Would you like to read and see this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXOx6x9D2_c
It is time Kher came out and admitted his political affiliations so that his view points are seen in proper perspective rather than sponsored or provocative outbursts (depending on one's leanings). That he was removed from the Chairmanship of Censor Board by Congress in 2004 could be a reason for his hatred for Rahul and his party. Genuine grevience from Kher's side.
Here we can here the speech of the veteran Bollywood actor Anupam Kher's speech about intolerance. He didn't forget to give a direct hit to the Congress party through his speech. He told that Congress is the most tolerant in India because they are tolerating a person whom they want to project as a Prime Minister of this country.
vijay wrote:It is time Kher came out and admitted his political affiliations so that his view points are seen in proper perspective rather than sponsored or provocative outbursts (depending on one's leanings). That he was removed from the Chairmanship of Censor Board by Congress in 2004 could be a reason for his hatred for Rahul and his party. Genuine grevience from Kher's side.
I agree, it's time everyone came out and tell which side they are and whom they support. I am at one side only- India
Anupam Kher has always been a very sane and sensible person, often even criticising BJP when its members behaved in an anti social manner ! I also admire Kiran his wife for her forthright speech and clarity of thoughts ! When people like him speak the truth it becomes very difficult for some to admit that he is totally right and especially about Rahul Gandhi , who has absolutely no stature or qualification of any sort to lead his own party , leave alone the nation !
The issue of intolerance was discussed in the event. It is obvious that every speaker would have in mind his political affiliations- likes and dislikes. In this context, we need see the participation by Anupam Kher and others. I just went through brilliant speech of Barkha Dutt. Her speech is indeed factual and more sincere.
On tolerance, I got a very good quote- We must be intolerant of intolerance.
@Gulshanji
I would like you to go through your post especially the one which compelled me to raise the issue of fascism among members in the forum and ask yourself if that exactly conveyed any such import. I repeat you said it which you now say that you did not mean it. And it is your problem not mine. I am delighted that you have an able comrade in Vijay to aid and abet in all what you are out there to do.Long live your bondship! He is so spritually tied to you that he can even gauge your feelings and even emote for you!
Finally let me say very clearly that I look at issues only and haven't mortgaged my soul to none to arrive at conclusion in my own method.
chinmoymukherjee wrote:@Gulshanji
I would like you to go through your post especially the one which compelled me to raise the issue of fascism among members in the forum and ask yourself if that exactly conveyed any such import. I repeat you said it which you now say that you did not mean it. And it is your problem not mine. I am delighted that you have an able comrade in Vijay to aid and abet in all what you are out there to do.Long live your bondship! He is so spritually tied to you that he can even gauge your feelings and even emote for you!
Finally let me say very clearly that I look at issues only and haven't mortgaged my soul to none to arrive at conclusion in my own method.
Chinmoy, I have no words to express in proper words about your straightforward responses. There is a duo here who complement each others views.
rambabu wrote:chinmoymukherjee wrote:@Gulshanji
I would like you to go through your post especially the one which compelled me to raise the issue of fascism among members in the forum and ask yourself if that exactly conveyed any such import. I repeat you said it which you now say that you did not mean it. And it is your problem not mine. I am delighted that you have an able comrade in Vijay to aid and abet in all what you are out there to do.Long live your bondship! He is so spritually tied to you that he can even gauge your feelings and even emote for you!
Finally let me say very clearly that I look at issues only and haven't mortgaged my soul to none to arrive at conclusion in my own method.
Chinmoy, I have no words to express in proper words about your straightforward responses. There is a duo here who complement each others views.
IN fact, the senior member's intolerance and dismissive attitude towards Hindu history and Indian culture has only grown into leaps and bounds after the arrival of the spiritual brother! earlier too., he had freely expressed his opinions, but it is only now he has started accusing us all as being Fascists because we are Hindus and we want our country to reclaim its lost identity!
When UM supports or gets support from KN it is alright. When CM drops in with his support that is great. When RB supports his new found globe trotter that is fantastic. When MG returns the support it is patriotic. But when V supports GA all hell breaks loose.Choicest abuses in eloquent to crude english are thrown in. Goes to show the hollowness of arguments that a mere support gesture creates an earthquake in your territories. Be that as it may, the truth is not going to change.
Let us not exaggerate things out of proportion..certain amount of arguments and counter arguments are always there when individuals have different political preferences and affiliations ! Support also is based on ones own beliefs and leanings and it is understood as and when it happens..
Discussions usually become a bit biased and contain little accusation but that's not intentional. It occurs only because one wants to prove his/her point as the perfect one. Yes, I do agree we need not become personal but it happens at some or the other time just because of disagreement in opinion and nothing else. So, it should not be given any importance and must be accepted very casually.
Read the reaction of the leader whom Anupam Kher verbally attacked in a debate. Link:
usha manohar wrote:Let us not exaggerate things out of proportion..certain amount of arguments and counter arguments are always there when individuals have different political preferences and affiliations ! Support also is based on ones own beliefs and leanings and it is understood as and when it happens..
Your points are well taken but what happens when supporter is attacked for supporting a viewpoint not to their liking. I have never degraded anyone for supporting another person's views. I attack the view not the one who submits it. Please say a line for them also to balance your observations.
@suni51