My suggesion for restriction on posting article

I do see some merit in your suggestion. If strict quality norms are laid down and adhered to, this problem can be substantially tackled. If any member is producing articles on a massive scale which are allegedly copied or not meeting the quality norm, only rejection at Boddunan's end would curb his exra zeal. And repeated rejection is going to produce a sobering effect.

Yes may be for a person who posts copied contents excessively, he might be restricted from posting further articles, till he finds time to post genuine ones. But, for general writers, there need not be any such restrictions.

Is this discussion pointing to some one ? In my opinion if found copied article according to the degree of theft he may be debarred maximum for a month.

What is the relation between rejection of articles and restricting the member from posting for another 2 days...?

If the member is found copying he / she should be penalized severely rather than imposing restrictions only.

Restriction will be one type of penalty for member they will realize it when it will implement.

So keep patient and try to accept some ideas from others.

Yes, perhaps the number of days restricted can be increased from 2 to 4 to 8 to 10 etc ... if article found to have copied content. in addition to cutting the cash credits..

Hello Santosh,

Please do not feel that I am negative person... You have forgotten- we met in another site (I am not naming that)...

There I was an Editor and looked after English section, ask expert, and others... I noticed you there also out of your postings in discussion forum...

I accept your suggestion...

- Harish Jharia

The suggestion is very apt. Rejection for copied material leading to restriction on further articles will definitely be a deterrant.