Salman Khan released in hit and run case

2.6K Views
0 Replies
1 min read

Salman Khan release by High court in hit and run case. Now it is question who were killed to innocent sleeping of the Foot Path. What we say to it, failure of judicial system of investigation agency. Is it justice with infested?

20 Replies

Salman Khan is not guilty. The decision of the trial court is aside . On the basis of evidence, produced by the prosecution Salman cannot convicted. This ia as per the Judge.

 

I don't know much about the case, but i think Salman khan was not driving the car, when this all happened. His driver was driving the car. So, he was pulled in this case unnecessarily. 

Please correct me if i am wrong. 

Salman Khan release by High court in hit and run case. Now it is question who were killed to innocent sleeping of the Foot Path. What we say to it, failure of judicial system of investigation agency. Is it justice with infested?

 

There is absolutely no doubt in anyones mind who read and watched news during the time of accident that Salman Khan is the guilty party, he rammed into those people driving while he was drunk and returning from a party, with his cousin Kamal Khan and a body guard/driver Patel sitting next to him and then ran away from the scene.The only flaw is the shoddy investigation done by the Police.In fact I remember Kamal Khan admitting that salman was driving the car and that he himself was sitting in the back seat, ut later retreated his statement under pressure...Salman is guilty and if there is justice in nature he will have to pay for his wrong deeds at some stage or the other

Whether Salman khan was driving car or not, i don't know, but i really think that he would have helped the families who suffered from this accident. By giving some money or any other sort of help he would have done to him. Salman khan has enough money, where even if he keeps on donating every day, he won't get bankrupt. 

He is one in bollywood, who is a good philantrophist. He keeps on helping and donating. Though donation would be to save taxes or whatever reason, but he does that.

 

The Lawyers divided over HC court decision over the issue of Salman's acquittal.Salman's council Amit Desai said despite investigation, by the investigating officer, the statement of  Salman's driver was not recorded.

Overall observation is that that the prosecution failed to prove the charges leveled against Salman.

 There are other aspects too that was taken into consideration by the HC that lead to Salman's acquittal.

For a more detailed news please refer this link

http://www.firstpost.com/india/salman-khans-bail-justified-or-unusual-lawyers-divided-over-bombay-hc-decision-2235158.html

 

we cannot deny the fact that he is proved innocent by the high court and we as the citizen of India should respect the judgment of the court. I think that he is innocent just because he is very popular in the country he has been targeted. 

The Salman's Hit & Run case stretched too long that facts and evident in the case are easily changed. One of the witness Mr. Ravinder Patil was died who was the bodyguard of Salman. Still the question remained that who killed those person who died on the road.

The Bombay HC said, the prosecution failed to produce enough evidence to prove that Salman was driving the car at the time of accident.The HC took many other aspects into consideration before acquitting Salman. You can have a look at the article link given in the previous postings of my thread.

rambabu wrote:

The Bombay HC said, the prosecution failed to produce enough evidence to prove that Salman was driving the car at the time of accident.The HC took many other aspects into consideration before acquitting Salman. You can have a look at the article link given in the previous postings of my thread.

The doubtful part of this case was the different speed at which the case run. When session court gave judgement and a punishment of 5 year jail was announced, on the same day within  a few hours bail against session court decision was brought. And then it took 13 years to prove that Salman was not driving the car. That's really strange.

 

Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:
rambabu wrote:

The Bombay HC said, the prosecution failed to produce enough evidence to prove that Salman was driving the car at the time of accident.The HC took many other aspects into consideration before acquitting Salman. You can have a look at the article link given in the previous postings of my thread.

The doubtful part of this case was the different speed at which the case run. When session court gave judgement and a punishment of 5 year jail was announced, on the same day within  a few hours bail against session court decision was brought. And then it took 13 years to prove that Salman was not driving the car. That's really strange.

All these speak a lot about our defective Judiciary. Some of its verdicts in the past too make the people wonder whether Indian Judicial system needs a thorough overhauling. This is how a commoner is losing faith on the Judiciary system. And the law offenders are cleverly utilizing the lapses in our Law and the Judicial system

 

 

There are many loop holes in our Judiciary system and need to be reviewed thoroughly. It seems there are different laws for poor and rich. A poor man has less money, so he reaches only to session court and his case ends at session court only. While a rich person even found guilty by session court, can go to High court and then supreme court. And this will take many years for the right decision to come.   

usha manohar wrote:

Apparently Salman Khan and Salim have spent 25 crores of rupees " To Prove Him Innocent " , which goes to show how our judiciary works ! I doubt if an ordinary person even if he is innocent needs to spend that kind of money to prove he is innocent and that our courts that expensive, so where did the 25 crores go?

http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/salim-khan-on-salman-walking-away-what-about-tension-rs-20-cr-spent-1253888

 

Our Judicial system is needed to be reviewed. People start loosing faith on our judicial system.

Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:

There are many loop holes in our Judiciary system and need to be reviewed thoroughly. It seems there are different laws for poor and rich. A poor man has less money, so he reaches only to session court and his case ends at session court only. While a rich person even found guilty by session court, can go to High court and then supreme court. And this will take many years for the right decision to come.   

Generally when a criminal sentence is handed over to a person, he goes to jail. It's only after going to Jail, the criminal will apply for bail. Salman  got his bail within a few hours after receiving his sentence. A Bench at the high court heard the case and immediately Salman has been given Bail. Such cases create doubts in the Public. That's why the common man lost faith in the Judiciary system. Yes, such instances happened earlier too. No doubt Indian judiciary needs a thorough overhauling.

 

With the case of Salmaan Khan, our judicial system has put a question mark upon its own integrity on the points of the granting bail within few hours after conviction and disposal of the appeal by turning down the observation of the Sessions Court on the points which could well be taken into account by the lower court. Prima Facie, the matter seems to be doubtful. Hope the Apex Court will come forward to deliver the justice to the deceased's family.

 

Rightly pointed out that the verdict to acquit Salman has cast the doubts on the Judiciary system of India. As a Lawyer (I hope I'm right) You know better
Ronark Bhardwaj wrote:

Whether Salman khan was driving car or not, i don't know, but i really think that he would have helped the families who suffered from this accident. By giving some money or any other sort of help he would have done to him. Salman khan has enough money, where even if he keeps on donating every day, he won't get bankrupt. 

He is one in bollywood, who is a good philantrophist. He keeps on helping and donating. Though donation would be to save taxes or whatever reason, but he does that.

 

He may have loads of money and he may even have offered to help the families of the victims, which no one knows if he has done or not. However, offering money for killing someone is not justice and will not help the families of the dead. It will not bring them back to life. So calling Salman  a good person, a good philanthropist etc. etc. is not at all right for he is one priceless **&^&% and he deserves to be thrown to wild dogs!

It is only truth that one people died and four injured by car which was of Salman Khan and and that time Salman Khan was also in the car. Driver of Salman Khan gave statement is this case after 12 years. He come in the picture only to save Salman. It is clear that all thing are manipulated. It is the question, the victim was justice.

usha manohar wrote:

Apparently Salman Khan and Salim have spent 25 crores of rupees " To Prove Him Innocent " , which goes to show how our judiciary works ! I doubt if an ordinary person even if he is innocent needs to spend that kind of money to prove he is innocent and that our courts that expensive, so where did the 25 crores go?

http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/salim-khan-on-salman-walking-away-what-about-tension-rs-20-cr-spent-1253888

No need to say where these 25 corees go. Every one know. I think we all did not forgot Jasika lal murder case. It is proved that justice for ordinary peoples is not possible.

 

 

anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:

Apparently Salman Khan and Salim have spent 25 crores of rupees " To Prove Him Innocent " , which goes to show how our judiciary works ! I doubt if an ordinary person even if he is innocent needs to spend that kind of money to prove he is innocent and that our courts that expensive, so where did the 25 crores go?

http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/salim-khan-on-salman-walking-away-what-about-tension-rs-20-cr-spent-1253888

No need to say where these 25 corees go. Every one know. I think we all did not forgot Jasika lal murder case. It is proved that justice for ordinary peoples is not possible.

Justice is a commodity that can be purchased from the Market. Only thing is you should have enough money to buy it. That's why Justice is not for the poor, but to stinking rich.

 

 

 

Topic Author

A

anil

@anil02

Topic Stats

Created Friday, 11 December 2015 16:05
Last Updated Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies 0
Views 2.6K
Likes 0

Share This Topic