Modi has reaped the benefits of what he sowed. Modi contested elections on the issue of good governance. anna and Kejriwal highlighted the scams and corruption. This is okay so far. But anarchy was also part of the anna and kejriwal movement. People would install a government that governs and not a government that destabilizes, promotes anarchy and does not solve peoples' problems. Although I do not agree with BJP and RSS philosphy, the fact remains that BJP is principal party in India. Congress could be replaced by BJP and not Kejriwal. This is obvious. Now let us hope that the new government will give good governance and solve unemployment and rising prices issue.
I think people know only about a stable government. They do not care if it's anarchy or otherwise. By voting for a single party to power the people are more inclined for a stable government for a full tenure. Other things stand invalid.
'Anarchy' means 'no stability and chaos.' Obviously, if you like stability, you will not choose anyone who is anarchic. In fact, BJP and NDA only were hoping for stable government. Kejriwal was only parroting that there would be hung parliament, AAP would get 100 seats, we are going through temporary phase of churning (manthan) and there would be another election after a year when there would be clear mandate
Obviously, Kejriwal was for instability and chaos. So whatever hard work he did was of no use 5to people. .