Unbelievable yet true!

Not very unbelievable incident.it's not the depression that made her kill her two children. She said that her husband did not help her in the upbringing of the children. In order to keep them quiet  as a disciplinary action, the woman killed her children. An extreme case of extreme disciplinary action.

rambabu wrote:

Not very unbelievable incident.it's not the depression that made her kill her two children. She said that her husband did not help her in the upbringing of the children. In order to keep them quiet  as a disciplinary action, the woman killed her children. An extreme case of extreme disciplinary action.

Yes, but her husband said that she was suffering from post-partum depression and it was more like giving a punishment to her husband by killing her 3 children.

Her statement was recorded by the police. And that's what i posted. Her husband's statement may not be true.

A woman would not normally harm her kids. Definitely she was facing very bizarre circumstances that led her to kill her kids. This is unfortunate. This is case of depression as she lost all hope to upbring the kids.  

This not a case of depression. The woman believed in resorting to extreme measures of discipline according to the link article.

I agree extreme depression has led to to take such a step. No woman of sound mind would ever do something like this. 

@Rambabu: I don't think you can discipline 6months old babies and 2 yr old toddler by slitting their throat, it is but a case of unsound mental health which has led to such consequences.

No woman can do such a cruel act to her kids in a normal state of mind. It might be a spontaneous reaction due to some arguments just before the incident resulting in unbearable mental situation. We cannot rely on their statements and stand on one person’s side, because their intentions will be to justify themselves and escape from the legal hands.

I too don't think  extreme discipline measures on a kid of 6 months old babe would discipline a crying kid. The woman has not thought of thinking why the baby is crying.

A person in depression can commit bizarre actions. Such persons can be manipulated by vested persons. 

Who may be the possible vested persons in this case?

The one who benefits from her actions. Investigations can reveal the beneficiary if there is one. 

Investigations are on. Till then let's stop guessing.

Same advice in Sunanda Pushkar case also?

Advises vary from case to case

Or from bias to bias.

WELL THAT'S UP TO YOU to decide

I don't think anybody would be benefited by such a inhuman act esp when committed on one's own children, but can definitely land the convicts in the jail or an asylum. With times changing people have low patience levels and can have dire consequences.

The only beneficiary is the woman who committed this heinous crime. She has satisfied her ego.

The woman is most likely suffering from severe depression and mania. Thank god the children are safe, the mother should be institutionalized!

rambabu wrote:

The only beneficiary is the woman who committed this heinous crime. She has satisfied her ego.

 

This is a biased conclusion without proof when investigations are still underway.