There are a series of empirical attributes that have formulated the foundations of the laymen social infrastructure. The successful replication of any society champions a notion of ideals that seeks the establishment of its sovereignty within the composition of the international community. Invariably, a unified race of people must possess attributes distinguishing their integral attributes that identify perspectives of society, government, and justice. Concepts that formulate theories and ideological belief systems that intend to impact the way in which the individual proponent of the citizenry conducts its existence all within the framework of its social mainstream typically sustains a trail through-error-process pertaining to the conduction of its actual government as well as its societal evolution. Exposure to the real world allows an emerging social system the opportunity to demonstrate its overall viability to address the many social complexities that undermine the established base of social equilibrium ideally sought by those that intend to enhance its projected scale of longevity as a distinguishable member of the international community.

The most notable aspect that illuminates the greatest significance of the Marxist philosophy is its position on the initial evolution of human civilization. Since the establishment of the most primitive ancient civilization mankind has endured a continual class struggle that has been waged between the ruling elite (Bourgeoisie) and the working classes (Proletariat.) Invariably, the denominational aspects signifying the aspects of social class placements provides an essential self-explanatory definition that specifies which class enjoys greater influence over the other. In theory, the Bourgeoisie classes are those that manipulate the distribution of economic capital and the labor that rectifies its industrial/manufactured output. The class of the ruling elite constitutes a sharp minority that establishes its foundation at the peak of the social pyramid. Contrarily, the vast concentration signifying the integrity of a national citizenry is invested in the proletarian category. In reiteration from a previous point in this essay the working classes provide the structural element behind the mainstream face of industry and the integral composition of a national economy.

The national citizenry of any given sovereign nation-state invests the fundamental placement of its citizenry to the levels of the working classes. The functionality of any society requires a component working class which provides the necessary stimulation to every sphere of its infrastructure ensuring its continued existence and longevity. References made to the conduction of human history had reinforced the fact that the proletarian classes of a society are typically exploited by those entrusted with the affluent powers of the ruling elite. The masses of the proletarian classes depend on the good will of the ruling elite to ensure their own social sustainability and survivability. The Bourgeoisie provides the demand for labor that ensures that their social and economic aspirations are met. In so doing a balance is created between the two social classes that generate a sense of interchangeable dependency between the two. This perspective suggests that one social class is not able to function without the other.

The epitome of class struggle emanates an instrumental historical factor that has been consistently prevalent with the nature of mankind. Simply, Marx suggested had advocated for a series of political, economic, and social policies that rest in favor of the masses and those that have been bound by the Bourgeois demand of labor and subjected to its manipulative class oppression. The publicized work that proclaims these fundamentals are stated in the Communist Manifesto. Inasmuch one of the greatest significances of this work is connected to this ideological sentiment and remains consistent with the overall perception of the communist school of thought to the dawn of the twenty-first century. Marx had personally perceived that a proletarian revolution was only inevitable; however, he had forecasted its climatic undertaking within the social infrastructures of the societies of Western Europe; Great Britain, France, and Germany in particular. It would have simply baffled the most progressive theorists at the time of the publication of the Communist Manifesto to learn that the initial instigation of social class revolution would break ground across one of the most obscure nations of Europe, this being Czarist Russia. The continued struggle between these two ruling elites remains to this day. Arguably such divisions and indifferences between these two extremes in economic class placement will never cease to exist simply because its fundamental protocol remains constant with the true genuine definition illuminating human social conduction throughout the centuries.

The current standing of communism at the dawn of the twenty-first century is not even comparable to what it once used to be not even thirty years ago. Its international affluence and credibility had literally vanished overnight as those that were subjected to its social experiment openly testified its atrocities before the international mainstream. In its greatest proportional aspect the attainment of a completely classless society that would one day triumph the world over is best left to an envious aspiration from one that would retain an ideological orientation in the far left extreme. This does not necessarily suggest that its complete attainment is not possible before the integrity of a sovereign nation but would never be feasible for the rest of the outside world. One of the more appealing aspects that are championed by communism suggest that any given nation-state will require a centralized social structure ensuring political, economic, and social growth and efficiency. These three qualities represent the most integral components that exist as the essence behind any proclaimed aspect of sovereignty. As the rest of humanity is furthered propelled to the promises that have been made by science and technology it will nevertheless remain imperative that some degree of traditionalism remain in a firm foundation in order to provide a common base of reiteration signifying its historical values as well as references made to a coming of age period. Despite the aftereffects that have surrounded the ultimate collapse of Cold War communism and its eroding base of advocacy across the international mainstream, one can argue that such historical implications are necessary in order to illuminate the realities behind ideologies that are best left to the sheets of paper and mental philosophies in which they originate.