Single party democracy

If this happen in India then i think India will be a more secure political country

India never have single party democracy. Congress mukt Bhart in impossible. In earlier days of independence congress is major party and oppoisiong like Jan Sangh, communist and sociallist are few but they were much active and effective. Remember Ram Manohar Lohia, Zorg Farnadise.

That's why there were no disclose of conspiracy done in india that time inside the party 

Babu saroj wrote:

That's why there were no disclose of conspiracy done in india that time inside the party 

About which party you are talking write in detail please!

anil wrote:

Babu saroj wrote:

That's why there were no disclose of conspiracy done in india that time inside the party 

About which party you are talking write in detail please!

Congress and i think it is not so important to say you what happened in the past 

 

Babu saroj wrote:

anil wrote:

Babu saroj wrote:

That's why there were no disclose of conspiracy done in india that time inside the party 

About which party you are talking write in detail please!

Congress and i think it is not so important to say you what happened in the past 

congress leaders in past were not like present. They gave respect to  opposition. They are genious and Nobel person. Sardar Patel, Molana Azad, Shastri Ji and many more.

 

 

anil wrote:

India never have single party democracy. Congress mukt Bhart in impossible. In earlier days of independence congress is major party and oppoisiong like Jan Sangh, communist and sociallist are few but they were much active and effective. Remember Ram Manohar Lohia, Zorg Farnadise.

Although there was a name here and there in other parties for all practical purpose from Independence until 1977 India was more or less not just single party but single family owned democracy. Janata Party came into power and after that other parties became more prominent. ..

That Congress has become a single Family ruled Democracy is undeniable. Surprisingly, still Congress is trying to  bring back that undesirable Family ruled tradition. Thanks to Modi for destroying that tradition.

Now with most parties being edged out by the Election commission since none of them have the required number of seats in the lok Sabha .  According to the criteria set by the poll panel, a 'national party' needs to get at least 6% votes each from minimum four states, or get 2% of total seats in the Lok Sabha from at least three states, or it should be a recognised as a state party in at least four states.

NCP, BSP and CPI no longer fulfil any of the above conditions. The three parties had time till June 27 to contest EC's move and seek a hearing. If they are derecognised, then BJP, Congress and CPI(M) will be the only political parties that will continue to enjoy the national tag. Under the Symbols Order 1968, a party, on losing the national status, does not have the right to fight elections using a common symbol across the country.

In other words, if the decision is implemented, the analogue clock symbol will not be reserved for all NCP candidates across the country. It can use it only in states where it is recognized as a state party.

This is equivalent to losing the national character of the party. Also, NCP, BSP and CPI could lose facilities like utilising All India Radio and Doordarshan for poll-eve broadcasts and free copies of electoral rolls, which they enjoyed as national parties

For a country of India's size it is essential that it have multi party system of democracy.  Vietnam, Cuba are Communist countries which do not allow any other party to exist and their elections are sham elections. Whether BJP or Congress there should be at least these two and more at te national level. But it seems we are heading to strong regional parties at the States and a coalition of them would be at the center. Not a healthy trend.

What BJP says about Congress free India should not lead to single party but perhaps if such downfall of the oldest party of India continues then perhaps we are moving towards a day when there should be a single national party against all regional parties. 

Then vote Congress for a change.

usha manohar wrote:

anil wrote:

India never have single party democracy. Congress mukt Bhart in impossible. In earlier days of independence congress is major party and oppoisiong like Jan Sangh, communist and sociallist are few but they were much active and effective. Remember Ram Manohar Lohia, Zorg Farnadise.

 

Although there was a name here and there in other parties for all practical purpose from Independence until 1977 India was more or less not just single party but single family owned democracy. Janata Party came into power and after that other parties became more prominent. 

Yes it is right that until 1977 Indian democracy was one family owned. The reason behind it is that politician of that time was not much greedy of power like present time. They wer freedom fighters and persons of principals. They never challenged Nehru family.

 

Of course soon after we got freedom, patriotism and nationalism would be running high among the population , also among the leaders who fought the British . But once the country is free and they came to know it is for keeps they became greedy for power and whatever else they could out of their position...

mohan manohar wrote:

What BJP says about Congress free India should not lead to single party but perhaps if such downfall of the oldest party of India continues then perhaps we are moving towards a day when there should be a single national party against all regional parties. 

At present status of congress is like a regional party. Overall this situation is not in best interest of country.If ruling party have not mozorrity in upper house how he will work.

usha manohar wrote:

Of course soon after we got freedom, patriotism and nationalism would be running high among the population , also among the leaders who fought the British . But once the country is free and they came to know it is for keeps they became greedy for power and whatever else they could out of their position...

Till the period of Shastri Ji politicians were not so greedy, Situation was change when Indira Gandhi was PM.

usha manohar wrote:

Of course soon after we got freedom, patriotism and nationalism would be running high among the population , also among the leaders who fought the British . But once the country is free and they came to know it is for keeps they became greedy for power and whatever else they could out of their position...

now a day we can see patriotism only in india pakistan cricket matches other than that nobody can see any patriotism anywhere in India 

anil wrote:

usha manohar wrote:

Of course soon after we got freedom, patriotism and nationalism would be running high among the population , also among the leaders who fought the British . But once the country is free and they came to know it is for keeps they became greedy for power and whatever else they could out of their position...

Till the period of Shastri Ji politicians were not so greedy, Situation was change when Indira Gandhi was PM.

Those days are no more now, where you can see a politician without greed. may be some exceptions are there. The root cause for this malice is Congress. Every child in India Knows about it.

 

Congress represented a large section of society. So singularly blaming it and absolving others is not proper.

rambabu wrote:

anil wrote:

usha manohar wrote:

Of course soon after we got freedom, patriotism and nationalism would be running high among the population , also among the leaders who fought the British . But once the country is free and they came to know it is for keeps they became greedy for power and whatever else they could out of their position...

Till the period of Shastri Ji politicians were not so greedy, Situation was change when Indira Gandhi was PM.

Those days are no more now, where you can see a politician without greed. may be some exceptions are there. The root cause for this malice is Congress. Every child in India Knows about it.

After freedom most of time congress was ruling party. Many politicians change their party from congress to others.