Homeopathy and Antibiotics

Homeopathic medicines ar e made of smaller doses of medicinal ingredients and they are now a more widely used alternative against antibiotics. Homeopathy is extremely beneficiary for treating children and babies because of their mild dosage. They are also useful in treating long-term and chronic disease where Allopathy has failed. Do you think homeopathy is now gaining its recognition day by day?

Homeopathy was always in demand and is still in demand. Allopathy only gives a short-term solution to any ailment, whereas homeopathy cures it completely. Also, it is great hit among tiny tots and kids of all ages.

While extolling the virtues of homeopathy it should not be forgotten that allopathy has given antibiotics which have saved millions of people from killer diseases. That diseases are caused by germs,viruses etc was unknown to these alternative systems. Ayurveda could not control small pox and cholera etc caused by bacteria because it did not know of their existence. Therefore each type of medicine has its pluses and minuses.

True..and agree that certain disease need allopathy but some long drawn ailment such as kidney stones, can be dealt using ayurvedic medicines. In fact every disease or ailment have to dealt differently and the choice depends on the patient.

In the recent times, the trend has changed even in advanced countries like America.
Have look at the findings of a research conducted at Harvard medical school
In 1997 Americans made 627 million visits to practitioners of alternative medicine and spent $27 billion of their own money to pay for alternative therapies. In contrast, Americans made only 386 million visits to their family doctor. It is estimated, by none other than the Harvard Medical School, that one out of every two persons in the United States between the ages of 35 and 49 years used at least one alternative therapy in 1997. That is a growth of 47.3 per cent since 1990. This is spectacular by any means and of great concern to conventional (allopathic) medicine especially since the people using alternative medicine are primarily well-educated, affluent baby boomers(1).

Yes homeopathy has its age-old demand and it is gaining its recognition day by day.

Also, sometimes certain maladies do not require medicine, here a holistic approach works best.

Many a times it is seen that a way a doctor talks with the patient takes away the worry that an ailment has caused and heals the patient.

If an ailment doesn't require medicines means the ailment can be taken care of by your inbuilt Immune system. That's why doctors in such cases would say, "You don't need medicines. Just have enough rest."

Sometimes prolonged use of Allopathic medicine can cause some serious damage to our immune system. In case of small children Allopathic medicine and antibiotics should be avoided as much as possible as it can destroy the body's immune system in the long run.

This is where the Alternative medicines succeed. Alternative medicines build up and strengthen the immune system and stops the recurrence of the ailment. It's not so in Allopathic medicines.

I am getting Homoepathetic treatment for skin disease and also muscle pain in neck. I have no other physical issue. Definitely this is a good system.

I am getting Homoepathetic treatment for skin disease and also muscle pain in neck. I have no other physical issue. Definitely this is a good system.

This fact is being realized now by the entire world now. All the alternative medicines are getting their due now.. It may take time. But ultimately all the alternative medicines including Homeopathy are going to to be the Mainstream medicines, which status is being enjoyed by Allopathic medicines.

Homeopathic medicines ar e made of smaller doses of medicinal ingredients and they are now a more widely used alternative against antibiotics. Homeopathy is extremely beneficiary for treating children and babies because of their mild dosage. They are also useful in treating long-term and chronic disease where Allopathy has failed. Do you think homeopathy is now gaining its recognition day by day?

Homeopathy was always in demand and is still in demand. Allopathy only gives a short-term solution to any ailment, whereas homeopathy cures it completely. Also, it is great hit among tiny tots and kids of all ages.

While extolling the virtues of homeopathy it should not be forgotten that allopathy has given antibiotics which have saved millions of people from killer diseases. That diseases are caused by germs,viruses etc was unknown to these alternative systems. Ayurveda could not control small pox and cholera etc caused by bacteria because it did not know of their existence. Therefore each type of medicine has its pluses and minuses.[/quo

True..and agree that certain disease need allopathy but some long drawn ailment such as kidney stones, can be dealt using ayurvedic medicines. In fact every disease or ailment have to dealt differently and the choice depends on the patient.

I know of two recent cases in which kidney stones where removed within 2-3 months of homeopathy treatment after allopathic treatment did not prove effective. Alternative medicines are effective but in many cases are not effective. The immense contribution of antibiotics should not be overlooked as these have saved millions of lives in times of disasters and war and have enabled the eradication of small pox and polio from the world. Alternate medicines could not do so. So all forms of medicine are important.

Homeopathic medicines ar e made of smaller doses of medicinal ingredients and they are now a more widely used alternative against antibiotics. Homeopathy is extremely beneficiary for treating children and babies because of their mild dosage. They are also useful in treating long-term and chronic disease where Allopathy has failed. Do you think homeopathy is now gaining its recognition day by day?

Homeopathy was always in demand and is still in demand. Allopathy only gives a short-term solution to any ailment, whereas homeopathy cures it completely. Also, it is great hit among tiny tots and kids of all ages.

While extolling the virtues of homeopathy it should not be forgotten that allopathy has given antibiotics which have saved millions of people from killer diseases. That diseases are caused by germs,viruses etc was unknown to these alternative systems. Ayurveda could not control small pox and cholera etc caused by bacteria because it did not know of their existence. Therefore each type of medicine has its pluses and minuses.[/quo

True..and agree that certain disease need allopathy but some long drawn ailment such as kidney stones, can be dealt using ayurvedic medicines. In fact every disease or ailment have to dealt differently and the choice depends on the patient.

I know of two recent cases in which kidney stones where removed within 2-3 months of homeopathy treatment after allopathic treatment did not prove effective. Alternative medicines are effective but in many cases are not effective. The immense contribution of antibiotics should not be overlooked as these have saved millions of lives in times of disasters and war and have enabled the eradication of small pox and polio from the world. Alternate medicines could not do so. So all forms of medicine are important.

Saved millions of people. Sent millions to hospitals for their side effects. Allopathic medicines suppress one ailment and creates two ailments.

Sometimes prolonged use of Allopathic medicine can cause some serious damage to our immune system. In case of small children Allopathic medicine and antibiotics should be avoided as much as possible as it can destroy the body's immune system in the long run.

I believe allopathic medicines should be used in limited quantity..until absolutely necessary.

Homeopathic medicines ar e made of smaller doses of medicinal ingredients and they are now a more widely used alternative against antibiotics. Homeopathy is extremely beneficiary for treating children and babies because of their mild dosage. They are also useful in treating long-term and chronic disease where Allopathy has failed. Do you think homeopathy is now gaining its recognition day by day?

Homeopathy was always in demand and is still in demand. Allopathy only gives a short-term solution to any ailment, whereas homeopathy cures it completely. Also, it is great hit among tiny tots and kids of all ages.

While extolling the virtues of homeopathy it should not be forgotten that allopathy has given antibiotics which have saved millions of people from killer diseases. That diseases are caused by germs,viruses etc was unknown to these alternative systems. Ayurveda could not control small pox and cholera etc caused by bacteria because it did not know of their existence. Therefore each type of medicine has its pluses and minuses.[/quo

True..and agree that certain disease need allopathy but some long drawn ailment such as kidney stones, can be dealt using ayurvedic medicines. In fact every disease or ailment have to dealt differently and the choice depends on the patient.

I know of two recent cases in which kidney stones where removed within 2-3 months of homeopathy treatment after allopathic treatment did not prove effective. Alternative medicines are effective but in many cases are not effective. The immense contribution of antibiotics should not be overlooked as these have saved millions of lives in times of disasters and war and have enabled the eradication of small pox and polio from the world. Alternate medicines could not do so. So all forms of medicine are important.

Saved millions of people. Sent millions to hospitals for their side effects. Allopathic medicines suppress one ailment and creates two ailments.

Wrong use of medicine does not mean medicine is to be blamed. Also side effects are of few certain long term medicines. Ayurveda medicines are containing lead etc which also are known to have created severe problems - but we do not blame ayurveda for it, the prescriptions may not be proper.

Homeopathic medicines ar e made of smaller doses of medicinal ingredients and they are now a more widely used alternative against antibiotics. Homeopathy is extremely beneficiary for treating children and babies because of their mild dosage. They are also useful in treating long-term and chronic disease where Allopathy has failed. Do you think homeopathy is now gaining its recognition day by day?

Homeopathy was always in demand and is still in demand. Allopathy only gives a short-term solution to any ailment, whereas homeopathy cures it completely. Also, it is great hit among tiny tots and kids of all ages.

While extolling the virtues of homeopathy it should not be forgotten that allopathy has given antibiotics which have saved millions of people from killer diseases. That diseases are caused by germs,viruses etc was unknown to these alternative systems. Ayurveda could not control small pox and cholera etc caused by bacteria because it did not know of their existence. Therefore each type of medicine has its pluses and minuses.[/quo

True..and agree that certain disease need allopathy but some long drawn ailment such as kidney stones, can be dealt using ayurvedic medicines. In fact every disease or ailment have to dealt differently and the choice depends on the patient.

I know of two recent cases in which kidney stones where removed within 2-3 months of homeopathy treatment after allopathic treatment did not prove effective. Alternative medicines are effective but in many cases are not effective. The immense contribution of antibiotics should not be overlooked as these have saved millions of lives in times of disasters and war and have enabled the eradication of small pox and polio from the world. Alternate medicines could not do so. So all forms of medicine are important.

Saved millions of people. Sent millions to hospitals for their side effects. Allopathic medicines suppress one ailment and creates two ailments.

Wrong use of medicine does not mean medicine is to be blamed. Also side effects are of few certain long term medicines. Ayurveda medicines are containing lead etc which also are known to have created severe problems - but we do not blame ayurveda for it, the prescriptions may not be proper.

Ayurveda may fail to cure an ailment. But it never causes side effects.

Homeopathic medicines ar e made of smaller doses of medicinal ingredients and they are now a more widely used alternative against antibiotics. Homeopathy is extremely beneficiary for treating children and babies because of their mild dosage. They are also useful in treating long-term and chronic disease where Allopathy has failed. Do you think homeopathy is now gaining its recognition day by day?

Homeopathy was always in demand and is still in demand. Allopathy only gives a short-term solution to any ailment, whereas homeopathy cures it completely. Also, it is great hit among tiny tots and kids of all ages.

While extolling the virtues of homeopathy it should not be forgotten that allopathy has given antibiotics which have saved millions of people from killer diseases. That diseases are caused by germs,viruses etc was unknown to these alternative systems. Ayurveda could not control small pox and cholera etc caused by bacteria because it did not know of their existence. Therefore each type of medicine has its pluses and minuses.[/quo

True..and agree that certain disease need allopathy but some long drawn ailment such as kidney stones, can be dealt using ayurvedic medicines. In fact every disease or ailment have to dealt differently and the choice depends on the patient.

I know of two recent cases in which kidney stones where removed within 2-3 months of homeopathy treatment after allopathic treatment did not prove effective. Alternative medicines are effective but in many cases are not effective. The immense contribution of antibiotics should not be overlooked as these have saved millions of lives in times of disasters and war and have enabled the eradication of small pox and polio from the world. Alternate medicines could not do so. So all forms of medicine are important.

Saved millions of people. Sent millions to hospitals for their side effects. Allopathic medicines suppress one ailment and creates two ailments.

Wrong use of medicine does not mean medicine is to be blamed. Also side effects are of few certain long term medicines. Ayurveda medicines are containing lead etc which also are known to have created severe problems - but we do not blame ayurveda for it, the prescriptions may not be proper.

Ayurveda may fail to cure an ailment. But it never causes side effects.

It is not true. all forms of medicines cause side effects - some less some less some more.

Homeopathic medicines ar e made of smaller doses of medicinal ingredients and they are now a more widely used alternative against antibiotics. Homeopathy is extremely beneficiary for treating children and babies because of their mild dosage. They are also useful in treating long-term and chronic disease where Allopathy has failed. Do you think homeopathy is now gaining its recognition day by day?

Homeopathy was always in demand and is still in demand. Allopathy only gives a short-term solution to any ailment, whereas homeopathy cures it completely. Also, it is great hit among tiny tots and kids of all ages.

While extolling the virtues of homeopathy it should not be forgotten that allopathy has given antibiotics which have saved millions of people from killer diseases. That diseases are caused by germs,viruses etc was unknown to these alternative systems. Ayurveda could not control small pox and cholera etc caused by bacteria because it did not know of their existence. Therefore each type of medicine has its pluses and minuses.[/quo

True..and agree that certain disease need allopathy but some long drawn ailment such as kidney stones, can be dealt using ayurvedic medicines. In fact every disease or ailment have to dealt differently and the choice depends on the patient.

I know of two recent cases in which kidney stones where removed within 2-3 months of homeopathy treatment after allopathic treatment did not prove effective. Alternative medicines are effective but in many cases are not effective. The immense contribution of antibiotics should not be overlooked as these have saved millions of lives in times of disasters and war and have enabled the eradication of small pox and polio from the world. Alternate medicines could not do so. So all forms of medicine are important.

Saved millions of people. Sent millions to hospitals for their side effects. Allopathic medicines suppress one ailment and creates two ailments.

Wrong use of medicine does not mean medicine is to be blamed. Also side effects are of few certain long term medicines. Ayurveda medicines are containing lead etc which also are known to have created severe problems - but we do not blame ayurveda for it, the prescriptions may not be proper.

Ayurveda may fail to cure an ailment. But it never causes side effects.

It is not true. all forms of medicines cause side effects - some less some less some more.

Its a fact established by no less than WHO

Homeopathic medicines ar e made of smaller doses of medicinal ingredients and they are now a more widely used alternative against antibiotics. Homeopathy is extremely beneficiary for treating children and babies because of their mild dosage. They are also useful in treating long-term and chronic disease where Allopathy has failed. Do you think homeopathy is now gaining its recognition day by day?

Homeopathy was always in demand and is still in demand. Allopathy only gives a short-term solution to any ailment, whereas homeopathy cures it completely. Also, it is great hit among tiny tots and kids of all ages.

While extolling the virtues of homeopathy it should not be forgotten that allopathy has given antibiotics which have saved millions of people from killer diseases. That diseases are caused by germs,viruses etc was unknown to these alternative systems. Ayurveda could not control small pox and cholera etc caused by bacteria because it did not know of their existence. Therefore each type of medicine has its pluses and minuses.[/quo



True..and agree that certain disease need allopathy but some long drawn ailment such as kidney stones, can be dealt using ayurvedic medicines. In fact every disease or ailment have to dealt differently and the choice depends on the patient.

I know of two recent cases in which kidney stones where removed within 2-3 months of homeopathy treatment after allopathic treatment did not prove effective. Alternative medicines are effective but in many cases are not effective. The immense contribution of antibiotics should not be overlooked as these have saved millions of lives in times of disasters and war and have enabled the eradication of small pox and polio from the world. Alternate medicines could not do so. So all forms of medicine are important.

Saved millions of people. Sent millions to hospitals for their side effects. Allopathic medicines suppress one ailment and creates two ailments.

Wrong use of medicine does not mean medicine is to be blamed. Also side effects are of few certain long term medicines. Ayurveda medicines are containing lead etc which also are known to have created severe problems - but we do not blame ayurveda for it, the prescriptions may not be proper.

Ayurveda may fail to cure an ailment. But it never causes side effects.

It is not true. all forms of medicines cause side effects - some less some less some more.

Its a fact established by no less than WHO

All I can say is having used all the three kinds of medicines at some point in my life -ayurvedic, homeopathic and allophatic....ayurvedic medicines didnot give any kind of reaction or side effect. Homeopathy has some amount of side effects and allopathic medicines at least for me have proved the worst.

The composition of homeopathic remedies are made by diluting the chosen substance with distilled water thus it's dosage is very mild and does not cause any harm or side effect.

The composition of homeopathic remedies are made by diluting the chosen substance with distilled water thus it's dosage is very mild and does not cause any harm or side effect.

I agree with you. A Homeopathic medicine never caused any side effect for me too. These medicines may not give instant results. But they are sure cure even for chronic ailments.

The composition of homeopathic remedies are made by diluting the chosen substance with distilled water thus it's dosage is very mild and does not cause any harm or side effect.

I think it also depends on how a body reacts to a medicines...homeo medicines work best for kids, but for quick cure we do go for allophatic medicines.

The composition of homeopathic remedies are made by diluting the chosen substance with distilled water thus it's dosage is very mild and does not cause any harm or side effect.

I think it also depends on how a body reacts to a medicines...homeo medicines work best for kids, but for quick cure we do go for allophatic medicines.

For quick cure allopathy is good. But with the same quickness, it brings a new ailment. I was given a medicine for indigestion. Indigestion came to an end constipation started.