Difference between Discussions and Arguments !

I agree. An argument generally leans towards showing One Upmanship. On the other hand discussions are arriving at a fact through exchange of views.

If argument comes from an experienced person who have sound knowledge in that line then we can consider the argument is right. If lot of people makes discussion and takes the decision and considering the argument then the final result will be very fine.

Most people confuse argument with discussion ...


{CJATTACHMENT ["id": 11091]}

Very true..but often discussions take the shape of arguments if we happen to disagree with certain things.

Most people confuse argument with discussion ...


{CJATTACHMENT ["id": 11091]}

Very true..but often discussions take the shape of arguments if we happen to disagree with certain things.

If discussions take the shape of arguments, it's a wrong trend.

Yes I totally agree with it. Discussion paves the way to new ideas and solutions through exchange of ideas. Ideas coming from different people might always not be right. Arguments should always be avoided as it may sometime take a negative turn.

Most people confuse argument with discussion ...


{CJATTACHMENT ["id": 11091]}

Very true..but often discussions take the shape of arguments if we happen to disagree with certain things.

If discussions take the shape of arguments, it's a wrong trend.

Yup, it is indeed wrong. But in a discussion people are more open to accepting things and are ready to mull over it whereas in an argument people only try to win over each other.

Most people confuse argument with discussion ...


{CJATTACHMENT ["id": 11091]}

Very true..but often discussions take the shape of arguments if we happen to disagree with certain things.

If discussions take the shape of arguments, it's a wrong trend.

Yup, it is indeed wrong. But in a discussion people are more open to accepting things and are ready to mull over it whereas in an argument people only try to win over each other.

As if argument is a competition. For such people Debating is the right platform. Argument should have content. Arguing for arguing plays a spoil sport in Arguments.

Argument is essential compnent of any meaningful discussion. There are always alternative and even oppoite altrnative courses of action and review. If you take a particular stand, you can't escape giving arguments for your stand. Debate is a competition with a topic For and against. But you cannot avoid arguments in any discussion. However what is significant is that arguments need be genuine and not for opposing somebody or some view blindly.

What i feel is that arguments are only needed when one is to prove himself clean and not guilty, as long that aspect is not involved there is no need of arguments in a discussion.

What i feel is that arguments are only needed when one is to prove himself clean and not guilty, as long that aspect is not involved there is no need of arguments in a discussion.

If there is content and stuff in the argument it should be accepted magnanimously.

What i feel is that arguments are only needed when one is to prove himself clean and not guilty, as long that aspect is not involved there is no need of arguments in a discussion.

If there is content and stuff in the argument it should be accepted magnanimously.

Don't you think discussion itself provides enough chances to prove your point, argument sounds more like a bitter/aggressive exchange of ideas.

What i feel is that arguments are only needed when one is to prove himself clean and not guilty, as long that aspect is not involved there is no need of arguments in a discussion.

If there is content and stuff in the argument it should be accepted magnanimously.

Don't you think discussion itself provides enough chances to prove your point, argument sounds more like a bitter/aggressive exchange of ideas.

The aggressive attitude was due to dogmatic views of the members who always endeavor to show their Oneupmanship. which is not a healthy trend. For them Debating is an ideal forum.

Discussions too can turn into arguments when there are different points of view and everyone feels they are right ! I feel it is natural when different opinions are put forth . We shd also be ble to accept different view points since certain matters can be represented and understood in different ways. What is needed is a broadminded view of ideas put forward by others .

What i feel is that arguments are only needed when one is to prove himself clean and not guilty, as long that aspect is not involved there is no need of arguments in a discussion.

If there is content and stuff in the argument it should be accepted magnanimously.

Don't you think discussion itself provides enough chances to prove your point, argument sounds more like a bitter/aggressive exchange of ideas.

To prove your point, you will say something and that something is argument. All that we need is that we should not be aggressive or disrespectful to contrary opinion.

What i feel is that arguments are only needed when one is to prove himself clean and not guilty, as long that aspect is not involved there is no need of arguments in a discussion.

If there is content and stuff in the argument it should be accepted magnanimously.

Don't you think discussion itself provides enough chances to prove your point, argument sounds more like a bitter/aggressive exchange of ideas.

To prove your point, you will say something and that something is argument. All that we need is that we should not be aggressive or disrespectful to contrary opinion.

It is difficult to actually draw a line as to what is aggressive or disrespectful, some people are over sensitive when it comes to any comments however harmless they may be , although they may pass careless remarks they are unable to take anything that is a little out of the way...I guess with so many people with different taste and personalities it is but natural to feel so...

What i feel is that arguments are only needed when one is to prove himself clean and not guilty, as long that aspect is not involved there is no need of arguments in a discussion.

If there is content and stuff in the argument it should be accepted magnanimously.

Don't you think discussion itself provides enough chances to prove your point, argument sounds more like a bitter/aggressive exchange of ideas.

To prove your point, you will say something and that something is argument. All that we need is that we should not be aggressive or disrespectful to contrary opinion.

It is difficult to actually draw a line as to what is aggressive or disrespectful, some people are over sensitive when it comes to any comments however harmless they may be , although they may pass careless remarks they are unable to take anything that is a little out of the way...I guess with so many people with different taste and personalities it is but natural to feel so...

As long as you give arguments in favor of your view without making personal comments on other members, this is okay. after all, when you present some view, you will give arguments. If members just state their views and not give arguments, this will not be discussion but merely an opinion poll.

Discussing on various topics usually helps in arriving at a decision, we get to know different perspective on a particular matter or issue, whereas, arguments don't really help in coming to a conclusion, people keep beating around the bush to prove their stance, which may or may not be correct.

Discussing on various topics usually helps in arriving at a decision, we get to know different perspective on a particular matter or issue, whereas, arguments don't really help in coming to a conclusion, people keep beating around the bush to prove their stance, which may or may not be correct.

The unhealthy trait of seeing the things from one's own point of view and sticking to it even though they know that they are wrong is a thing conspicuously visible in arguments. Such arguments end up in a stalemate.

Most people confuse argument with discussion ...


{CJATTACHMENT ["id": 11091]}

Discussion is an interactive and extended communication dealing with a particular subject, whereas argument is a contentious speech act, which can lead to dispute when there is strong disagreement. :whistle: :whistle:

Everything can be resolved if the real purpose of Discussion and Arguments are seen in their real perspective.