OpenMeans Forum

Guest
Welcome, Guest

Recent activity

Shampa Sadhya wrote: usha manohar wrote: Kalyani Nandurkar wrote: usha manohar wrote: I am surprised that people only remember the match fixing charges but do not know the fact that Sreeshant was absolved  of all the charges levelled against him.. I am sure you might have guessed the reason by now, if he was fielding for the congressis, no one would have objected or raise such questions! LOL That's my feeling too...lol @ Shampa Sreesanth is still banned by BCCI so when he is not eligible to play for India or domestic cricket then how can he be a right choice to serve people is beyond my understanding  Two points here, according to you BCCI is supetior to Delhi court and if Sreeshant plays cricket he is the right choice,.. Neither of the two. I feel any person who is about to contest an election should not even have a little bit of controversial history. That's it! Well, as everyone has his/her own opinion regarding an issue so do I have which is entirely based upon morality but I must stress on one fact that my opinion has nothing to do with BJP or Congress. If Congress had given him the ticket then also I would have started this kind of a thread for discussion. There is no logic in your argument. First of all like propr get like keaders , none of us is Paragon's of virtue, wr all have some shortcomings snd the more fsmoud youcare the more it gets highlighted . If you look around, you will find many of the elected reps have some negative aspects or the other. Singling out Sreeshant and BJP is therefore unfair ESP after he had been absolved of all charges.
9 years ago
Shreesant is a bad choice. The BJP always picks up such people. Firstly hema malini broke a house and became a second wife by converting to Islam and she is a BJP  MP. What example she is setting to women of India?Even Vinod Khanna has many sleletons. BJp's choice of candidates is poor.
9 years ago
 I am surprised at this topic. I wonder how anyone can demand an extra payment. In case one feels remuneration is not enough, why not try some other sites and see that firstly whether your article is accepted.
9 years ago
vijay wrote: One thing which many in India seen to be lacking is in self confidence including those who served for 3 generations  in the army incl. British army. If 100 crore Hindus are afraid of 20 odd crore Muslims then what can be done. Parliament and Supreme Courts have to do their duty. All will fall in line. The muslim mania of many is creating imaginary demons. Everything seems to be muslim centric. Even USA is to be judged by attitude of Trump towards muslims. Many have predicted break up of China as it's citizen want democracy sooner or later. Ok stop being a scare crow all the time and stop imaginary battles. thank you Vijay, I enjoy a verbal and written joust with you. Bear in mind that only 100,000 Britishers controlled a population of 350 million and only about 50000 Muslims controlled 100 million Hindus. This was based on the axiom" fear is the Key". This  is a fact  and is brought out in Freedom at Midnight byLapaire and Indian history by Duff. So 100 cr can be controled by 20 cr easily as Hindus are divided by caste and creed.   
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote: I have another fear. The minorities only need some degree of autonomy and freedom from interference in their affairs. Nothing else. If the fascist Hindu communal forces are not restrained and they go with their agenda, there will be disastrous results.  I will remind you that  The term Fascism was first used of the totalitarian right wing nationalist regime of Mussolini in Italy (1922–43); the regimes of the Nazi  in Germany.Fascism tends to include a belief in the supremacy of one national or ethenic  group> Where is it? I dont see in India  and no foreigner sees it also other than you and the Congress. Come man dont use words for the sake of using like Fascism etc.  
9 years ago
Nowadays, in every crime we get to see that there is one or more than one juvenile is involved. Should they be left free only because they are juveniles though they are murderers, rapists, burglars and what not? In Delhi a dentist got killed by juveniles on a trivial issue which once again made me think why a criminal be treated lightly even after a heinous crime just because he/she is a juvenile. The link about the incident: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Mob-drags-Delhi-dentist-out-of-home-kills-him-in-front-of-son/articleshow/51557157.cms 
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote: Jinnah and Sawarkar believed in two nation theory. Noted poet and philosopher Mohd. Iqbal was the ideologue of the theory that Muslims are nation. But his philosophy of Muslim nation was not just a geographical concept.  For him all Muslims wherever they are form nation. The Muslims worldwide are one community or nation called 'Ummah'  Jinnah was persuaded constantly by Iqbal to play an active role in creating an Islamic state.  Jinnah is just one side of the theocratic state notion. In fact, Hindu Maha Sabha and R.S.S. are the main players in this mischief. They sowed seeds of hatred. In fact, Jinnah was himself not an orthodox Muslim. He was not aggressive but feared that Muslims in Hindu India would be reduced to second grade citizenship. This belief was not entirely unfounded. I heard that during British period, at Railway station, there were separate tumblers for tea. The tumbler used by Muslims would not be used by Hindus. So we had Hinduani tea and Musalmani tea.  Drinking water was also served to Muslims and lower Hindu caste persons through long bamboo pipe. We must maintain secular ideals. I don't feel that Muslims need any further division. But the Hindu fanatics in name of so called Hindu Rashtra are creating circumstances for further division not only on religious basis but also on caste basis. Recent issues of Mahishasur worship and campaign against burning of Holka are pointers. All secular forces must unite and act fast to defeat the grand design of Hindutva forces to divide tha nation and force another divisions or divisions.   So nice to have a discussion with you. Firstly how do you relate Hindutva with BJP and Sangh? Hindutava is defined as " An ideology seeking to establish the hegemony of Hindus and the Hindu way of life."  This is not the monopoly of the BJP and any Hindu or resident of India can believe in it. I am a Sikh, but I find nothing objectionable in Hindutava. to keep calling Hindutava a fascist concept is something I cannot understand. In the USA and UK the constitution is based on Christian principles and all live there, same with Hindutava, which is akin to the old golden aage. Remember BJp is not a party that can bring Hindutava as it failed in all its election promises.  
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar wrote: Dr. Simran, this kind of  discrepancy in earnings is shown for everyone most times. But do not worry about losing money, it has never happened to any one and I can assure you that will not happen in future too. It just takes time for the admin to get all the earnings on the level. Absolutely true! My member of the week was adding up regularly but total earning remained same for almost 2 to 3 months. I thought to use the recalculate option as suggested but somehow I kept quiet without any such measure and yesterday all of a sudden I found that everything has been calculated properly and the total earning is perfect now. So, there is nothing to worry at all.
9 years ago
Tomorrow 27th march Prime minister Modi coming to my homeland kharagpur
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar wrote: @Babu Saroj, If i really did an introspection myself, then I would have to reject all your articles because they are so substandard and contain so many errors that for one small article of yours which should not take more than 5 minutes, I have to spend more than 10 minutes, half the time spent on trying to just understand what you write. If you wish, do take an opinion poll with respect to quality of your articles and see where you stand, before accusing editors of wasting your hard work. Let me tell you that the article which you are talking about took me 1 hour to write , that's why i am begging to admin to make atleast rs. 15. Yeah i am a slow typer    
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote: Shampa Sadhya wrote: Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote: Possibly the articles receiving Rs. 5/ or 8/- must be such as are not worth publishing but the admin is just giving some consolation. I feel that minimum amount should be Rs. 50/-  Any article deserving lesser amount should be considered sub standard and not approved.  If any article does not qualify to get Rs. 50/- should be considered as substandard cannot be a right judgement. To qualify for the minimum amount the site should lay down some fixed criteria such as word limit, error free article or minimum mistakes, must have headings and subheadings and so on. Without some fixed conditions the writers cannot understand the requirement of the site.  There is minimum 300 words requirement for article. The guidelines for writing articles are given in the site itself. It should be appreciated that an article is not like mathematics and so it is not possible to give rigid criterion. Apart from words limit, an article should be grammatically correct, not copied, properly formatted  and presentable. An article need not be merely informative as all information is available on web sites. an author should give his own original thoughts and opinion with reasons, divide article in paragraphs and give sub headings to these. It will be best to read the articles first to get an idea about model articles. Thanks for the details and the given criteria are well known but suppose you reject an article and consider it as substandard then I feel it would be of great help if you convey the reasons in a well defined manner. I know it will be an extra pressure on the editors still it's a humble request because it will help the writers to asses their write-up in a much better way. Even if you are giving a minimum amount then also the reason should be mentioned or else we writers will never try to asses our fault and accuse the editors.
9 years ago
Dr. Simran, this kind of  discrepancy in earnings is shown for everyone most times. But do not worry about losing money, it has never happened to any one and I can assure you that will not happen in future too. It just takes time for the admin to get all the earnings on the level.
9 years ago
Dr. Simran Kaur said thank you to suni51 for his/her reply to the topic Showing incorrect earnings, please correct them.
Click recalculate button on your dashboard and wait for half an hour. There is another possibility that not all earning have yet been added by system which will be added on next update.
9 years ago
usha manohar wrote: Kalyani Nandurkar wrote: usha manohar wrote: I am surprised that people only remember the match fixing charges but do not know the fact that Sreeshant was absolved  of all the charges levelled against him.. I am sure you might have guessed the reason by now, if he was fielding for the congressis, no one would have objected or raise such questions! LOL That's my feeling too...lol @ Shampa Sreesanth is still banned by BCCI so when he is not eligible to play for India or domestic cricket then how can he be a right choice to serve people is beyond my understanding  Two points here, according to you BCCI is supetior to Delhi court and if Sreeshant plays cricket he is the right choice,.. Neither of the two. I feel any person who is about to contest an election should not even have a little bit of controversial history. That's it! Well, as everyone has his/her own opinion regarding an issue so do I have which is entirely based upon morality but I must stress on one fact that my opinion has nothing to do with BJP or Congress. If Congress had given him the ticket then also I would have started this kind of a thread for discussion.
9 years ago
The present Central Government is unfortunately giving too much importance to playing one religion against another, and trying to divide the country on communal basis. What we need is the urgent need to revitalize the rural areas and give our farmers the scape to grow.  It is in this context that the so-called initiatives of the Union Government need to be reviewed. Little has been done, though the Union budget of 2016, is trying to reverse the trend.  Economists, social scientists, environment experts and the technocrats have to chip in with suggestions, which are really viable, to increase creation of jobs at every stage and in every possible area. For example, some good start ups like Practo, Paytm, Flipkart and the like have given employment to several thousands of educated Indians.  What is needed is a great deal of creativity in tapping the unmet needs that needs to be explored even more.  Brain-storming of a very tall order is also called for. What we need to urgently do is to focus on real action and work out suggestions that will lead to meaningful and viable results.  
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar wrote: usha manohar wrote: I am surprised that people only remember the match fixing charges but do not know the fact that Sreeshant was absolved  of all the charges levelled against him.. I am sure you might have guessed the reason by now, if he was fielding for the congressis, no one would have objected or raise such questions! LOL @Kalyani, I don't know about others but I have started this thread with a doubt in my mind is not because I am Congress supporter. Till date if you have followed my comments I have never sided with any political party, it's because I am very much disinterested in politics and you can say my knowledge is also very little about politics. I felt it's not morally right and so put forward my viewpoint.   
9 years ago
today its very confusing, we cannot percept any politicians as good or bad as we don't know them clearly from inside. so i really got confused in matters whom to vote or not.  
9 years ago
i don't get why people do such things which they shouldn't do, whereas about sreesanth i think he didn't know the spelling of p in politics. 
9 years ago
@Babu Saroj, If i really did an introspection myself, then I would have to reject all your articles because they are so substandard and contain so many errors that for one small article of yours which should not take more than 5 minutes, I have to spend more than 10 minutes, half the time spent on trying to just understand what you write. If you wish, do take an opinion poll with respect to quality of your articles and see where you stand, before accusing editors of wasting your hard work.  
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya wrote: rambabu wrote: anil wrote: Shampa Sadhya wrote: As Gavaskar said that Bangladesh batsmen tried glamour shot which was not required at all. So, they lost because of their inexperience. Though India won, their performance was not at all up to the mark. Yes I am agree with, team India won but not like a champion. he done some mistake in this match.  Every time  winning like a champion is not possible. many factors are to be taken in to consideration. For example pitch conditions, weather conditions and the crowd behavior play a vital role in preventing even a champion like India in its original form.  In my view, India's win on Bangladesh, though by a single run, is no less than a Great Win. Obviously, last three balls made India look like a champion but during the early part of the game India's performance was shabby. Still, every Indian knows that it may happen like that with any team but India has the strength and the spirit to come back and perform like a champion. yeah if they want to win with single in there last 3 balls then i think they could have won this match with an ease, all they try is to win with a boundary mainly hitting a six. and which makes to pay.
9 years ago