No freedom of expression for IAS

Freedom of speech as a fundamental right is not absolute for any citizen and it is all the more circumscribed in the case of civil servants.Talking about neutrality of them our common experience has been that exceptional trait is displayed by a few honorable of them!!

suni51 wrote:

No, IAS or any other responsible government servant cannot express his views officially but he can certainly have a personal account as a common citizen and express normally. This rule is applicable for all government employees or at least should be applicable.Armed forces have already been banned for having an account on FB.

Social sites are also source making contacts. Here in area some defense personal changed for spying. Pakistani's used social site to contact with them. It is also one reason to banned having FB account for armed forces.

anil wrote:

suni51 wrote:

No, IAS or any other responsible government servant cannot express his views officially but he can certainly have a personal account as a common citizen and express normally. This rule is applicable for all government employees or at least should be applicable.Armed forces have already been banned for having an account on FB.

Social sites are also source making contacts. Here in area some defense personal changed for spying. Pakistani's used social site to contact with them. It is also one reason to banned having FB account for armed forces.

Yes in view of the security of the country and the possibilities of leakage of vital information, Armed forces are not permitted to have an account in  any Social Web site. This applies to all Civil servants.

 

anil wrote:

suni51 wrote:

No, IAS or any other responsible government servant cannot express his views officially but he can certainly have a personal account as a common citizen and express normally. This rule is applicable for all government employees or at least should be applicable.Armed forces have already been banned for having an account on FB.

Social sites are also source making contacts. Here in area some defense personal changed for spying. Pakistani's used social site to contact with them. It is also one reason to banned having FB account for armed forces.

 True Anil...lately there are many reported cases of ISIS handlers and recruiters who have influenced a number of young men to join ISIS. Another pertinent point is that expressing oneself over a social networking site such as FB is still not really professional or can even be claimed as a fundamental right. Such sites are mainly used for business or leisure purposes and should be treated as such. It is usually seen that people go overboard when expressing their opinions about religious or political issues, or posting about their own personal whereabouts, where they are, who they are with or what they doing etc. etc. on a digital platform. Such information, especially when coming from military personnel or government officials can be taken advantage of. So there should indeed be restrictions on people serving in specific roles.

I remember a time in the recent past when a few friends would post hate speech and videos through my time life on Facebook..Of course I deleted them from my friend list and also changed my privacy settings. When there is hatred and an intention to create hatred among others some people go all out without any ethics or shame !

Government employees cannot be openly seen as having views opposite to that of the government as it would lead to conflict of interest and cause bias in their working.

vijay wrote:

Government employees cannot be openly seen as having views opposite to that of the government as it would lead to conflict of interest and cause bias in their working.

then where goes the freedom of expression of every citizen of India, if the government workers cannot speaks their words in public which they want to say.

Babu saroj wrote:

vijay wrote:

Government employees cannot be openly seen as having views opposite to that of the government as it would lead to conflict of interest and cause bias in their working.

then where goes the freedom of expression of every citizen of India, if the government workers cannot speaks their words in public which they want to say.

 

A government employee is an important part of the administrative mechanism. He is supposed to be politically neutral and perform his job in accordance with law and departmental rules/ instructions. He is not supposed to express any political preferences- likes or dislikes. A govt. employee cannot even frequently attend public meetings of a particular party. The only right that a govt. employee can exercise is right of vote. But even then he must not indicate to others how he voted.  

This is what is contained in conduct rules.  As long as one is in govt. service, it is necessary to observe political neutrality for sake of smooth governance.  

 

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

Babu saroj wrote:

vijay wrote:

Government employees cannot be openly seen as having views opposite to that of the government as it would lead to conflict of interest and cause bias in their working.

then where goes the freedom of expression of every citizen of India, if the government workers cannot speaks their words in public which they want to say.

 

A government employee is an important part of the administrative mechanism. He is supposed to be politically neutral and perform his job in accordance with law and departmental rules/ instructions. He is not supposed to express any political preferences- likes or dislikes. A govt. employee cannot even frequently attend public meetings of a particular party. The only right that a govt. employee can exercise is right of vote. But even then he must not indicate to others how he voted.  

This is what is contained in conduct rules.  As long as one is in govt. service, it is necessary to observe political neutrality for sake of smooth governance.

freedom is not just  a right but responsibilities too.                                                                                                         

 

 

that means when we get government jobs, we should become reserved.

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

Babu saroj wrote:

vijay wrote:

Government employees cannot be openly seen as having views opposite to that of the government as it would lead to conflict of interest and cause bias in their working.

then where goes the freedom of expression of every citizen of India, if the government workers cannot speaks their words in public which they want to say.

 

A government employee is an important part of the administrative mechanism. He is supposed to be politically neutral and perform his job in accordance with law and departmental rules/ instructions. He is not supposed to express any political preferences- likes or dislikes. A govt. employee cannot even frequently attend public meetings of a particular party. The only right that a govt. employee can exercise is right of vote. But even then he must not indicate to others how he voted.  

This is what is contained in conduct rules.  As long as one is in govt. service, it is necessary to observe political neutrality for sake of smooth governance.

You are right sir but how many employees are following code of conduct. Here in my city collector said to some persons, What congress give you, Madam, (CM of Rajasthan) Completed sugar mill with in 12 months. These are words of DC. 

 

 

anil wrote:

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

Babu saroj wrote:

vijay wrote:

Government employees cannot be openly seen as having views opposite to that of the government as it would lead to conflict of interest and cause bias in their working.

then where goes the freedom of expression of every citizen of India, if the government workers cannot speaks their words in public which they want to say.

 

A government employee is an important part of the administrative mechanism. He is supposed to be politically neutral and perform his job in accordance with law and departmental rules/ instructions. He is not supposed to express any political preferences- likes or dislikes. A govt. employee cannot even frequently attend public meetings of a particular party. The only right that a govt. employee can exercise is right of vote. But even then he must not indicate to others how he voted.  

This is what is contained in conduct rules.  As long as one is in govt. service, it is necessary to observe political neutrality for sake of smooth governance.

You are right sir but how many employees are following code of conduct. Here in my city collector said to some persons, What congress give you, Madam, (CM of Rajasthan) Completed sugar mill with in 12 months. These are words of DC. 

Unfortunately, state govt. employees are being misused by ruling parties.  The employees quickly switch their loyalty on change of ruling party. In U.P. also, police and other state govt. employees are used by the ruling party for partisan ends.  But the moment some other party comes to power, the employees will switch their loyalty. For this, politicians are to blame more. Employees are just poor fish. 

 

 

 

Survival of the loyalist.

vijay wrote:

Survival of the loyalist.

Agreed. Only way to survive and succeed is to change according to circumstances. Politicians and bureaucrats both survive thus only. 

Now Rambabu is also changing somewhat

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

vijay wrote:

Survival of the loyalist.

Agreed. Only way to survive and succeed is to change according to circumstances. Politicians and bureaucrats both survive thus only. 

sir we need and we should change accordingly because if we not then the consequences will become very much evil for us to survive in this world for a minute also..