Is Presidential system more effective ?

Yes In India there are more department so more corruption its should be operated from President.

One incident should not be an example to change things. Anyone can experience low times - the same goes for countries too.

There are many reasins why this happened and it is not just because of the presidential system alone...Their economy has been steadily in recession for the past 3 or 4 years and it has to reach rock bottom before picking up again..

The United states government could not get budget passed and consequently even salary of staff can't be paid. Many departments have to be closed. This should be a lesson to those who so strongly clamor for american Presidential system.

http://zeenews.india.com/business/news/international/political-deadlock-over-obamacare-forces-shutdown-in-us_85711.html

Gulshan ji no one system is perfect one. Our Prime Minister is also not perfect system.

I don't think presidential system is the only reason behind this deadlock , this can happen in any system. This is kind of problem we face in parliament when passing of any financial bill can take an ugly shape if our political parties/parliament pass bills without debating or amendments after keeping house shut for months.

If properly run and administered, any kind of system will work including dictatorship. Are we not seeing the so called the best form of government " Democratic form of government" being misused in all possible forms ? It's not the form of governance, it's the ability of the people who run it that counts.

Yes In India there are more department so more corruption its should be operated from President.

I Hope you have not understood the thread. This is about presidential system versus parliamentary democracy. Many praise. Presidential system and advocate that for India. They say that President being directly elected, the govt is more stable. The current crisis shows shortcoming of that system.

In India, President functions only through Union council of minister and so the suggestion of President directly operating some departments is without any substance.

The United states government could not get budget passed and consequently even salary of staff can't be paid. Many departments have to be closed. This should be a lesson to those who so strongly clamor for american Presidential system.

http://zeenews.india.com/business/news/international/political-deadlock-over-obamacare-forces-shutdown-in-us_85711.html

Gulshan ji no one system is perfect one. Our Prime Minister is also not perfect system.

The question is that as long as Prime minister has majority in parliamentary, the government is stable and working. But in U.S.A., President is stable but his government can be crippled as the current events show.

The United states government could not get budget passed and consequently even salary of staff can't be paid. Many departments have to be closed. This should be a lesson to those who so strongly clamor for american Presidential system.

http://zeenews.india.com/business/news/international/political-deadlock-over-obamacare-forces-shutdown-in-us_85711.html

This is not first time happen there, in America, there are not salaried class and long term government jobs as India, they are now free to join any organization, this time there is stale mate in their Congress over passing of one important welfare scheme named after President, and for this he has shown his power of stopping some departments, it is not comparable entirely with India,