India just won against Bangladesh and enter in to Top 4 semi finals in current world cup.
India is already good in batting part but this time they are doing really fine job with bowling as well. Its really surprising.
They got 70 wickets in 7 matches, means they have all out all the team. Good job.
What you say?
AKP wrote:rambabu wrote:It's a game of uncertainties . I'm expecting some upsets in thefinal.
What do you mean by upset!? Probably you are telling about NZ win.
But they are strong team in this world cup. Equally strong as Aussi. So it can't be mentioned as upset if that happens.
A team which remained unbeaten up to semis getting defeated badly is not an upset? Is there any guarantee, this kind of upset may not take place in the final ?
rambabu wrote:Even home ground advantage also may not be there if Aussies play badly. Did India won all the matches that were played in India? Which is why cricket pundits describe cricket is a game of uncertainties .
Hmm.. I was just talking about one advantage.
Yes in the end it is all about luck(that matters too) and play of the players of the teams. Hope we will able to see a good match.
As usual the bookies predicted correctly. Their rate was three times your wager if India won and one point something if Australia won ,meaning that Australia was surely going to win. But credit to Indian team for winning seven matches in a row to reach the semi finals.It was not good captaincy to give last over to Mohit who was playing his first series. Also Dhawan and Kohli got out to poor shots, which shows temperamentally the coach is not able to grill in seriousness in them.
rambabu wrote:AKP wrote:Well, that's goes for interest. You may have madness on some other thing.
@Rambabu.. Correct.. Pasand apni apni
But people refuse to see their own madness. But point out at others' madness. A one sided view.
Certainly not, this cannot be one-sided, because Cricket is not the only game, because of so much importance, other games are suffering a huge loss. Why only cricketers get to have the cake and eat it too. They get name, fame, money, movies, join politics and what not. But other games suffer become they never get any support from Indian govt. This proves that we are still following the foreign invaders, cricket not being a game of Indian origin. Some people are highly against accepting English, why do they accept cricket in that case?
Mousumi Ghosh wrote:rambabu wrote:AKP wrote:Well, that's goes for interest. You may have madness on some other thing.
@Rambabu.. Correct.. Pasand apni apni
But people refuse to see their own madness. But point out at others' madness. A one sided view.
Certainly not, this cannot be one-sided, because Cricket is not the only game, because of so much importance, other games are suffering a huge loss. Why only cricketers get to have the cake and eat it too. They get name, fame, money, movies, join politics and what not. But other games suffer become they never get any support from Indian govt. This proves that we are still following the foreign invaders, cricket not being a game of Indian origin. Some people are highly against accepting English, why do they accept cricket in that case?
Oh, it's your concern. I understand it. Calling others likes as madness is mere dogmatism. It's a case of using a wrong word for a right thing.
RAMAKRISHNAN. A wrote:To accept a game we need not research for its country of origin. It depends on the beauty of the game and our sportsman spirit. Also, we cannot characterize a game as ‘madness’ just because we do not like it.
True. Very true. The beauty of the game is all that counts. Moreover, even if the game is not originated in India,it's more than greatness to out beat the country, from where it's originated.
@naruto