OpenMeans Forum
Welcome, Guest
Recent activity
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani created new topic How you view mythology!.
Politics is broadly divided as Left and Right. How you decide whether you are Left, Right or Centrist.
Here is a way. Here is a chart depending on your views on mythology. As I don't have any faith in mythology, which means only 'myth (untrue) , I can't decide whether I am Left or Right.
9 years ago
rambabu wrote:
MG Singh wrote:I will take whatever Prashant Bhusan says with a pinch of salt. This is the same man who talked of atrocities of Indian army in Kashmir and advocated freedom. He was thrashed for this in his chamber. Even at that time Kejriwal distanced himself from Bhushan. Bhushan is the man who insisted on a midnight session of Supreme court for Afzal Guru hanging annulment.take what he says with a pinch of salt.
Persons like Prashant Bhusan are, without spine.
I know the full history of Prashant Bhushan . A person who demanded midnight session of the Supreme court for Afzal Guru hanging annulment is more dangerous than Afzal Guru. Though he was thrashed, Prashant did not learn the lesson. A shameless traitor. He is the one who actually needs whipping.
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar replied to the topic Dowry and alimony.
I guess the Times of India reporters do not know that alimony is given only to spouses and not parents! Alimony, support, maintenance, call it whatever you like, it amounts to the same thing and that is 'to provide financial support to the ones who are left holding the wrong end of the stick.' So what problem is there if 'alimony' is paid to parents instead of support?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Old-parents-can-get-alimony-too/articleshow/611401.cms
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Dowry and alimony.
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
Asking for dowry is a crime but it is still prevalent in our society. The girl's side must not give dowry in any circumstance because the men who accept dowry in marriage are not worthy to get married. Now, comes the question of alimony, regarding it I will second @usha manohar's opinion but with a minor twist. I would prefer ladies not to accept alimony from their husband with whom their relationship has gone sour and by doing so their self respect will rise. Yes, there are some circumstances when the divorced ladies are left with no choice and are willingly/unwillingly have to accept alimony. On the other hand I am against those ladies who file false cases to harass the husband and the in-laws. They in no way deserve alimony but if their is a child in between then certainly the man as a father has a responsibility towards his child so for his/her sake one must take care of the child's need such as education and all other requirements.
Like I said before it is not at all an easy matter to get alimony because family courts deliberate and after a lot of considerations think of granting alimony, so there is no question of any false case being encouraged by the court , which is as it is , is prejudiced against women !
It seems you got me a little wrong. I did not mean that court will encourage false case for alimony. I was talking about the fake domestic violence cases filed by the wives and when it gets proved that the wife's accusation was false then in that case divorce should be granted to the husband and alimony should not be given to her. That should be her punishment for ruining an entire family only because of her selfish desire.
I am agree with you if some one file false case against husband than after divorce wife have not any right of alimony but she must be punished for defamation of husband. Only hard punishment can stop misuse of any law.
Exactly, this is what I want to say. Be it a man or a woman, no one has the right to defame another family and ruin their lives. Kill one and get away with it. Yes, I know that in India women are mainly the sufferers of bad marriage and I have all my feelings with them but I am not with those women who misuse the law and spoil some innocent lives and vice versa. I have seen many cases like this and I can't accept and forgive people of this kind so I want them to be punished be it a man or a woman.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Let's discuss facts.
vijay wrote:
So what is wrong in it. Why should your way be the only way.
Difference of opinion is acceptable but for that one should not indulge into killing. That needs to be criticised. One may support Godse's opinion but his expression of protest was not a worthy one.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
anil wrote:
suni51 wrote:
All such people behaving in such a hateful manner have no right to stay in open and if someone wants me to brand a BJP party follower that I am certainly not but I speak for my country. When a BJP member talks bad I react in the same way. It's high time we forget all about party affiliations and work for our nation or wait for the dooms day. After all what kind of freedom of expression is that which speaks ill against our own Mother-Nation? I hail the judgement of the Delhi High Court.
You are much annoyed on Delhi High court judgement. But it is interim judgement not final one. Still courts of India is raise of hope. for one moment if we accept that president of JNU did not rays anti India slogan than who did it. He is president of JNU and also host of that meeting. for any wrong thing he is prime facia responsible. Now it is his duty to trace persons who raise slogan. One more question he called meeting to gloryfy Afzal, why he did not call meeting to pay homage to martyr, brave security personal of India who sacrifice their life to save to honor and grace of temple of India's democracy, " The Parliament.
JNU is one such university where regularly various kind of discussions and meetings take place. Are we aware of each and every such meetings? Can you name any Indian student from JNU who turned out to be a criminal or a terrorist? Rather we have greats from this university. It is true, the judge gave bail with many conditions and it's natural because it is yet to be proved who was behind all the activities. Let us wait for the other findings. If he was wrong then he should be punished otherwise not and I think we on this forum should remain open.
9 years ago
MG Singh liked a reply to the topic Introduction of Flogging as a punishment for some offences where a simple jail term has no meaning.
9 years ago
MG Singh replied to the topic Indian Air Force is not at full strength and this is a grave handicap when facing China/.
anil wrote:
vijay wrote:
I wonder how much time is being unproductively spent by many members in blaming Nehru and his descendents. Even if one were to agree with the solidly biased opinions made without basis and research and on hearsay what is being gained. Nehru led India when it was at its lowest point in economy and he or anyone in his place could not have made India a military power . Today we are the largest armaments buyers in the world because our economy is able to bear the expense and yet the infiltrators walk in. That should be the issue. How to make India stronger should be debated. Nehru bashing is not going to lead anywhere except making some babus and singhs happy again and again.
Vijay, first thing we are not blaming Nehru Ji, he is respected leader of India who sacrifice enough for the freedom. We are only debating about his policies. India is not capable in manufacturing armaments so it have only one alternates to buy from others. Now India is enough strong country and also needs of whole world. Nehru ji was founder of Non alliance group but after defeat from China he wrote letter to USA President for supply of armaments, and it was President of USA who stop Pakistan to attack on India when India was struggling with China. Hopeless non alliance group!
Nehru was a idealist and thus never understood power politics and famous Mao quote ' power comes out of a barrel of a gun'. He had a chance to be greatest leader in Asia but in ultimate analysis flunked. Why we cannot forget Nehru because he saddled India for ever with kashmir problem and lost territory to China. He reduced India to a second rate power. Hero worship of Nehru must stop as he left problems for Indians that can never be solved for next 100 years.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Dirty politics and vendetta by the grand old party !.
vijay wrote:
Politicians indulge in corruption because they are greedy, officers join or submit because they have to save their families, we are helpless and so have to tolerate. Great nations are not made this way.
It's very true that great nations are not made like this but we are helpless. The political circle has to be honest and selfless then only it will send a strong positive message to the citizens which includes the government officials who will have faith in the system and perform their duty accordingly.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic India finally coming to terms with its population...
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Kalyani Nandurkar wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
I agree that population control should be done consistently regardless of religion, only then can it be effective... Christian families too tended to be very large although , now they are aware of the practical difficulties of having too many children and have consciously been bringing down the size of their families which is a good size...The educated muslims too have realised the advantage small family gives them but it is a different matter in villages and in uneducated families
True Usha, more and more educated families now realize the importance of having less children and are doing so of their own will, but still even in cities there are many families who are educated but still refuse to adopt control measures. I closely now a family where he daughter's first born son was diagnosed with a congenital heart valve, instead of focusing on his treatment, her in-laws forced her to have two more sons, in addition to first 2 sons and a daughter, and now with 5 children, he has been sent back to her parents. Her father is a retired engineer from MES and all these people are well educated. But her in-laws won't accept her back saying she has a curse on her head just because of the first born son's condition. Not to mention, the family is Muslim!
Yes it is still not 100% ...My sister who is a gynecologist goes to villages with their mobile unit and there have been times when they have been threatened and abused by muslim men because their wives were advised on family planning by the doctors..They had to lodge a police complaint once because these men would not let them work in the village which comprises of all religious groups ..
India is big country and 100% is not possible. Hindus are serious about size of family even in rural area. They understand that more children, more pieces of their lands. Gradully Muslim will also understand this fact that small family in favor of them and their children.
I agree with you. I also agree with Usha and Kalyani on the importance of smaller families. What I think is a change in attitude of the people started. As you said, because of the vastness of the country, the small change will not look conspicuously. The much needed Small Family norm will take time, though not immediately, . I have seen , this change of attitude is visible even in orthodox Muslim families.
Yes it will take time, government is also doing enough in this field. Cash awards for sterilization is effective one.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic some unusual law .
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Jincy Aby wrote:
Flying kite is one of the interesting activities among children. Even small children can fly kite very easily. I don't understand why there is license for flying kite. Will they punish the little cute children whether they fly kite for enjoyment? Really a funny law.
If the cute and little children can fly a kite, of course they too are punishable. Because it's a law. It may look strange to many, even if the law looks and sounds strange, it has to be obeyed. Then "UNUSUAL is the headline of the thread.Isn't it ....
According to law, license for flying kite is necessary. But the law is inoperative practically and nobody knows this. Possibly, there is no authority to whom you may apply for flying kites. In fact, there are thousands of such legal provisions that neither the citizens nor police are aware of. One day, I came across a book that is a compilation of various legislation. Most of these are obsolete and not commonly known even to advocates and judiciary
But I thing for law students it is must to read these obsolete laws.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Indian Air Force is not at full strength and this is a grave handicap when facing China/.
vijay wrote:
I wonder how much time is being unproductively spent by many members in blaming Nehru and his descendents. Even if one were to agree with the solidly biased opinions made without basis and research and on hearsay what is being gained. Nehru led India when it was at its lowest point in economy and he or anyone in his place could not have made India a military power . Today we are the largest armaments buyers in the world because our economy is able to bear the expense and yet the infiltrators walk in. That should be the issue. How to make India stronger should be debated. Nehru bashing is not going to lead anywhere except making some babus and singhs happy again and again.
Vijay, first thing we are not blaming Nehru Ji, he is respected leader of India who sacrifice enough for the freedom. We are only debating about his policies. India is not capable in manufacturing armaments so it have only one alternates to buy from others. Now India is enough strong country and also needs of whole world. Nehru ji was founder of Non alliance group but after defeat from China he wrote letter to USA President for supply of armaments, and it was President of USA who stop Pakistan to attack on India when India was struggling with China. Hopeless non alliance group!
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
suni51 wrote:
All such people behaving in such a hateful manner have no right to stay in open and if someone wants me to brand a BJP party follower that I am certainly not but I speak for my country. When a BJP member talks bad I react in the same way. It's high time we forget all about party affiliations and work for our nation or wait for the dooms day. After all what kind of freedom of expression is that which speaks ill against our own Mother-Nation? I hail the judgement of the Delhi High Court.
You are much annoyed on Delhi High court judgement. But it is interim judgement not final one. Still courts of India is raise of hope. for one moment if we accept that president of JNU did not rays anti India slogan than who did it. He is president of JNU and also host of that meeting. for any wrong thing he is prime facia responsible. Now it is his duty to trace persons who raise slogan. One more question he called meeting to gloryfy Afzal, why he did not call meeting to pay homage to martyr, brave security personal of India who sacrifice their life to save to honor and grace of temple of India's democracy, " The Parliament.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Dowry and alimony.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
Asking for dowry is a crime but it is still prevalent in our society. The girl's side must not give dowry in any circumstance because the men who accept dowry in marriage are not worthy to get married. Now, comes the question of alimony, regarding it I will second @usha manohar's opinion but with a minor twist. I would prefer ladies not to accept alimony from their husband with whom their relationship has gone sour and by doing so their self respect will rise. Yes, there are some circumstances when the divorced ladies are left with no choice and are willingly/unwillingly have to accept alimony. On the other hand I am against those ladies who file false cases to harass the husband and the in-laws. They in no way deserve alimony but if their is a child in between then certainly the man as a father has a responsibility towards his child so for his/her sake one must take care of the child's need such as education and all other requirements.
Like I said before it is not at all an easy matter to get alimony because family courts deliberate and after a lot of considerations think of granting alimony, so there is no question of any false case being encouraged by the court , which is as it is , is prejudiced against women !
It seems you got me a little wrong. I did not mean that court will encourage false case for alimony. I was talking about the fake domestic violence cases filed by the wives and when it gets proved that the wife's accusation was false then in that case divorce should be granted to the husband and alimony should not be given to her. That should be her punishment for ruining an entire family only because of her selfish desire.
I am agree with you if some one file false case against husband than after divorce wife have not any right of alimony but she must be punished for defamation of husband. Only hard punishment can stop misuse of any law.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic How funny can a religion be. .
Jincy Aby wrote:
anil wrote:
Lust for daughter of a father is evil for Hindus and I think also for followers of other religion. It is surprsing that huge of engaged couple is evil but lust of father for daughter is right one.
Religious leaders are making new laws without asking the opinion of other people of the community. Actually these leaders have like these bad thinking in their mind. In order to make them as practice, they come with new laws.
Not all leaders of all religions but only one, and followers of this religion can't not speak any thing against these leaders. it is evil to oppose religious leaders in this religion.
9 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Dowry and alimony.
Alimony is given by spouses to each other as the case may be by court orders. Children are ordered to provide support to their neglected parents and it is not called alimony.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Dirty politics and vendetta by the grand old party !.
usha manohar wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
It's true bureaucrats should be tried too for following illegal orders. They should have the guts to protest but the point is they fear for their lives as well as of their dear ones. They loose trust and so they fail to understand whose door to knock for justice. They actually become the puppets and when the head is the culprit then they loose confidence and strength to garner courage to oppose the system.
Bureaucrats are helpless to obey illegal orders of politicians. Bureaucrats are also human beings and have their families. You may know about IAS Khemka of Haryana, how he was torcher by politicians. Average transfer after six months!
Not many want to go through that so they end up being politicians chelas...In Karnataka, yesterday the power minister D K Shivakumar who is a known corrupt goonda with many charges pending against him, got angry because a trader from Sulia close to Mangalore called him directly to know about the power situation. The trader apparently called him many times because the minister kept cutting his calls instead of listening to him, finally the trader was put in jail on harrassment charges against the minister. This is the kind of politicians that India has been breeding over the decades..
yes most are like it, but here hope of rays also we have, "Suresh Prabhu"
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani created new topic How you view mythology!.
Politics is broadly divided as Left and Right. How you decide whether you are Left, Right or Centrist.
Here is a way. Here is a chart depending on your views on mythology. As I don't have any faith in mythology, which means only 'myth (untrue) , I can't decide whether I am Left or Right.
9 years ago
rambabu wrote:
MG Singh wrote:I will take whatever Prashant Bhusan says with a pinch of salt. This is the same man who talked of atrocities of Indian army in Kashmir and advocated freedom. He was thrashed for this in his chamber. Even at that time Kejriwal distanced himself from Bhushan. Bhushan is the man who insisted on a midnight session of Supreme court for Afzal Guru hanging annulment.take what he says with a pinch of salt.
Persons like Prashant Bhusan are, without spine.
I know the full history of Prashant Bhushan . A person who demanded midnight session of the Supreme court for Afzal Guru hanging annulment is more dangerous than Afzal Guru. Though he was thrashed, Prashant did not learn the lesson. A shameless traitor. He is the one who actually needs whipping.
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar replied to the topic Dowry and alimony.
I guess the Times of India reporters do not know that alimony is given only to spouses and not parents! Alimony, support, maintenance, call it whatever you like, it amounts to the same thing and that is 'to provide financial support to the ones who are left holding the wrong end of the stick.' So what problem is there if 'alimony' is paid to parents instead of support?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Old-parents-can-get-alimony-too/articleshow/611401.cms
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Dowry and alimony.
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
Asking for dowry is a crime but it is still prevalent in our society. The girl's side must not give dowry in any circumstance because the men who accept dowry in marriage are not worthy to get married. Now, comes the question of alimony, regarding it I will second @usha manohar's opinion but with a minor twist. I would prefer ladies not to accept alimony from their husband with whom their relationship has gone sour and by doing so their self respect will rise. Yes, there are some circumstances when the divorced ladies are left with no choice and are willingly/unwillingly have to accept alimony. On the other hand I am against those ladies who file false cases to harass the husband and the in-laws. They in no way deserve alimony but if their is a child in between then certainly the man as a father has a responsibility towards his child so for his/her sake one must take care of the child's need such as education and all other requirements.
Like I said before it is not at all an easy matter to get alimony because family courts deliberate and after a lot of considerations think of granting alimony, so there is no question of any false case being encouraged by the court , which is as it is , is prejudiced against women !
It seems you got me a little wrong. I did not mean that court will encourage false case for alimony. I was talking about the fake domestic violence cases filed by the wives and when it gets proved that the wife's accusation was false then in that case divorce should be granted to the husband and alimony should not be given to her. That should be her punishment for ruining an entire family only because of her selfish desire.
I am agree with you if some one file false case against husband than after divorce wife have not any right of alimony but she must be punished for defamation of husband. Only hard punishment can stop misuse of any law.
Exactly, this is what I want to say. Be it a man or a woman, no one has the right to defame another family and ruin their lives. Kill one and get away with it. Yes, I know that in India women are mainly the sufferers of bad marriage and I have all my feelings with them but I am not with those women who misuse the law and spoil some innocent lives and vice versa. I have seen many cases like this and I can't accept and forgive people of this kind so I want them to be punished be it a man or a woman.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Let's discuss facts.
vijay wrote:
So what is wrong in it. Why should your way be the only way.
Difference of opinion is acceptable but for that one should not indulge into killing. That needs to be criticised. One may support Godse's opinion but his expression of protest was not a worthy one.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
anil wrote:
suni51 wrote:
All such people behaving in such a hateful manner have no right to stay in open and if someone wants me to brand a BJP party follower that I am certainly not but I speak for my country. When a BJP member talks bad I react in the same way. It's high time we forget all about party affiliations and work for our nation or wait for the dooms day. After all what kind of freedom of expression is that which speaks ill against our own Mother-Nation? I hail the judgement of the Delhi High Court.
You are much annoyed on Delhi High court judgement. But it is interim judgement not final one. Still courts of India is raise of hope. for one moment if we accept that president of JNU did not rays anti India slogan than who did it. He is president of JNU and also host of that meeting. for any wrong thing he is prime facia responsible. Now it is his duty to trace persons who raise slogan. One more question he called meeting to gloryfy Afzal, why he did not call meeting to pay homage to martyr, brave security personal of India who sacrifice their life to save to honor and grace of temple of India's democracy, " The Parliament.
JNU is one such university where regularly various kind of discussions and meetings take place. Are we aware of each and every such meetings? Can you name any Indian student from JNU who turned out to be a criminal or a terrorist? Rather we have greats from this university. It is true, the judge gave bail with many conditions and it's natural because it is yet to be proved who was behind all the activities. Let us wait for the other findings. If he was wrong then he should be punished otherwise not and I think we on this forum should remain open.
9 years ago
MG Singh liked a reply to the topic Introduction of Flogging as a punishment for some offences where a simple jail term has no meaning.
9 years ago
MG Singh replied to the topic Indian Air Force is not at full strength and this is a grave handicap when facing China/.
anil wrote:
vijay wrote:
I wonder how much time is being unproductively spent by many members in blaming Nehru and his descendents. Even if one were to agree with the solidly biased opinions made without basis and research and on hearsay what is being gained. Nehru led India when it was at its lowest point in economy and he or anyone in his place could not have made India a military power . Today we are the largest armaments buyers in the world because our economy is able to bear the expense and yet the infiltrators walk in. That should be the issue. How to make India stronger should be debated. Nehru bashing is not going to lead anywhere except making some babus and singhs happy again and again.
Vijay, first thing we are not blaming Nehru Ji, he is respected leader of India who sacrifice enough for the freedom. We are only debating about his policies. India is not capable in manufacturing armaments so it have only one alternates to buy from others. Now India is enough strong country and also needs of whole world. Nehru ji was founder of Non alliance group but after defeat from China he wrote letter to USA President for supply of armaments, and it was President of USA who stop Pakistan to attack on India when India was struggling with China. Hopeless non alliance group!
Nehru was a idealist and thus never understood power politics and famous Mao quote ' power comes out of a barrel of a gun'. He had a chance to be greatest leader in Asia but in ultimate analysis flunked. Why we cannot forget Nehru because he saddled India for ever with kashmir problem and lost territory to China. He reduced India to a second rate power. Hero worship of Nehru must stop as he left problems for Indians that can never be solved for next 100 years.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Dirty politics and vendetta by the grand old party !.
vijay wrote:
Politicians indulge in corruption because they are greedy, officers join or submit because they have to save their families, we are helpless and so have to tolerate. Great nations are not made this way.
It's very true that great nations are not made like this but we are helpless. The political circle has to be honest and selfless then only it will send a strong positive message to the citizens which includes the government officials who will have faith in the system and perform their duty accordingly.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic India finally coming to terms with its population...
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Kalyani Nandurkar wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
I agree that population control should be done consistently regardless of religion, only then can it be effective... Christian families too tended to be very large although , now they are aware of the practical difficulties of having too many children and have consciously been bringing down the size of their families which is a good size...The educated muslims too have realised the advantage small family gives them but it is a different matter in villages and in uneducated families
True Usha, more and more educated families now realize the importance of having less children and are doing so of their own will, but still even in cities there are many families who are educated but still refuse to adopt control measures. I closely now a family where he daughter's first born son was diagnosed with a congenital heart valve, instead of focusing on his treatment, her in-laws forced her to have two more sons, in addition to first 2 sons and a daughter, and now with 5 children, he has been sent back to her parents. Her father is a retired engineer from MES and all these people are well educated. But her in-laws won't accept her back saying she has a curse on her head just because of the first born son's condition. Not to mention, the family is Muslim!
Yes it is still not 100% ...My sister who is a gynecologist goes to villages with their mobile unit and there have been times when they have been threatened and abused by muslim men because their wives were advised on family planning by the doctors..They had to lodge a police complaint once because these men would not let them work in the village which comprises of all religious groups ..
India is big country and 100% is not possible. Hindus are serious about size of family even in rural area. They understand that more children, more pieces of their lands. Gradully Muslim will also understand this fact that small family in favor of them and their children.
I agree with you. I also agree with Usha and Kalyani on the importance of smaller families. What I think is a change in attitude of the people started. As you said, because of the vastness of the country, the small change will not look conspicuously. The much needed Small Family norm will take time, though not immediately, . I have seen , this change of attitude is visible even in orthodox Muslim families.
Yes it will take time, government is also doing enough in this field. Cash awards for sterilization is effective one.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic some unusual law .
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Jincy Aby wrote:
Flying kite is one of the interesting activities among children. Even small children can fly kite very easily. I don't understand why there is license for flying kite. Will they punish the little cute children whether they fly kite for enjoyment? Really a funny law.
If the cute and little children can fly a kite, of course they too are punishable. Because it's a law. It may look strange to many, even if the law looks and sounds strange, it has to be obeyed. Then "UNUSUAL is the headline of the thread.Isn't it ....
According to law, license for flying kite is necessary. But the law is inoperative practically and nobody knows this. Possibly, there is no authority to whom you may apply for flying kites. In fact, there are thousands of such legal provisions that neither the citizens nor police are aware of. One day, I came across a book that is a compilation of various legislation. Most of these are obsolete and not commonly known even to advocates and judiciary
But I thing for law students it is must to read these obsolete laws.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Indian Air Force is not at full strength and this is a grave handicap when facing China/.
vijay wrote:
I wonder how much time is being unproductively spent by many members in blaming Nehru and his descendents. Even if one were to agree with the solidly biased opinions made without basis and research and on hearsay what is being gained. Nehru led India when it was at its lowest point in economy and he or anyone in his place could not have made India a military power . Today we are the largest armaments buyers in the world because our economy is able to bear the expense and yet the infiltrators walk in. That should be the issue. How to make India stronger should be debated. Nehru bashing is not going to lead anywhere except making some babus and singhs happy again and again.
Vijay, first thing we are not blaming Nehru Ji, he is respected leader of India who sacrifice enough for the freedom. We are only debating about his policies. India is not capable in manufacturing armaments so it have only one alternates to buy from others. Now India is enough strong country and also needs of whole world. Nehru ji was founder of Non alliance group but after defeat from China he wrote letter to USA President for supply of armaments, and it was President of USA who stop Pakistan to attack on India when India was struggling with China. Hopeless non alliance group!
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
suni51 wrote:
All such people behaving in such a hateful manner have no right to stay in open and if someone wants me to brand a BJP party follower that I am certainly not but I speak for my country. When a BJP member talks bad I react in the same way. It's high time we forget all about party affiliations and work for our nation or wait for the dooms day. After all what kind of freedom of expression is that which speaks ill against our own Mother-Nation? I hail the judgement of the Delhi High Court.
You are much annoyed on Delhi High court judgement. But it is interim judgement not final one. Still courts of India is raise of hope. for one moment if we accept that president of JNU did not rays anti India slogan than who did it. He is president of JNU and also host of that meeting. for any wrong thing he is prime facia responsible. Now it is his duty to trace persons who raise slogan. One more question he called meeting to gloryfy Afzal, why he did not call meeting to pay homage to martyr, brave security personal of India who sacrifice their life to save to honor and grace of temple of India's democracy, " The Parliament.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Dowry and alimony.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
Asking for dowry is a crime but it is still prevalent in our society. The girl's side must not give dowry in any circumstance because the men who accept dowry in marriage are not worthy to get married. Now, comes the question of alimony, regarding it I will second @usha manohar's opinion but with a minor twist. I would prefer ladies not to accept alimony from their husband with whom their relationship has gone sour and by doing so their self respect will rise. Yes, there are some circumstances when the divorced ladies are left with no choice and are willingly/unwillingly have to accept alimony. On the other hand I am against those ladies who file false cases to harass the husband and the in-laws. They in no way deserve alimony but if their is a child in between then certainly the man as a father has a responsibility towards his child so for his/her sake one must take care of the child's need such as education and all other requirements.
Like I said before it is not at all an easy matter to get alimony because family courts deliberate and after a lot of considerations think of granting alimony, so there is no question of any false case being encouraged by the court , which is as it is , is prejudiced against women !
It seems you got me a little wrong. I did not mean that court will encourage false case for alimony. I was talking about the fake domestic violence cases filed by the wives and when it gets proved that the wife's accusation was false then in that case divorce should be granted to the husband and alimony should not be given to her. That should be her punishment for ruining an entire family only because of her selfish desire.
I am agree with you if some one file false case against husband than after divorce wife have not any right of alimony but she must be punished for defamation of husband. Only hard punishment can stop misuse of any law.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic How funny can a religion be. .
Jincy Aby wrote:
anil wrote:
Lust for daughter of a father is evil for Hindus and I think also for followers of other religion. It is surprsing that huge of engaged couple is evil but lust of father for daughter is right one.
Religious leaders are making new laws without asking the opinion of other people of the community. Actually these leaders have like these bad thinking in their mind. In order to make them as practice, they come with new laws.
Not all leaders of all religions but only one, and followers of this religion can't not speak any thing against these leaders. it is evil to oppose religious leaders in this religion.
9 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Dowry and alimony.
Alimony is given by spouses to each other as the case may be by court orders. Children are ordered to provide support to their neglected parents and it is not called alimony.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Dirty politics and vendetta by the grand old party !.
usha manohar wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
It's true bureaucrats should be tried too for following illegal orders. They should have the guts to protest but the point is they fear for their lives as well as of their dear ones. They loose trust and so they fail to understand whose door to knock for justice. They actually become the puppets and when the head is the culprit then they loose confidence and strength to garner courage to oppose the system.
Bureaucrats are helpless to obey illegal orders of politicians. Bureaucrats are also human beings and have their families. You may know about IAS Khemka of Haryana, how he was torcher by politicians. Average transfer after six months!
Not many want to go through that so they end up being politicians chelas...In Karnataka, yesterday the power minister D K Shivakumar who is a known corrupt goonda with many charges pending against him, got angry because a trader from Sulia close to Mangalore called him directly to know about the power situation. The trader apparently called him many times because the minister kept cutting his calls instead of listening to him, finally the trader was put in jail on harrassment charges against the minister. This is the kind of politicians that India has been breeding over the decades..
yes most are like it, but here hope of rays also we have, "Suresh Prabhu"
9 years ago