Which country has the best chances of winning the 2019 Cricket World Cup?
20 Replies
epraneeth77 wrote:anil wrote:I am sitting before TV and waiting when match will start. It is cricked no one know which player will play well and which play bad. We have hope of big innings from Kohli, Shikhar and Rohit.
South Africa lose their first 2 wickets cheaply, score being 32/2 after 8.4 overs.
But India have also missed some catches and a run out by now. That could be the game changer, the fielding though it has not costed our team much for now.
Not only India SA also missed catches. They missed more that 4 catches of Rohit. Now India won this match and after 3 defeat I think chances of SA reaching in 1st four is very poor.
epraneeth77 wrote:Virat was scratchy in the lead up to the tournament and he has continued his scratchy form for the first match. It won't be long for him to find his form though.
Many around globe are waiting for him to come in his real form. So hope it finds it soon. In yesterday's match I felt the same about Dhoni too.
I felt the match between Australia and West Indies yesterday was the best in this tournament so far. Both the teams have a great chance to secure a place in the top 4. Nathan Coulter-Nile's 92 from just 60 balls came as a surprise. Mitchell Starc was at his best with super fast yorkers. India can expect a good challenge on Sunday from the Aussies.
Yes completely agree with you. Also, West Indies allowed Australia to move on especially after Australia lost 4 quick wickets at the start. West Indies should have applied more pressure in that situation to restrict Australia to a relatively small total somewhere close to 200 or so.
I think West Indian bowlers did the most harm to their chance of winning the game by giving away too many runs as wide. Umpires play a great role too in defeating WI by giving as many as 6 wrong decisions. Gail was out by a NO Ball and even the TV umpire did not notice it. I think if the trend goes on then India will also face the same problem against Australia in their next match.
suni51 wrote:I think West Indian bowlers did the most harm to their chance of winning the game by giving away too many runs as wide. Umpires play a great role too in defeating WI by giving as many as 6 wrong decisions. Gail was out by a NO Ball and even the TV umpire did not notice it. I think if the trend goes on then India will also face the same problem against Australia in their next match.
Actually, the ball before Chris Gayle got out was a big front foot No Ball. The umpires missed it. Had it been called a NO Ball, then it would have been a Free Hit on the next ball on which Gayle was eventually adjudged leg before wicket.
Yes the umpiring throughout the match was not up to the international standards. I felt most of the critical errors were made by the on-field Sri Lankan umpire. In a big tournament like this, such errors are not at all desirable. They can be really disheartening for the players and the fans.
Saurav Banerjee wrote:suni51 wrote:I think West Indian bowlers did the most harm to their chance of winning the game by giving away too many runs as wide. Umpires play a great role too in defeating WI by giving as many as 6 wrong decisions. Gail was out by a NO Ball and even the TV umpire did not notice it. I think if the trend goes on then India will also face the same problem against Australia in their next match.
Actually, the ball before Chris Gayle got out was a big front foot No Ball. The umpires missed it. Had it been called a NO Ball, then it would have been a Free Hit on the next ball on which Gayle was eventually adjudged leg before wicket.
Yes the umpiring throughout the match was not up to the international standards. I felt most of the critical errors were made by the on-field Sri Lankan umpire. In a big tournament like this, such errors are not at all desirable. They can be really disheartening for the players and the fans.
Same, in fact if the previous ball was declared a no ball the ball on Gail got out could have gone for a big six. WI needed 280 and Gail is able to score 180 out of those 280 on his day. What I feel is that WI is always on the wrong end when it comes to wrong decisions.
suni51 wrote:Saurav Banerjee wrote:suni51 wrote:I think West Indian bowlers did the most harm to their chance of winning the game by giving away too many runs as wide. Umpires play a great role too in defeating WI by giving as many as 6 wrong decisions. Gail was out by a NO Ball and even the TV umpire did not notice it. I think if the trend goes on then India will also face the same problem against Australia in their next match.
Actually, the ball before Chris Gayle got out was a big front foot No Ball. The umpires missed it. Had it been called a NO Ball, then it would have been a Free Hit on the next ball on which Gayle was eventually adjudged leg before wicket.
Yes the umpiring throughout the match was not up to the international standards. I felt most of the critical errors were made by the on-field Sri Lankan umpire. In a big tournament like this, such errors are not at all desirable. They can be really disheartening for the players and the fans.
Same, in fact if the previous ball was declared a no ball the ball on Gail got out could have gone for a big six. WI needed 280 and Gail is able to score 180 out of those 280 on his day. What I feel is that WI is always on the wrong end when it comes to wrong decisions.
Yes such type of umpiring is very unfortunate for the game of cricket. In the last Football World Cup we witnessed how the referees favored the big European nations when it came to close decisions. So, these type of unfortunate things are happening in other sports also. What I feel is that officials in charge of the match whether an umpire or a referee hesitate to go against big countries to save their own face. In this case, Australia being the 5 time World Champions and with a powerful media team, umpires feel its safe to give the decisions in their favor when it's a 50-50 scenario.
I have a feeling that England will come hard at Bangladesh in today's match after their surprise defeat against Pakistan. Therefore, expecting Morgan and his men to be back in their winning ways. In the other match to be played today, I don't see Afghanistan making an upset against a team like New Zealand.
Saurav Banerjee wrote:I have a feeling that England will come hard at Bangladesh in today's match after their surprise defeat against Pakistan. Therefore, expecting Morgan and his men to be back in their winning ways. In the other match to be played today, I don't see Afghanistan making an upset against a team like New Zealand.
Ya, I am thinking they will crush them. But as of now they are playing rather moderately. May be they will up the ante after 40 overs.
I believe Australia are the favorites in today's match against India. This is mainly because of their recent form and their convincing victories in the last ODI series played between the two nations on Indian soil itself. Australia came back from being 0-2 down to eventually clinch the series 3-2. To beat India on their home turf and that too without the services of key players like Smith, Warner and Starc, will give Aussies enough confidence going into today's match. However, I am sure India have their own plans to blunt the Aussie threat.
In my views if Australians have an upper hand the only reason is that our openers are in uncertain form. While Rohit hit a good century in previous match Dhavan's form is not in the best of his form lately. He is going through a bad phase which is matter of concern and so is Virat who is not playing his usual self for some time now. Maybe his his confidence level has gone down after IPL thrashing.
Topic Author
Saurav Banerjee
@Saurav Banerjee