OpenMeans Forum

Guest
Welcome, Guest

Recent activity

For me, 1, Mera saya 2. Who kon thi. 3. Anita.  Music of Mera saya and Who kon tho both are great one. But court scenes of Mera Saya make it better that who kon thi. Nano Mai Badra Chaye is most greatest song from Madan Mohan and Lata.
9 years ago
anil answered the question Only Dark Clouds can rain......
Black clouds gave us pleasure in summer when we are wet with sweat. Black is most likable color for party wearing. than how black in good one.
9 years ago
I don't know too much but I read that if wife remarried after divorce, she have not right of alimony, than it is possible to have right in property.
9 years ago
Age is not only one cause of hair loss. I am 55 years old but I have hair on my whole head. I think hereditary and stress is main cause of losing and white hair.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya wrote: rambabu wrote: anil wrote: Shampa Sadhya wrote: As Gavaskar said that Bangladesh batsmen tried glamour shot which was not required at all. So, they lost because of their inexperience. Though India won, their performance was not at all up to the mark. Yes I am agree with, team India won but not like a champion. he done some mistake in this match.    Every time  winning like a champion is not possible. many factors are to be taken in to consideration. For example pitch conditions, weather conditions and the crowd behavior play a vital role in preventing even a champion like India in its original form.  In my view, India's win on Bangladesh, though by a single run, is no less than a Great Win. Obviously, last three balls made India look like a champion but during the early part of the game India's performance was shabby. Still, every Indian knows that it may happen like that with any team but India has the strength and the spirit to come back and perform like a champion. I am also wishing that India will perform after 3 hours against Aus. like a champion, So we can watch more match of team India.  
9 years ago
rambabu wrote: anil wrote: Shampa Sadhya wrote: As Gavaskar said that Bangladesh batsmen tried glamour shot which was not required at all. So, they lost because of their inexperience. Though India won, their performance was not at all up to the mark. Yes I am agree with, team India won but not like a champion. he done some mistake in this match.    Every time  winning like a champion is not possible. many factors are to be taken in to consideration. For example pitch conditions, weather conditions and the crowd behavior play a vital role in preventing even a champion like India in its original form. In my view, India's win on Bangladesh, though by a single run, is no less than a Great Win. yes not doubt result of match is not based on any single factor. yes India won and it is great if it is great what you say to 4 victory of Neziland?       
9 years ago
usha manohar wrote: Even in council elections and district level elections you see money and liquor flow. Recently we had district level elections and the Congress party went berserk , even after all that circus it could not win majority. I guess people have become smart and grab what they get and vote who they want! this practice also increased i village election. It because of MHANAREGA. Candidates of sarpach and panch are spending hug amount to won the match, although gram panchyats have any major source of earning, but MHANAREGA is Gangotri of rupees.  
9 years ago
Babu saroj wrote: today its very confusing, we cannot percept any politicians as good or bad as we don't know them clearly from inside. so i really got confused in matters whom to vote or not. If you are confused to whom vote or not, press NATO   
9 years ago
Gulshan ji it is right to create communal assets but with street toilets toilet is home is necessary. Focus on public transport is an important sector. Air pollution is a serious problem. More that 60% population of India is living is rural area and depends of agriculture and other job associated with agriculture. Condition of farmers are not good. They are not getting reasonable prices for their crops. It is not possible for government to give them employment is urban area. So for improvement of economy of country government must be focus on employment in rural area.
9 years ago
I like travelling to much. I visited Rohtangpass when I was only 15 years old. Break from routine work is very important to recharge ourself and travelling is best one option of it. India is country where every state have their own culture, tradition and eating habit. All these are enough for us to have a new experience.
9 years ago
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote: Mostly the juvenile crimes are related to low income groups. It is necessary to impart proper schooling and education to such potential juvenile criminals. Many children don't go to school but begin working with adults in restaurants, vehicle repair shops. They mix with adults since very childhood and lose their innocence. It is necessary to tackle the kissue from social and psychological angle. It is right that crimes by juveniles are not only problem of law and order, it is also social and psychological problem. Courts must be consider this fact while deciding cases of juveniles.    
9 years ago
anil liked a reply to the topic How to tackle juvenile criminals?.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya wrote: Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote: Possibly the articles receiving Rs. 5/ or 8/- must be such as are not worth publishing but the admin is just giving some consolation. I feel that minimum amount should be Rs. 50/-  Any article deserving lesser amount should be considered sub standard and not approved.  If any article does not qualify to get Rs. 50/- should be considered as substandard cannot be a right judgement. To qualify for the minimum amount the site should lay down some fixed criteria such as word limit, error free article or minimum mistakes, must have headings and subheadings and so on. Without some fixed conditions the writers cannot understand the requirement of the site.  I am agree with you, rejection of article is not fair for members. Site for minimum amount rules of writing articles can be amended.  
9 years ago
9 years ago
vijay wrote: Many years ago I read somewhere that in its history, the India of today and Pakistan and Bangladesh together were united for a maximum period of 120 years even when the religion was only Hinduism. Now we are in different times and India today is a pluralistic society.  It is the Constitution which unites and not religion. That religion is not a uniting force has been repeatedly demonstrated in region after region like Europe, West Asia. In these areas countries with singular religion are facing wars with each other. Maximum Muslims and Christians have been killed by themselves. Nearer home we saw recently how during Jat agitation non Jat Hindus were targeted or in Tamilnadu how upper caste persons brutally killed a lower caste person for marrying their woman. So religion is not and can not be a cementing factor. Modern times do give an opportunity to citizens irrespective of their religion, national;ity etc to come together and live happily as is demonstrated by USA. Keeping diverse elements together is a challenge and that is why the framers of our Constitution and leaders like Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, Azad stood tall despite many weaknesses. They were creators of an enabling atmosphere. However today an opposing ideology is gaining ground which wants to segment society for sake of votes, polarize sections for sake of domination, and so on. It also has supporters as any idea would have. What Jinnah said has no meaning today, the Supreme court is capable of overcoming such narrow minded forces and within Muslim community in India there is an upsurge to cleanse it of the very narrow views which make you afraid that India will be divided again. Indian people will not allow another division. The first was done by the British. I think equal opportunity is available for citizens of all religions. It is depends of the people how they exploit these. If our politician change their attitude we have not any problem of religion and cast.  
9 years ago
9 years ago
MG Singh wrote: Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote: Jinnah and Sawarkar believed in two nation theory. Noted poet and philosopher Mohd. Iqbal was the ideologue of the theory that Muslims are nation. But his philosophy of Muslim nation was not just a geographical concept.  For him all Muslims wherever they are form nation. The Muslims worldwide are one community or nation called 'Ummah'  Jinnah was persuaded constantly by Iqbal to play an active role in creating an Islamic state.  Jinnah is just one side of the theocratic state notion. In fact, Hindu Maha Sabha and R.S.S. are the main players in this mischief. They sowed seeds of hatred. In fact, Jinnah was himself not an orthodox Muslim. He was not aggressive but feared that Muslims in Hindu India would be reduced to second grade citizenship. This belief was not entirely unfounded. I heard that during British period, at Railway station, there were separate tumblers for tea. The tumbler used by Muslims would not be used by Hindus. So we had Hinduani tea and Musalmani tea.  Drinking water was also served to Muslims and lower Hindu caste persons through long bamboo pipe. We must maintain secular ideals. I don't feel that Muslims need any further division. But the Hindu fanatics in name of so called Hindu Rashtra are creating circumstances for further division not only on religious basis but also on caste basis. Recent issues of Mahishasur worship and campaign against burning of Holka are pointers. All secular forces must unite and act fast to defeat the grand design of Hindutva forces to divide tha nation and force another divisions or divisions.   So nice to have a discussion with you. Firstly how do you relate Hindutva with BJP and Sangh? Hindutava is defined as " An ideology seeking to establish the hegemony of Hindus and the Hindu way of life."  This is not the monopoly of the BJP and any Hindu or resident of India can believe in it. I am a Sikh, but I find nothing objectionable in Hindutava. to keep calling Hindutava a fascist concept is something I cannot understand. In the USA and UK the constitution is based on Christian principles and all live there, same with Hindutava, which is akin to the old golden aage. Remember BJp is not a party that can bring Hindutava as it failed in all its election promises. It is question is followers of BJP are only Hindu than what are followers of all other parties? Hindu is not a religion person who are living in this country are Hindu.    
9 years ago
Yes BJP is the ascendant party but it is not new. It has come to power in many states 15 to 20 years back.
9 years ago
Yes BJP is the ascendant party but it is not new. It has come to power in many states 15 to 20 years back.
9 years ago