Is this article worth 10 cash credits?

I feel that at least the spelling mistakes can be avoided in the article.I also suggest the cash credits should not depend on the number of words alone but also the nature and popularity of the topic and the quality of the article.

The quality of the post is ofcourse not worth the cash credit granted at all.

Language is poor, though a good topic has been selected and good points have been made regarding it. I didn't get an idea of writing such articles too, but now I too will.

That's what the language so poor that it has wiped out the importance of the topic itself.

The language is indeed in need of improvement but I have seen even worse articles in the directory. I do not think it is necessary to raise such a hue and cry about it getting 10 cash credits!!

How can you say that if we are not pointing out the mistakes of the grantor of the cash credit how will he improvise in the future. So this not hue and cry Kalyani.

Jayen, I only expressed what I felt about the issue!!

Same here Kalyani I have expressed mines on your comment. :)

Its okay only language needs improvement, rest is okay......

Jayen,

MOst of the time the cash credits awarding is influenced by the rating to the article given by the editor, however some times there could be something goes wrong. We will take this as a positive feedback and improve ourself in awarding cash credits in the future. Thank you very much for pointing out this.

I think jayen's point about the language has to be taken in positive perspective because it makes our website better

Thanks for all your views I think a strong standard operating practice should be worked out by all editors to avoid such problems.

I too thank you for pointing out this issue,Jayen. :) :)

there are some spelling mistakes...and language needs improvement.......thanks jayen for bringing into consideration..

How to bring it to the notice of the author of the article?. :ohmy:

Although the language is poor, contents are useful and popular. so the cash credits. The cash credits would be more if the author had been more careful with grammar.

Yes, the language is very poor in this article.As Maverick had told the reply nothing to say.

Thanks for raising a point Jayen.... There might be many angles in which the editor sees the article. I agree with you that the language is poor. The editor might have felt that the article has more information in it. Or else; it might be a mistake(human error).
:)

Deepti wrote:
[quote]Thanks for raising a point Jayen.... There might be many angles in which the editor sees the article. I agree with you that the language is poor. The editor might have felt that the article has more information in it. Or else; it might be a mistake(human error).
:)[/quote]

There are many factors involved in approving and granting cash credits and points. Grammar is not the only factor. There is always room for difference of opinion in such matters. That is why usually, editor's decision is final.

Cash credit should be given to the quality of content written in an article and not to the total number of words written.