My this article has been rejected with the reason that it should be broken up into small paragraphs.
Now the question is whether the editors here are concerned only with presentation and not the substance.
The reason for rejection is not acceptable to me. Members and editors are requested to revisit the article at following link:
The article
20 Replies
Hello Jayen. You are talking about the rejection of article. An editor are concerned about both presentations and content. Non-formating can be the reason for rejection of your article. But you are not accepting this.
Now let me give you the reason on my behalf because i am also a editor on boddunan.
Your article is copied from other sites. So your article is not valid. Now i think there should be no issue from your side regarding article rejection. Here is the link of that website where this all content is presented.
http://www.aiftponline.org/journal/March10/Finance%20Bill%202010%20_1.htm
Now let me give you the reason on my behalf because i am also a editor on boddunan.
Your article is copied from other sites. So your article is not valid. Now i think there should be no issue from your side regarding article rejection. Here is the link of that website where this all content is presented.
http://www.aiftponline.org/journal/March10/Finance%20Bill%202010%20_1.htm
It is not fair to copy and then also complain about rejection. Te best way to write an article is first to decide the topic, then get data from various sites and form opinion on the issues involved. Then the facts and arguments with illustrations can be presented in own way without even looking at other sites. an article written this way will not be considered copied.
Jayen wrote:
[quote]Gulshan atleast read my reply first and than comment. I said I have written the article myself here and the site Lohit is refering may have copied the content from Boddunan.[/quote]
Jayen, please do not make statements that are vague. The website Lohit mentioned is an organization and such org websites do not copy from any websites. And more than that the article on that webbsite is posted in March. Did they copied your thoughts as well?
[quote]Gulshan atleast read my reply first and than comment. I said I have written the article myself here and the site Lohit is refering may have copied the content from Boddunan.[/quote]
Jayen, please do not make statements that are vague. The website Lohit mentioned is an organization and such org websites do not copy from any websites. And more than that the article on that webbsite is posted in March. Did they copied your thoughts as well?
Topic Author
J
Jayen
@jayen
Topic Stats
Created
Tuesday, 08 June 2010 13:41
Last Updated
Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies
0
Views
1.4K
Likes
0