Bhagat Singh was branded as a terrorist and a traitor by the British. Of course it is but natural. But for India he remains a patriot . A great son of Mother India.
I respect Bhagat Singh as a great patriot ad martyr. Howevr terrorism is a different concept. a patriot can also be a terrorist. This depeds on the way he functions. The retaliatory killing of certan oficers of British and blasting bomb even though armless were definitely acts of terrorism Possibly, chandra shekhar Azad and others of the revolutionary outfit considered that such acts of terorsm could bring indpendence. They had also independent mind of their own and they acted in th way that though fit.
Here I am tempted to refer to Mahatama Gandhi's article 'The doctrine of sword' criticizing the armed revolutionaries to which they repliefd in another article 'Philosophy of the bomb' justifying terror. In fact. British were themselves terrorists. The Jalianwala masssacre of innocent citizens was by itsef a very shameful terrorist act to which the armed revolutionaries suitably retaliated.