The Taj is safe.

That's great. That's show how tuff it was made in compare of current constructions.

These heritage constructions stood the test of time and stood undisturbed for centuries.

Cannot say anything, as in front of natural calamity such size of Nepal and today itself another earthquake occurs could not guarantee anything substantial concrete structure could ever be made of. 

True.. Just now another earth quake.. Nature is getting uncertain so anything can happen.

The intensity indicates its a major earth quake. By evening the amount of damages will be known. Yes anything can happen.

Yes we will able to know about damage lately just like last time. Hope this time not that much damage done.

NAture does not distinguish between the ordinary and the extraordinary, it simply does it job. But the fact is that architecture of all such old buildings including Taj are excellent examples of durability and strength and hence remain untouched mostly through centuries.

True Kalyani. Structures of heritage sites stood the test of time for centuries. But, now it has to be seen the Taj can stand the fury of the present quake which is more powerful than the previous one.

Yes that's why they still there and solid. They have seen such disaster many time but they are good so far. And hope they will be like this for longggggg.

No one can say until the ASI conducts another survey after the present earth quake is over.

But nothing is safe. They tell in news that all north India may have to suffer greater earthquake in future.

This is about the safety of the Taj which survived the earlier earth quake in Nepal. You are talking about earth quake prone regions in India especially Himalayan regions, Delhi, Kashmir etc. however, most of the Southern states are not earth quake prone regions, though they may experience the tremors.

rambabu wrote:

This is about the safety of the Taj which survived the earlier earth quake in Nepal. You are talking about earth quake prone regions in India especially Himalayan regions, Delhi, Kashmir etc. however, most of the Southern states are not earth quake prone regions, though they may experience the tremors.

 

Yes I am talking about northern region which is earthquake prone and Taj too comes in north India.

 I knowtthat  Agra comes in to northern region. The vital point of the thread is after the first quake in Nepal ASI has conducted a survey and the heritage site the Taj was not effected by earlier earth quake of Nepal. How you can say because the Taj is innorthern India Taj also is in danger without conducting a survey for second time by the ASI?

rambabu wrote:

The intensity indicates its a major earth quake. By evening the amount of damages will be known. Yes anything can happen. 

 

Which damages you are talking about? Is it related to Taj?

It's self explanatory. It was a response to a thread which raised a doubt about the number of deaths in the second earh quake of Nepal.

rambabu wrote:

It's self explanatory. It was a response to a thread which raised a doubt about the number of deaths in the second earh quake of Nepal.

 

Death?? No where in the link it is mentioned. It just talks about monuments.

Sanjeev Gupta wrote:

rambabu wrote:

It's self explanatory. It was a response to a thread which raised a doubt about the number of deaths in the second earh quake of Nepal.

 

Death?? No where in the link it is mentioned. It just talks about monuments.

Please have look at the earlier threads of the discussion.

 

rambabu wrote:

Sanjeev Gupta wrote:

rambabu wrote:

It's self explanatory. It was a response to a thread which raised a doubt about the number of deaths in the second earh quake of Nepal.

 

Death?? No where in the link it is mentioned. It just talks about monuments.

Please have look at the earlier threads of the discussion. But the thread is about damage of monuments from the recent earthquakes so we must discuss it here.

 

 

Sanjeev Gupta wrote:

rambabu wrote:

Sanjeev Gupta wrote:

rambabu wrote:

It's self explanatory. It was a response to a thread which raised a doubt about the number of deaths in the second earh quake of Nepal.

 

Death?? No where in the link it is mentioned. It just talks about monuments.

Please have look at the earlier threads of the discussion. But the thread is about damage of monuments from the recent earthquakes so we must discuss it here.

Then discuss, who's stopping you ?