An interesting article, who was this minister??

According to the story, that man became later Prime minister of India. This shows that the concerned minister was in Indira Gandhi's cabinet as well.  We have a list of ex prime ministers. It is not difficult to identify. But we cannot take even such story very authentic. The CIA or KJB agent- nobody can be relied.  any way, that minister would have become prime minister of coalition United front  government. He would also have held previously diplomatic assignments- may be as an ambassador.  I will not like to name him. Any one may guess the identity. 

Lot of politicians and government officials at senior levels open up to foreigners very easily as they think themselves above and apart from the locals.

Yes, indeed it's shocking but who the man is! Hope we get to know the name of that man. 

Kalyani I think I know who this person is ? But honestly , one can well believe anything from the grand old party now that all the skeletons with regard to Samjhauta , Malegaon , the Kashmir situation etc etc is tumbling out. They are capable of stooping to any level to stay in power .

Twisting history is acceptable these days to bolster one's beliefs however wrong they may be.

usha manohar wrote:

Kalyani I think I know who this person is ? But honestly , one can well believe anything from the grand old party now that all the skeletons with regard to Samjhauta , Malegaon , the Kashmir situation etc etc is tumbling out. They are capable of stooping to any level to stay in power .

I would really like to know who that person is!

Also, why is it called as 'twisting of history' every time more skeletons fall out from the closet?

The skeletons are planted and made look original. The gullible bhaktas want to hear and naturally fall for it. Name the person @USHA.

Shampa Sadhya wrote:

Yes, indeed it's shocking but who the man is! Hope we get to know the name of that man. 

Like you many of us are curious to know the name of that politician but I doubt if we ll ever get to know it as it would be quite a scandal. I am sure people are already working hard to ensure that it remain a secret.

If you carefully read between the lines it s not difficult to guess who the person is.But like everything else ( bofors etc etc) it will be denied ..

If you carefully read between the lines it s not difficult to guess who the person is.But like everything else ( bofors etc etc) it will be denied ..

Why are you afraid in naming the politician?

Better to name the Politician, instead of giving clues.

Re: An interesting article, who was this minister??

by vijay » 10 hours ago

It is my opinion only which may be right or wrong , so I prefer not to disclose. However you are free to do so..

OK. Because I could not guess about the Minister, I asked you to give an exact clue

rambabu wrote:

OK. Because I could not guess about the Minister, I asked you to give an exact clue

I am least interested in either your opinions or views ..

I am surprised that our members are unable to identify the concerned minister.  He became Prime minister.  He had also held diplomatic assignment as ambassador.  This much suffices to identify.   . 

Do you mean Modi? I don't believe it.I am sure he is Rajiv Gandhi

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

I am surprised that our members are unable to identify the concerned minister.  He became Prime minister.  He had also held diplomatic assignment as ambassador.  This much suffices to identify.   . 

I can very well imagine who is being wrongly identified just to shield the real culprit which has always been the case with the family and the party which has blinkers on!

rambabu wrote:

Do you mean Modi? I don't believe it.I am sure he is Rajiv Gandhi

Modi certainly not. Rajiv Gandhi certainly not. The concerned person is said to be a minister  who later became Prime minister. Neither Modi nor Rajiv Gandhi held any ministerial post in union govt.They became PM straightway.  You have to look for some one who was in the union cabinet at  relevant time and later became PM. 

If you know, why don't you name the Minister? I am curious to know.