OpenMeans Forum
Welcome, Guest
Recent activity
usha manohar replied to the topic Indo Nepal relation.
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
We have to remember that there is an open border between India and Nepal and often this is the route terrorists have taken to infiltrate into India. Given this fact India would naturally be concerned with Nepal's growing friendship with China. The only option left for India would be make Visa mandatory for Nepalis and also close the border or else we will have Chinese will have an easy access to come into Indian territory ! India is right in showing its concerns now that Nepal will be a secular state and if it is going to be on Indian model then we need to seriously worry about our safety ..
It is right that development of friend ship of Nepal with China is not in the interest of India. It may possible that in future Nepal government allowed China to have camp of army in Nepal, on head of India. Making Visa is not practically possible. Millions Nepalis are living in India.
There are millions of Indians working all over the world without any problem, it will be the same for Nepalis living here and things would be better organised too for our country and its safety which is what is first priority !
10 years ago
anil replied to the topic Saffronizing education .
chinmoymukherjee wrote:Saffronizing education is nether a goal worth striving for nor is it feasible in today's realities.Verification is just one click away!! Similarly laying importance on Sanskrit is not saffronization. Its literature continues to captivate the imagination of the cerebral world by being an ocean of knowledge encompassing all brunches of it,accommodating all strands and shades of views and philosophies.However it has lost its spoken status as a language for ever.
Sanskrit is a language like other languages. First, how many students are interested in reading languages. Maths, English, is much more important for students.
10 years ago
anil replied to the topic Indo Nepal relation.
vijay wrote:
Religion is not a binding factor. Otherwise Christian and Muslim countries would not be fighting each other. India and Indians should not see Nepal as a Hindu nation but as a independent sovereign nation Also the fact that the PM ans President are communists also explains leaning towards China. It is not going to be easy for India to woo Nepal like before but that is the challenge Indian goct has to face and overcome.
Yes I am also saying it, Nepal is not problem for India but going step of China in to Nepal is not good for the India, we have not forgotten Tibbet.
10 years ago
anil replied to the topic Indo Nepal relation.
usha manohar wrote:
We have to remember that there is an open border between India and Nepal and often this is the route terrorists have taken to infiltrate into India. Given this fact India would naturally be concerned with Nepal's growing friendship with China. The only option left for India would be make Visa mandatory for Nepalis and also close the border or else we will have Chinese will have an easy access to come into Indian territory ! India is right in showing its concerns now that Nepal will be a secular state and if it is going to be on Indian model then we need to seriously worry about our safety ..
It is right that development of friend ship of Nepal with China is not in the interest of India. It may possible that in future Nepal government allowed China to have camp of army in Nepal, on head of India. Making Visa is not practically possible. Millions Nepalis are living in India.
10 years ago
anil replied to the topic Indo Nepal relation.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Nepal is our neighbor. Vhina is also Nepal's neighbor. So Nepal needs maintain at leastworking relation with both- India as well as China. No doubt, There are Hindus in Nepal as well as India. Nepal was a Hindu nation. But now Nepal is secilar. India is also yet secular. Thus India and Nepal are both secular. Another thing. President and Prime minister of Nepal are communist. Vhina is also ruled by Communist Party. Thus Nepal has something common with India and China both.
Realation depends on mutual interest and respect for sovereignty of each other. Nepal is a self respecting sovereign country. India has to respect sovereignty of Nepal and not interferein internal matters. If India respects sovereignty of Nepal and doesnot interfere with her internal issues, therelations should be smooth.
we need to rememberthat there are no peranent friends. Thereare permanent interests.
It is not policy of India to interference in the other country. Nepal has only one thing common it is communist government. But it is not permanent. It may possible that in next election other party come in to power. The mazor is that India and Nepal have common interest. Nepali is integral part of Indian society. (not India) Many Indian are doing business in Nepal. Any hardship with Indian in Nepal may cause of problem for both country.
10 years ago
took the quiz Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.
This is a Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.lets see how much you know about this.Choose the correct answers from the options given below.
10 years ago
passed the quiz Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.
This is a Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.lets see how much you know about this.Choose the correct answers from the options given below.
10 years ago
chinmoymukherjee replied to the topic Saffronizing education .
Saffronizing education is nether a goal
worth striving for nor is it feasible in
today's realities.Verification is just one
click away!! Similarly laying importance
on Sanskrit is not saffronization. Its
literature continues to captivate the imagination
of the cerebral world by being an ocean
of knowledge encompassing all brunches of
it,accommodating all strands and shades of
views and philosophies.However it has lost
its spoken status as a language for ever.
10 years ago
chinmoymukherjee replied to the topic Saffronizing education .
Saffronizing education is nether a goal
worth striving for nor is it feasible in
today's realities.Verification is just one
click away!! Similarly laying importance
on Sanskrit is not saffronization. Its
literature continues to captivate the imagination
of the cerebral world by being an ocean
of knowledge encompassing all brunches of
it,accommodating all strands and shades of
views and philosophies.However it has lost
its spoken status as a language for ever.
10 years ago
Manoj Kumar Lamba replied to the topic India has become over tolerant- Now Shahrukh Khan says 'My name is Khan' otherwise Yousuf Khan had to change his name to Dilip Kumar.
This all agitation about intolerance is going on to attack Modiji, but in this process these people are doing loss to the image of the country in the world. Today Pakistani cricketer Javed Miyadad attacked on Indian government and said that soon India will divide in many parts. Why these people are giving chance to others to speak against us.?
This all should be stopped immediately.
http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/cricket-news/javed-miandad-predicts-division-of-country/articleshow/49697687.cms
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic India has become over tolerant- Now Shahrukh Khan says 'My name is Khan' otherwise Yousuf Khan had to change his name to Dilip Kumar.
I am sure. it's not a pause but a grinding halt is going to take place for these agitations on intolerance Both sides should realize that the Nation's precious time has been wasted on an issue of no importance.
10 years ago
10 years ago
vijay replied to the topic India has become over tolerant- Now Shahrukh Khan says 'My name is Khan' otherwise Yousuf Khan had to change his name to Dilip Kumar.
In a perfect democratic manner both sides have got an opportunity to present their case to the highest authority in the country. Now there should be a pause. Protests always register their impact. Both sides have a viewpoint and are entitled to it.
10 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Saffronizing education .
Urdu is supposed to have originated in the Mughal armies as a mixture of Hindi and Persian. Persiam and Arabian are very different from each other. It is natural for the new government whose ideology is different from that of the previous one to further its beliefs as was done by earlier governments. We should not ascribe negative motives to justify the changes.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic India has become over tolerant- Now Shahrukh Khan says 'My name is Khan' otherwise Yousuf Khan had to change his name to Dilip Kumar.
Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:
suni51 wrote:
These people which have lost all their relevance do not have slightest of fear of being targeted like 'Charlie Hebdo' so they will abuse the tolerance of Indians, but how long will it go like this! They will soon face the right answer from right thinking Indians.
True, now people have started opposing what is all happening in India in the name of intolerance.
http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/india/anupam-kher-leads-march-for-india-in-support-of-government/articleshow/49697825.cms
Now more and more Artists are joining the March led by Anupam Kher, veteran actor. He said in no uncertain words that, India is very tolerant country. Intolerance is the word created by the opposition parties.
Very reputed directors and artists like director Priyadarshan, senior actor Paresh Rawal to name a few are joining the March.The march is going to start from National Museum , Janpath up to Rashtrapati Bhawan
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic Learning a new language. .
@ Chinmoy most people including me have learnt languages because of need .In my own case since Kannada is the state language you have to learn it and since Thulu and Konkani is spoken in my home town I get to learn it without much effort ! If a person really wants to learn a new language then one has to do it from the basics .
10 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Indo Nepal relation.
Religion is not a binding factor. Otherwise Christian and Muslim countries would not be fighting each other. India and Indians should not see Nepal as a Hindu nation but as a independent sovereign nation Also the fact that the PM ans President are communists also explains leaning towards China. It is not going to be easy for India to woo Nepal like before but that is the challenge Indian goct has to face and overcome.
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic Indo Nepal relation.
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
We have to remember that there is an open border between India and Nepal and often this is the route terrorists have taken to infiltrate into India. Given this fact India would naturally be concerned with Nepal's growing friendship with China. The only option left for India would be make Visa mandatory for Nepalis and also close the border or else we will have Chinese will have an easy access to come into Indian territory ! India is right in showing its concerns now that Nepal will be a secular state and if it is going to be on Indian model then we need to seriously worry about our safety ..
It is right that development of friend ship of Nepal with China is not in the interest of India. It may possible that in future Nepal government allowed China to have camp of army in Nepal, on head of India. Making Visa is not practically possible. Millions Nepalis are living in India.
There are millions of Indians working all over the world without any problem, it will be the same for Nepalis living here and things would be better organised too for our country and its safety which is what is first priority !
10 years ago
anil replied to the topic Saffronizing education .
chinmoymukherjee wrote:Saffronizing education is nether a goal worth striving for nor is it feasible in today's realities.Verification is just one click away!! Similarly laying importance on Sanskrit is not saffronization. Its literature continues to captivate the imagination of the cerebral world by being an ocean of knowledge encompassing all brunches of it,accommodating all strands and shades of views and philosophies.However it has lost its spoken status as a language for ever.
Sanskrit is a language like other languages. First, how many students are interested in reading languages. Maths, English, is much more important for students.
10 years ago
anil replied to the topic Indo Nepal relation.
vijay wrote:
Religion is not a binding factor. Otherwise Christian and Muslim countries would not be fighting each other. India and Indians should not see Nepal as a Hindu nation but as a independent sovereign nation Also the fact that the PM ans President are communists also explains leaning towards China. It is not going to be easy for India to woo Nepal like before but that is the challenge Indian goct has to face and overcome.
Yes I am also saying it, Nepal is not problem for India but going step of China in to Nepal is not good for the India, we have not forgotten Tibbet.
10 years ago
anil replied to the topic Indo Nepal relation.
usha manohar wrote:
We have to remember that there is an open border between India and Nepal and often this is the route terrorists have taken to infiltrate into India. Given this fact India would naturally be concerned with Nepal's growing friendship with China. The only option left for India would be make Visa mandatory for Nepalis and also close the border or else we will have Chinese will have an easy access to come into Indian territory ! India is right in showing its concerns now that Nepal will be a secular state and if it is going to be on Indian model then we need to seriously worry about our safety ..
It is right that development of friend ship of Nepal with China is not in the interest of India. It may possible that in future Nepal government allowed China to have camp of army in Nepal, on head of India. Making Visa is not practically possible. Millions Nepalis are living in India.
10 years ago
anil replied to the topic Indo Nepal relation.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Nepal is our neighbor. Vhina is also Nepal's neighbor. So Nepal needs maintain at leastworking relation with both- India as well as China. No doubt, There are Hindus in Nepal as well as India. Nepal was a Hindu nation. But now Nepal is secilar. India is also yet secular. Thus India and Nepal are both secular. Another thing. President and Prime minister of Nepal are communist. Vhina is also ruled by Communist Party. Thus Nepal has something common with India and China both.
Realation depends on mutual interest and respect for sovereignty of each other. Nepal is a self respecting sovereign country. India has to respect sovereignty of Nepal and not interferein internal matters. If India respects sovereignty of Nepal and doesnot interfere with her internal issues, therelations should be smooth.
we need to rememberthat there are no peranent friends. Thereare permanent interests.
It is not policy of India to interference in the other country. Nepal has only one thing common it is communist government. But it is not permanent. It may possible that in next election other party come in to power. The mazor is that India and Nepal have common interest. Nepali is integral part of Indian society. (not India) Many Indian are doing business in Nepal. Any hardship with Indian in Nepal may cause of problem for both country.
10 years ago
took the quiz Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.
This is a Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.lets see how much you know about this.Choose the correct answers from the options given below.
10 years ago
passed the quiz Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.
This is a Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.lets see how much you know about this.Choose the correct answers from the options given below.
10 years ago
chinmoymukherjee replied to the topic Saffronizing education .
Saffronizing education is nether a goal
worth striving for nor is it feasible in
today's realities.Verification is just one
click away!! Similarly laying importance
on Sanskrit is not saffronization. Its
literature continues to captivate the imagination
of the cerebral world by being an ocean
of knowledge encompassing all brunches of
it,accommodating all strands and shades of
views and philosophies.However it has lost
its spoken status as a language for ever.
10 years ago
chinmoymukherjee replied to the topic Saffronizing education .
Saffronizing education is nether a goal
worth striving for nor is it feasible in
today's realities.Verification is just one
click away!! Similarly laying importance
on Sanskrit is not saffronization. Its
literature continues to captivate the imagination
of the cerebral world by being an ocean
of knowledge encompassing all brunches of
it,accommodating all strands and shades of
views and philosophies.However it has lost
its spoken status as a language for ever.
10 years ago
Manoj Kumar Lamba replied to the topic India has become over tolerant- Now Shahrukh Khan says 'My name is Khan' otherwise Yousuf Khan had to change his name to Dilip Kumar.
This all agitation about intolerance is going on to attack Modiji, but in this process these people are doing loss to the image of the country in the world. Today Pakistani cricketer Javed Miyadad attacked on Indian government and said that soon India will divide in many parts. Why these people are giving chance to others to speak against us.?
This all should be stopped immediately.
http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/cricket-news/javed-miandad-predicts-division-of-country/articleshow/49697687.cms
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic India has become over tolerant- Now Shahrukh Khan says 'My name is Khan' otherwise Yousuf Khan had to change his name to Dilip Kumar.
I am sure. it's not a pause but a grinding halt is going to take place for these agitations on intolerance Both sides should realize that the Nation's precious time has been wasted on an issue of no importance.
10 years ago
10 years ago
vijay replied to the topic India has become over tolerant- Now Shahrukh Khan says 'My name is Khan' otherwise Yousuf Khan had to change his name to Dilip Kumar.
In a perfect democratic manner both sides have got an opportunity to present their case to the highest authority in the country. Now there should be a pause. Protests always register their impact. Both sides have a viewpoint and are entitled to it.
10 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Saffronizing education .
Urdu is supposed to have originated in the Mughal armies as a mixture of Hindi and Persian. Persiam and Arabian are very different from each other. It is natural for the new government whose ideology is different from that of the previous one to further its beliefs as was done by earlier governments. We should not ascribe negative motives to justify the changes.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic India has become over tolerant- Now Shahrukh Khan says 'My name is Khan' otherwise Yousuf Khan had to change his name to Dilip Kumar.
Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:
suni51 wrote:
These people which have lost all their relevance do not have slightest of fear of being targeted like 'Charlie Hebdo' so they will abuse the tolerance of Indians, but how long will it go like this! They will soon face the right answer from right thinking Indians.
True, now people have started opposing what is all happening in India in the name of intolerance.
http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/india/anupam-kher-leads-march-for-india-in-support-of-government/articleshow/49697825.cms
Now more and more Artists are joining the March led by Anupam Kher, veteran actor. He said in no uncertain words that, India is very tolerant country. Intolerance is the word created by the opposition parties.
Very reputed directors and artists like director Priyadarshan, senior actor Paresh Rawal to name a few are joining the March.The march is going to start from National Museum , Janpath up to Rashtrapati Bhawan
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic Learning a new language. .
@ Chinmoy most people including me have learnt languages because of need .In my own case since Kannada is the state language you have to learn it and since Thulu and Konkani is spoken in my home town I get to learn it without much effort ! If a person really wants to learn a new language then one has to do it from the basics .
10 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Indo Nepal relation.
Religion is not a binding factor. Otherwise Christian and Muslim countries would not be fighting each other. India and Indians should not see Nepal as a Hindu nation but as a independent sovereign nation Also the fact that the PM ans President are communists also explains leaning towards China. It is not going to be easy for India to woo Nepal like before but that is the challenge Indian goct has to face and overcome.
10 years ago