Gujrat emerging as a manufacturing hub..

All through their election campaign BJP and PM candidate Modi had been highlighting the growth of Gujrat and now this view is being endorsed by ASSOCHAM ( Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India) as well..

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Gujarat-emerging-as-manufacturing-hub-Assocham/articleshow/37129416.cms

Even before the election Gujrat was well known for its Industry friendly policies. The industry lobby's secretary general D S Rawat 's statement says as of March 2013, the investments in Gujrat was mind boggling over 122 Trillion. This says it all.

All through their election campaign BJP and PM candidate Modi had been highlighting the growth of Gujrat and now this view is being endorsed by ASSOCHAM ( Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India) as well..

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Gujarat-emerging-as-manufacturing-hub-Assocham/articleshow/37129416.cms

Surprisingly electronic medias ignore this as they have hue and cry over spilling of beans any time negative in the past.

Both media, electronic and print are voicing at the top of their voice about the Industrial friendly policies of Gujrat and the state's resounding success reached beyond frontiers. That's why foreign investors are flocking around Gujrat.

Major industries are planning to invest into Gujarat because of the friendly environment created there with regard to power supply, infra structure, good roads etc which are all essential...

Major industries are planning to invest into Gujarat because of the friendly environment created there with regard to power supply, infra structure, good roads etc which are all essential...

security, no red tapisms, immediate decison making which is making it gold mine for investors.

Major industries are planning to invest into Gujarat because of the friendly environment created there with regard to power supply, infra structure, good roads etc which are all essential...

This in turn creates employment opportunities and creation of subsidiary cottage industries.

All through their election campaign BJP and PM candidate Modi had been highlighting the growth of Gujrat and now this view is being endorsed by ASSOCHAM ( Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India) as well..

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Gujarat-emerging-as-manufacturing-hub-Assocham/articleshow/37129416.cms

Surprisingly electronic medias ignore this as they have hue and cry over spilling of beans any time negative in the past.

Electronic and paper media, both have been ignoring these facts and crying over other issues, may be the failure of parties that control these media to achieve what has been done is Gujrat may account for their ignorant attitude!

In comparison to other states Gujarat had and has many advantages. During the American Civil War in the late 1800's, the supply of cotton from USA was severely disrupted. This created a tremendous demand for Gujarat cotton and fetched very high prices. It was exported from Bombay port. This brought considerable capital into the Gujarat region and was responsible for setting up of hundreds of cotton factories in Gujarat and in Mumbai. At one time around 1947 there were nearly 400 big and small cotton mills in Ahmedabad alone. After 1947 many of these industrialists moved away from cotton textiles and started investing in the chemical industries. By mid 1960's the textile industry had suffered a slump , but Gujarat had a large number of chemical industries and with oil and gas from Ankleshwar it got a big boost. Capital flow into Gujarat has continued to flow from its NRI community, earlier from Africa and now from USA , Canada and UK primarily. This infusion of capital has improved the towns and villages of Gujarat considerably. Adopton of modern technology by small and big industries is very fast in Gujarat due to its tradition of constant interaction with foreigners. Yet another big plus point is the fact that the state PSU's are not interfered by politicians whether they are from Congress or BJP. This is a reason why almost all of them are doing very good and command good prices in the share market.

However all the above has been possible because the average Gujarati is peace loving, practoical, financially prudent and is not provincial minded. In Surat the local municipal schools are run where eleven languages are taught like Bengali,Oriya etc for the benefit of the large number of migrant workers from other states. Modi very aptly has capitalized on these and other traits he inherited from previous governments and successfully marketed the concept of Gujarat for other states to follow.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Where will the capital come from. Merely wishing potential is not enough it leads to overstaments.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Where will the capital come from. Merely wishing potential is not enough it leads to overstaments.

I'm from the coastal AP. Capital generation out of the existing resources is the job of the government. What i said is truth but bitter.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Where will the capital come from. Merely wishing potential is not enough it leads to overstaments.

I'm from the coastal AP. Capital generation out of the existing resources is the job of the government. What i said is truth but bitter.

The East India Company and British rule successfully made India capital deficit and this has left a big void in our surplus finances. Governments have limitations as notes cannot be printed - that would be disasterous and capital in form of FDI has to be selectively brought in so that it does not cause injury to local industry. It therefore is basically a slow and steady process. Prices will keep going up till economy attains equilibrium. One way to enrich the country is by increasing exports - but demand in other countries is not in our control.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Where will the capital come from. Merely wishing potential is not enough it leads to overstaments.

I'm from the coastal AP. Capital generation out of the existing resources is the job of the government. What i said is truth but bitter.

The East India Company and British rule successfully made India capital deficit and this has left a big void in our surplus finances. Governments have limitations as notes cannot be printed - that would be disasterous and capital in form of FDI has to be selectively brought in so that it does not cause injury to local industry. It therefore is basically a slow and steady process. Prices will keep going up till economy attains equilibrium. One way to enrich the country is by increasing exports - but demand in other countries is not in our control.

Boosting exports is on the top of theagenda in the new Governments Policy.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Where will the capital come from. Merely wishing potential is not enough it leads to overstaments.

I'm from the coastal AP. Capital generation out of the existing resources is the job of the government. What i said is truth but bitter.

The East India Company and British rule successfully made India capital deficit and this has left a big void in our surplus finances. Governments have limitations as notes cannot be printed - that would be disasterous and capital in form of FDI has to be selectively brought in so that it does not cause injury to local industry. It therefore is basically a slow and steady process. Prices will keep going up till economy attains equilibrium. One way to enrich the country is by increasing exports - but demand in other countries is not in our control.

Boosting exports is on the top of theagenda in the new Governments Policy.

It has been on the top of the agenda of all governments. Sun has not risen on May 16th.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Where will the capital come from. Merely wishing potential is not enough it leads to overstaments.

I'm from the coastal AP. Capital generation out of the existing resources is the job of the government. What i said is truth but bitter.

The East India Company and British rule successfully made India capital deficit and this has left a big void in our surplus finances. Governments have limitations as notes cannot be printed - that would be disasterous and capital in form of FDI has to be selectively brought in so that it does not cause injury to local industry. It therefore is basically a slow and steady process. Prices will keep going up till economy attains equilibrium. One way to enrich the country is by increasing exports - but demand in other countries is not in our control.

Boosting exports is on the top of theagenda in the new Governments Policy.

It has been on the top of the agenda of all governments. Sun has not risen on May 16th.

It will rise and fill India with a different sunlight.

Higher duty on imports also making situation nice as in the long run in house production will grow.