Ritual slaughter of animals in India

See at some points where they think that they are on the right thoughts of the people they are putting their thought.

Peta is a fake organization. Now a days, they have been in the Social media glare for their anti Hinduism stand against jallikattu as cruelty towards animals

It is because we have organizations like PETA that cruel practice of Jallikattu was exposed and now have been asked to refrain from using physical abuse to the animals ..Unless there are stricter rules PETA can do little, they can only work within the framework..

One reason I can think of for this question is that sports like jallikattu do not guarantee the death of the bulls immediately. The bulls are injured grievously, their horns broken and they suffer a lot of pain and agony and maybe die a slow death after a long time of suffering and infection in the wounds. Ritual slaughter involves killing the animals instantaneously and is associated with religion which is even more sensitive topic than culture and tradition.

rambabu wrote:

Peta is a fake organization. Now a days, they have been in the Social media glare for their anti Hinduism stand against jallikattu as cruelty towards animals

Yes, this organization goes after soft targets and the Hindu is a soft target as was seen by the invaders from Ghazni, Timur and the Mughals

There are many festivals that allow the animals to die a lingering death and yet nothing is done. No discussion even.!

Kalyani Nandurkar wrote:

One reason I can think of for this question is that sports like jallikattu do not guarantee the death of the bulls immediately. The bulls are injured grievously, their horns broken and they suffer a lot of pain and agony and maybe die a slow death after a long time of suffering and infection in the wounds. Ritual slaughter involves killing the animals instantaneously and is associated with religion which is even more sensitive topic than culture and tradition.

Dhabihah which is the Islamic law that deals with the ritualistic slaughter of animals is nothing but a slow and painful death meted out while the blood drains out slowly. How can any religion except Islam prescribe such inhuman practices? honestly..

usha manohar wrote:

Kalyani Nandurkar wrote:

One reason I can think of for this question is that sports like jallikattu do not guarantee the death of the bulls immediately. The bulls are injured grievously, their horns broken and they suffer a lot of pain and agony and maybe die a slow death after a long time of suffering and infection in the wounds. Ritual slaughter involves killing the animals instantaneously and is associated with religion which is even more sensitive topic than culture and tradition.

Dhabihah which is the Islamic law that deals with the ritualistic slaughter of animals is nothing but a slow and painful death meted out while the blood drains out slowly. How can any religion except Islam prescribe such inhuman practices? honestly..

It is practiced for 1500 years and nobody ( not even USA) have banned it.

A link about PETA, 

https://www.activistfacts.com/organizations/21-people-for-the-ethical-treatment-of-animals/

PETA had been criticized no doubt but there are two sides to a coin and we need to know all before coming to any conclusion..

http://www.peta.org/blog/euthanize/

MG Singh wrote:

rambabu wrote:

Peta is a fake organization. Now a days, they have been in the Social media glare for their anti Hinduism stand against jallikattu as cruelty towards animals

Yes, this organization goes after soft targets and the Hindu is a soft target as was seen by the invaders from Ghazni, Timur and the Mughals

Sir everyone now a day wants to target the weaker one and so do the PETA doing the exact thing.

If this is true then it is the fascinating case of choosing and then targeting. Any organization be it of any kind should always see the parallel perspective and the mentioned articles does show their pick and choose approach. 

Babu saroj wrote:

MG Singh wrote:

rambabu wrote:

Peta is a fake organization. Now a days, they have been in the Social media glare for their anti Hinduism stand against jallikattu as cruelty towards animals

Yes, this organization goes after soft targets and the Hindu is a soft target as was seen by the invaders from Ghazni, Timur and the Mughals

Sir everyone now a day wants to target the weaker one and so do the PETA doing the exact thing.

That is always the case ..PETA has tried to reform Islamic cruelty as well but faced very stiff opposition , so they backed out. They will only try and change things where change is possible .. Hinduism with all its faults is still a very accommodating religion , so they may be focusing here , which will ultimately benefit us !

PETA in question is a fake PETA, which collected millions of Rupees from the animal lovers.

rambabu wrote:

PETA in question is a fake PETA, which collected millions of Rupees from the animal lovers.

That is your opinion ..You make it sound as if you have substantial proof ...

usha manohar wrote:

rambabu wrote:

PETA in question is a fake PETA, which collected millions of Rupees from the animal lovers.

That is your opinion ..You make it sound as if you have substantial proof ...

Please have a look at the Web link provided by MG Singh, who started the post.

rambabu wrote:

usha manohar wrote:

rambabu wrote:

PETA in question is a fake PETA, which collected millions of Rupees from the animal lovers.

That is your opinion ..You make it sound as if you have substantial proof ...

Please have a look at the Web link provided by MG Singh, who started the post.

Since you seem to have read and digested the link please share relevant information ..

usha manohar wrote:

rambabu wrote:

usha manohar wrote:

rambabu wrote:

PETA in question is a fake PETA, which collected millions of Rupees from the animal lovers.

That is your opinion ..You make it sound as if you have substantial proof ...

Please have a look at the Web link provided by MG Singh, who started the post.

Since you seem to have read and digested the link please share relevant information ..

I read it and digested the link. You can see the discussions with MG and other members

rambabu wrote:

usha manohar wrote:

rambabu wrote:

usha manohar wrote:

rambabu wrote:

PETA in question is a fake PETA, which collected millions of Rupees from the animal lovers.

That is your opinion ..You make it sound as if you have substantial proof ...

Please have a look at the Web link provided by MG Singh, who started the post.

Since you seem to have read and digested the link please share relevant information ..

I read it and digested the link. You can see the discussions with MG and other members

I already have , also read few more links and articles other than the ones provided by MG  so that I get perspectives from both sides ..

Talking of Jalikattu think of what is happening around the word. IN Colombia and Spain the constitutional court has struck down the ban on bullfighting. So bull fighting won't go away. I wonder what is the objection to Jalikattu when we can allow Kurbani.