Pork banned in 56 countried

2.2K Views
0 Replies
1 min read

Banning beef in India has become a contentious isue and many people are shouting that many communitiues in India eat beef. Spare a thought and think that 56 nations in the world have banned pork. They alsio have many pork eaters like Coptic Christians, never the less pork is banned.

2 Likes

14 Replies

Secularism means freedom to worship ones religion. It is nota license to eat beef. India is a predominent Hindu country and beef should be banned.

Incidentally Pakistan also gives protection to minorities. It is in the Pak constitution, but Pork is banned.

MG Singh wrote:

Secularism means freedom to worship ones religion. It is nota license to eat beef. India is a predominent Hindu country and beef should be banned.

Incidentally Pakistan also gives protection to minorities. It is in the Pak constitution, but Pork is banned.

beef, cow, meat, cow killing, cow slaughter, slaughter cow, meat ban, killing cows, beef legal states india, beef illegal states india, beef ban, beef ban issue, beef ban controversy, Hindu, beef ban India, bjp beef ban, india news, nation news

Except the states marked in Blue, Cow slaughter is banned in the entire Bharat. You can understand why Cow slaughter should be banned in India.

Rambabu@. Thank you for the map. It is quite illuminating. I have no doubt in my mind that cow slaughter must be banned in India. I wonder why the hugh and cry. ? The coptic christians in Muslim countries do not raise their voice against ban on pork, though they love to eat pork.

You are welcome . I wanted to depict the necessity of banning of cow slaughter in a most simple, yet convincing without  many words. And , you too helped me by using the word "Predominantly" about Hindus in your previous response.

 

rambabu wrote:

I know, Ban on pork create heated arguments .  These heated arguments are  mainly from those political parties which are interested in appeasing those minorities to strengthen their Vote Banks. As you said those remain as shouts only.

I think India is not country who banned pork, here it is not possible.

 

 

Banning appeases the majority, not banning appeases the minority. What logic!!

vijay wrote:

Banning appeases the majority, not banning appeases the minority. What logic!!

Logic ?? That's the word, you cannot find in the lexicon of a politician.

 

Whether people lke it or not, it cannot be denied that India is a HIndu majority ntion. The will of the majority will and always  remain paramount. It is so in UK and other nations also. The minority cannot be expected to rule. Hence beef ban is justified.

I'm in total agreement with you. This a country where Hindus are in Majority.  Ban on beef is very much necessary,.

 

What percent of Hindus support beef ban. It is some upper castes who want it but vast majority does not want it. After all the suppliers of animals to the slaughter houses were their owners for economical reasons. Those who have nothing to do with cows are championing the cause of beef ban. 

rambabu wrote:

Of course, eating the meat of healthy animal  is essential. Even  meat of  an unhealthy goat  will cause harmful diseases. Above all Pigs are not linked with any religion. If these conditions are satisfied a Pork eater can go ahead and relish the taste of the pork.

There is no doubt that eating meat is good for health. But over eating of red meat is not good. Research found that over use of red meat is one of the reasons for some kinds of cancer. Don't try to cook the meat if it is not fresh. 

 

Topic Author

Topic Stats

Created Monday, 25 January 2016 02:38
Last Updated Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies 0
Views 2.2K
Likes 2

Category

Discussions

433 Topics

Share This Topic