How long will America fund terror?

We really don't know whether Pakistan is really using these money to curb/finish taliban and other terroist organisation (lashkar-e-toiba, jamad-ud-dawa)or it is using this money for carrying out attacks like the recently happened mumbai attacks or using this money for funding various organisation like ISI. So in my point we really can't say whether"AMERICA IS FUNDING TERROR"

Hello Sridhar Kesireddy,

Please talk about Pakistan. Involving USA for supporting terrorism is not right.

- Harish Jharia

From the above answer of Rajiv, (We really don't know whether Pakistan is really using these money to curb global terrorism or it is using this money for carrying anti Indian missions).
I wonder some one in India still have doubts about it. It is no more a hidden secret today.

Pakistani terrorism is a symptom, but the root cause of it is the hidden supporters behind these missions who support with arms, training and money. Originally who created the talibans.
How long we can ignore the root cause of global terrorism and try to control and concentrate on the symptoms.

Today the policy of some countries is that, as long as terrorists do not attack on their country and citizens, they do funding for them directly or indirectly and divert them upon to their rivals in the global economic war to create favourable conditions for their trade and progress.

I may be wrong in my opinion. Kindly discuss and correct me if so.

Sridhar Kesireddy

The private weapon manufacturers in U.S.A. find the terrorists everywhere as their potential customers. Only when U.s.a and other western countries face direct danger from these terrorist groups, they are alarmed.

United States is the most powerful fighter against terrorism. You are discouraging the anti-terror efforts being made by the USA.

If you want to criticise Pakistan... for running training camps, supporting terrorism by calling as jehaad (revolution), arranging for the hideouts for terrorists and funding them by cash and kind... then we can understand your view point. Nevertheless, the baseless criticism of USA is just looking childish.

Messages posted on internet are expected to be read by millions worldwide; hence, we have to follow constraints while hurling baseless accusation against a country like US that is working hard for fighting against terrorism.

Harish- U.S.A. fights terrorism as long as they directly face terror. The fact remains that they are not interested in sovereignty of India or International Law. The terrorists get weapons from American manufacturers.

Hello gulshan kumar ajmani,

Your posts are always good and decent and I do feel good responding to them. This one is also one such excellent post that I am responding.

The main arms and ammunition used in terrorism are mainly the Russian made Kalashnikov and the same made in the name of AK-47, AK-56 in many other names in china, Pakistan and other countries who support the cause of terrorism mainly Islamic, Naxal and those practised in the far east regions of India and Indian subcontinent.

Any country including India will retaliate only when we are affected and so is the case of US. They will also consume their national resources for the safety, security and well being of their country and the people of Unites states and its various interests.

US is not functioning as a global government to intervene in the security affairs of other countries.

Harish- many thanks for responding to my comments and appreciating these. I also read your views very carefully and I feel that my knowledge is enriched by reading your posts. Thanks again.

Thanks 'gulshan kumar ajmani' for the positive conclusive remark on this controversial issue of prejudices between the political ideologies viz 'Leftist' and the 'rightist' that has divided the world community.

The leftist ideology has lost its hold in the world after the disintegration of erstwhile USSR into a hundred plus countries.

It is always good for us to bring healthy discussions on sites and do creative brain-storming in order to gain some knowledge.