punishment.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Fatwah Issued Against A R Rahman.
Fatwah means a legal opinion or ruling issued by an Islamic scholar;
By the by if you don't have any idea of the subject, better don't attempt to respond. The meaning of Fatwa can be found in any online dictionary. Sorry for saying this.
Now you can answer the thread.
10 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani said thank you to usha manohar for his/her reply to the topic A Super Computer That Can Predict Your Death !.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Obviously it is phycical condition or health that determines remaining life of a person. But anyone can also chabge his life style and prolong his life. There is also a lufe expectancy on basis of staistics. The lige expectancy helps arriving at actuarial calculation by Insurance companies.
I dont get your point...
How long some one is expected to live. This is anticipated based on physical health and other circumstances like risky job etc. The insurance companies make calculation of average life expectancy- known as actuarial calculation- and fix premium rate accordingly. If the insured dies early, company loses. The company gains only when insured live long. It may not be possible to say how long one man will live but it is possible to tell the average.
Yes, of course.... all the calculations are based on scientific calculations , even Insurance companies, based on the doctors certificate given at the time of making the policy.., Thats exactly what this computer does , probably to a more accurate level and also is able to detect any defect or ill health that might become terminal in later stages.This helps us take care and probably avert fatality through early treatment..
10 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani said thank you to vijay for his/her reply to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
@ Shampa Sadhya, Sorry I spelt your name wrongly. In the eyes of the law all accused are innocent till proved guilty. Even a terrorist who is caught red handed is provided legal assistance to put forward his point as the law does not want to punish an innocent even if a guilty may walk free. Lawyers are not to be blamed. They are doing their duty and earning their livelihood.
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic A Super Computer That Can Predict Your Death !.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Obviously it is phycical condition or health that determines remaining life of a person. But anyone can also chabge his life style and prolong his life. There is also a lufe expectancy on basis of staistics. The lige expectancy helps arriving at actuarial calculation by Insurance companies.
I dont get your point...
How long some one is expected to live. This is anticipated based on physical health and other circumstances like risky job etc. The insurance companies make calculation of average life expectancy- known as actuarial calculation- and fix premium rate accordingly. If the insured dies early, company loses. The company gains only when insured live long. It may not be possible to say how long one man will live but it is possible to tell the average.
Yes, of course.... all the calculations are based on scientific calculations , even Insurance companies, based on the doctors certificate given at the time of making the policy.., Thats exactly what this computer does , probably to a more accurate level and also is able to detect any defect or ill health that might become terminal in later stages.This helps us take care and probably avert fatality through early treatment..
10 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani replied to the topic Shouldn't legal professionals have some moral responsibility towards society?.
rambabu wrote:
There are such cases, where lawyers did not agree to defend the criminals. But how many such lawyers are there?
There were some cases like 'Nithari murders' in U.P. where lawyers refused to argue for the accused. But this is sentimental and not professional attitude. a lawyer must accept every assignment. He can defend his client best way not necessarily by misrepresenting. Actually, it is the prosecution that will prove that the accused is guilty. The accused's lawyer is defence counsel whose job is just to cross examine the witness of the prosecution and find holes in the prosecution case. He will work for proving the client not guilty or getting him benefit of doubt or lighter punishment. In fact, there can be no court proceedings unless the accused gets opportunity to defend himself. So it is necessary in interest of administration of justice that accused gets defence counsel- whatever be his nature of crime.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic A Super Computer That Can Predict Your Death !.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Obviously it is phycical condition or health that determines remaining life of a person. But anyone can also chabge his life style and prolong his life. There is also a lufe expectancy on basis of staistics. The lige expectancy helps arriving at actuarial calculation by Insurance companies.
I dont get your point...
How long some one is expected to live. This is anticipated based on physical health and other circumstances like risky job etc. The insurance companies make calculation of average life expectancy- known as actuarial calculation- and fix premium rate accordingly. If the insured dies early, company loses. The company gains only when insured live long. It may not be possible to say how long one man will live but it is possible to tell the average.
sir, while agreeing with what you said, all the factors like health, average life expectancy are approximations, which may vary. But super computer can predict death almost accurately, Anyhow, the Researchers say that some more studies are to be carried out to prove Super computer's claims. Till then let's all wait.
10 years ago
bhuyali saroj replied to the topic Fatwah Issued Against A R Rahman.
I am sorry sir but I haven't understand the meaning fatwah what does it mean sir does it mean dishonourable to ones community or religion
10 years ago