Union minister spots a hidden cam in the trial room of a of Fanindia.
http://www.rediff.com/news/report/smriti-irani-spots-camera-hidden-in-changing-room/20150403.htm
Union minister spots a hidden cam in the trial room of a of Fanindia.
http://www.rediff.com/news/report/smriti-irani-spots-camera-hidden-in-changing-room/20150403.htm
suni51 wrote:Taken into custody and then released on bail. It's not the first time a camera has been found in trial rooms, bathrooms of girls' hostel, hotels and other public places but I have never heard anyone punished so far.
That's why such things keep repeating. We need some solid action otherwise no meaning of custody and all that.
The version of the establishment is that they have camera just for security. Now there is no privacy anywhere. you are watched wherever you go. The ATMs, shops everywhere there are cameras. But here the only issue is that these are in changing rooms So while changing, a customer should be careful enough to change without exposing more. Just as we change clothes while in open space before bathing in river, we should do in changing rooms as well.
rambabu wrote:Saying cams were placed in the changing room for security sounds vague. No one buys it.
Now you may criticize the establishment for camera. But if some terrorists had entered the changing room with some mischievous intention, there would be criticism for not placing camera there. People just get emotional and criticize anything without considering all relevant situations.
rambabu wrote:Sir, terrorists never go to a changing room for the obvious reasons getting caught by the cam clearly. Fixing cams outside especially at the entrance is advisable and it was mandatory .
Terrorists will never ask us about their strategy. Not only terrorism but for other crimes also like petty theft, the cameras are installed. If some crime occurs, people say why camera was not installed. If one is installed, they say why this is installed as privacy is affected. Privacy and security are two objects contradicting each other and you need draw a balance. If you need full security, you will have no privacy. If you need full privacy, security is gone.
rambabu wrote:Does it mean,security robs away our privacy? Then one has to fix secret cams even in our own bedrooms.
Yes. This is a fact. If you install secret camera in your bed room, any thief or criminal entering there for robbing, stealing or raping will be apprehended. But nobody will do so for sake of privacy. either you may have security or privacy. That is why we make some compromise. we have neither full security nor full privacy. full privacy means no security. Full security means no privacy. You can't have both in full.
@rambabu