Bad news for political class

There can never be any bad news for powerful politicians. Supreme court has merely decided on basis of existing law. But parliament has passed amendment to law that nullifies supreme court decision. It is always politicians who have last laugh. In fact, Supreme Court judge commented that they interpreted only the law and are aware that an amendment to the law is under consideration in parliament. Parliament can always amend a law.

There can never be any bad news for powerful politicians. Supreme court has merely decided on basis of existing law. But parliament has passed amendment to law that nullifies supreme court decision. It is always politicians who have last laugh. In fact, Supreme Court judge commented that they interpreted only the law and are aware that an amendment to the law is under consideration in parliament. Parliament can always amend a law.

True. That's the misfortune of this country. But let's see the reactions and actions in the parliament in the coming parliament sessions.

Yeah, that is something concrete now. I really like the decision taken by the Apex Court. There are so many cases in India where literally criminals are seated in the Houses. I hope this will hold some of them back, though not all, I am sure.

Yeah, that is something concrete now. I really like the decision taken by the Apex Court. There are so many cases in India where literally criminals are seated in the Houses. I hope this will hold some of them back, though not all, I am sure.

Let's cross our fingers and wait what's in store for us. The time for revolutionary changes has come.Its just the beginning.

According to Supreme court , any lawmaker convicted from now for an offence punishable with a sentence of two years or more will be immediately unseated, and will be barred from contesting elections for at least six years.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/From-now-lawmakers-who-get-two-years-in-jail-will-lose-seats/articleshow/22379224.cms

Supreme court's duty is to properly judge the cases according to law made by lawmakers. SC can at best suggest and remind but cannot make new laws on its own. When lawmakers are involved or interfered in a matter going against them, they find a way to correct it in their own favor sooner than later, without wasting a moment even if they have to call for extra session of house. So rest assured nothing is going to stop more and more 'big ones' from elections and seeing them in different houses. Cheers.

Yeah, that is something concrete now. I really like the decision taken by the Apex Court. There are so many cases in India where literally criminals are seated in the Houses. I hope this will hold some of them back, though not all, I am sure.

Let's cross our fingers and wait what's in store for us. The time for revolutionary changes has come.Its just the beginning.

This is the second important ruling after the RTI law, I suppose. And if such candidates won't be in the fray, they won't get elected either. As there have been examples where people got elected from inside jails too.

Most parties are already opposing such a move and will fight tooth and nail to see that it does not get passed...SP, BSP, TMC and many other parties have already shown their opposition to this amendment ! I have my own doubts as to whether it will come through at all ! We are stuck for life with criminal politicians :angry:

Most parties are already opposing such a move and will fight tooth and nail to see that it does not get passed...SP, BSP, TMC and many other parties have already shown their opposition to this amendment ! I have my own doubts as to whether it will come through at all ! We are stuck for life with criminal politicians :angry:

Parliament is super authority than supreme court. Now Parliament Neutralize this order of supreme court by amendment in constitution. It is now in hand of voter to say good bye to criminal politicians.

Most parties are already opposing such a move and will fight tooth and nail to see that it does not get passed...SP, BSP, TMC and many other parties have already shown their opposition to this amendment ! I have my own doubts as to whether it will come through at all ! We are stuck for life with criminal politicians :angry:

Parliament is super authority than supreme court. Now Parliament Neutralize this order of supreme court by amendment in constitution. It is now in hand of voter to say good bye to criminal politicians.

Of course this is for people to reject the politicians involved in criminal acts. But usually, people elect them for other reasons. .

There can never be any bad news for powerful politicians. Supreme court has merely decided on basis of existing law. But parliament has passed amendment to law that nullifies supreme court decision. It is always politicians who have last laugh. In fact, Supreme Court judge commented that they interpreted only the law and are aware that an amendment to the law is under consideration in parliament. Parliament can always amend a law.

Then what the hell laws are for..... why supreme court is in picutre in that case.. Let parliament create the laws... total s**t system...

There can never be any bad news for powerful politicians. Supreme court has merely decided on basis of existing law. But parliament has passed amendment to law that nullifies supreme court decision. It is always politicians who have last laugh. In fact, Supreme Court judge commented that they interpreted only the law and are aware that an amendment to the law is under consideration in parliament. Parliament can always amend a law.

Then what the hell laws are for..... why supreme court is in picutre in that case.. Let parliament create the laws... total s**t system...

Supreme Court can interpret law and not make this. Supreme Court also can invalidate law if that is unconstitutional. Rightly, Parliament creates law as that have that power. But supreme Court can interpret this and decide cases according to law as made by parliament. There is division of authority between legislature (parliament), executive (Union cabinet) and judiciary (Supreme Court). Similarly in states.

There can never be any bad news for powerful politicians. Supreme court has merely decided on basis of existing law. But parliament has passed amendment to law that nullifies supreme court decision. It is always politicians who have last laugh. In fact, Supreme Court judge commented that they interpreted only the law and are aware that an amendment to the law is under consideration in parliament. Parliament can always amend a law.

Then what the hell laws are for..... why supreme court is in picutre in that case.. Let parliament create the laws... total s**t system...

Supreme Court can interpret law and not make this. Supreme Court also can invalidate law if that is unconstitutional. Rightly, Parliament creates law as that have that power. But supreme Court can interpret this and decide cases according to law as made by parliament. There is division of authority between legislature (parliament), executive (Union cabinet) and judiciary (Supreme Court). Similarly in states.

When public disappointed with legislature that what they can do?

There can never be any bad news for powerful politicians. Supreme court has merely decided on basis of existing law. But parliament has passed amendment to law that nullifies supreme court decision. It is always politicians who have last laugh. In fact, Supreme Court judge commented that they interpreted only the law and are aware that an amendment to the law is under consideration in parliament. Parliament can always amend a law.

Then what the hell laws are for..... why supreme court is in picutre in that case.. Let parliament create the laws... total s**t system...

Supreme Court can interpret law and not make this. Supreme Court also can invalidate law if that is unconstitutional. Rightly, Parliament creates law as that have that power. But supreme Court can interpret this and decide cases according to law as made by parliament. There is division of authority between legislature (parliament), executive (Union cabinet) and judiciary (Supreme Court). Similarly in states.

When public disappointed with legislature that what they can do?

The only option left for public is to break their head against a wall....do we have any say in any matter ? do we have a voice at all except during the time of election when the candidates will come in front of you to your doorsteps with folded hands , bowed heads and artificial smiles...

There can never be any bad news for powerful politicians. Supreme court has merely decided on basis of existing law. But parliament has passed amendment to law that nullifies supreme court decision. It is always politicians who have last laugh. In fact, Supreme Court judge commented that they interpreted only the law and are aware that an amendment to the law is under consideration in parliament. Parliament can always amend a law.

Then what the hell laws are for..... why supreme court is in picutre in that case.. Let parliament create the laws... total s**t system...

Supreme Court can interpret law and not make this. Supreme Court also can invalidate law if that is unconstitutional. Rightly, Parliament creates law as that have that power. But supreme Court can interpret this and decide cases according to law as made by parliament. There is division of authority between legislature (parliament), executive (Union cabinet) and judiciary (Supreme Court). Similarly in states.

When public disappointed with legislature that what they can do?

The only option left for public is to break their head against a wall....do we have any say in any matter ? do we have a voice at all except during the time of election when the candidates will come in front of you to your doorsteps with folded hands , bowed heads and artificial smiles...

If you were able to read their mind, you would read absolutely opposite in their minds what their faces reflect during election period. They look at voter as a future BAKRA, waiting to come under their knife ready to eat RAW. Voter is their chicken and mutton.

There can never be any bad news for powerful politicians. Supreme court has merely decided on basis of existing law. But parliament has passed amendment to law that nullifies supreme court decision. It is always politicians who have last laugh. In fact, Supreme Court judge commented that they interpreted only the law and are aware that an amendment to the law is under consideration in parliament. Parliament can always amend a law.

Then what the hell laws are for..... why supreme court is in picutre in that case.. Let parliament create the laws... total s**t system...

Supreme Court can interpret law and not make this. Supreme Court also can invalidate law if that is unconstitutional. Rightly, Parliament creates law as that have that power. But supreme Court can interpret this and decide cases according to law as made by parliament. There is division of authority between legislature (parliament), executive (Union cabinet) and judiciary (Supreme Court). Similarly in states.

When public disappointed with legislature that what they can do?

The only option left for public is to break their head against a wall....do we have any say in any matter ? do we have a voice at all except during the time of election when the candidates will come in front of you to your doorsteps with folded hands , bowed heads and artificial smiles...

If you were able to read their mind, you would read absolutely opposite in their minds what their faces reflect during election period. They look at voter as a future BAKRA, waiting to come under their knife ready to eat RAW. Voter is their chicken and mutton.

Let's see the things in the real perspective. Tell me are we not BAKRAS? Had we not Bakras, do you think these thugs would have remained in the scene ?

There can never be any bad news for powerful politicians. Supreme court has merely decided on basis of existing law. But parliament has passed amendment to law that nullifies supreme court decision. It is always politicians who have last laugh. In fact, Supreme Court judge commented that they interpreted only the law and are aware that an amendment to the law is under consideration in parliament. Parliament can always amend a law.

Then what the hell laws are for..... why supreme court is in picutre in that case.. Let parliament create the laws... total s**t system...

Supreme Court can interpret law and not make this. Supreme Court also can invalidate law if that is unconstitutional. Rightly, Parliament creates law as that have that power. But supreme Court can interpret this and decide cases according to law as made by parliament. There is division of authority between legislature (parliament), executive (Union cabinet) and judiciary (Supreme Court). Similarly in states.

When public disappointed with legislature that what they can do?

The only option left for public is to break their head against a wall....do we have any say in any matter ? do we have a voice at all except during the time of election when the candidates will come in front of you to your doorsteps with folded hands , bowed heads and artificial smiles...

If you were able to read their mind, you would read absolutely opposite in their minds what their faces reflect during election period. They look at voter as a future BAKRA, waiting to come under their knife ready to eat RAW. Voter is their chicken and mutton.

Yes voter know that they are Bakra and chicken but they have any other option than went under their knife. Whether knife fall on apple or apple fall on knife, only apple will be sacrificed.

There can never be any bad news for powerful politicians. Supreme court has merely decided on basis of existing law. But parliament has passed amendment to law that nullifies supreme court decision. It is always politicians who have last laugh. In fact, Supreme Court judge commented that they interpreted only the law and are aware that an amendment to the law is under consideration in parliament. Parliament can always amend a law.

Then what the hell laws are for..... why supreme court is in picutre in that case.. Let parliament create the laws... total s**t system...

Supreme Court can interpret law and not make this. Supreme Court also can invalidate law if that is unconstitutional. Rightly, Parliament creates law as that have that power. But supreme Court can interpret this and decide cases according to law as made by parliament. There is division of authority between legislature (parliament), executive (Union cabinet) and judiciary (Supreme Court). Similarly in states.

When public disappointed with legislature that what they can do?

The only option left for public is to break their head against a wall....do we have any say in any matter ? do we have a voice at all except during the time of election when the candidates will come in front of you to your doorsteps with folded hands , bowed heads and artificial smiles...

If you were able to read their mind, you would read absolutely opposite in their minds what their faces reflect during election period. They look at voter as a future BAKRA, waiting to come under their knife ready to eat RAW. Voter is their chicken and mutton.

Yes voter know that they are Bakra and chicken but they have any other option than went under their knife. Whether knife fall on apple or apple fall on knife, only apple will be sacrificed.

Its high time we the Bakras should come of age and become lions. And prove that people power can shake the foundations of the fragile structures built by Netas.
Recent agitation of APNGOS against the bifurcation of the state has become a huge success that shook the capital New Delhi. The highlight of the agitation is the entire movement was led by ordinary people. They did not allow any politician come near them.

According to Supreme court , any lawmaker convicted from now for an offence punishable with a sentence of two years or more will be immediately unseated, and will be barred from contesting elections for at least six years.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/From-now-lawmakers-who-get-two-years-in-jail-will-lose-seats/articleshow/22379224.cms

The honorable Supreme Court of India is the custodian of democracy, and from time to time it will observe any actions on the part of government is encroaching upon the tenets of constitution then it will safeguard it.

There can never be any bad news for powerful politicians. Supreme court has merely decided on basis of existing law. But parliament has passed amendment to law that nullifies supreme court decision. It is always politicians who have last laugh. In fact, Supreme Court judge commented that they interpreted only the law and are aware that an amendment to the law is under consideration in parliament. Parliament can always amend a law.

Then what the hell laws are for..... why supreme court is in picutre in that case.. Let parliament create the laws... total s**t system...

Supreme Court can interpret law and not make this. Supreme Court also can invalidate law if that is unconstitutional. Rightly, Parliament creates law as that have that power. But supreme Court can interpret this and decide cases according to law as made by parliament. There is division of authority between legislature (parliament), executive (Union cabinet) and judiciary (Supreme Court). Similarly in states.

When public disappointed with legislature that what they can do?

The only option left for public is to break their head against a wall....do we have any say in any matter ? do we have a voice at all except during the time of election when the candidates will come in front of you to your doorsteps with folded hands , bowed heads and artificial smiles...

If you were able to read their mind, you would read absolutely opposite in their minds what their faces reflect during election period. They look at voter as a future BAKRA, waiting to come under their knife ready to eat RAW. Voter is their chicken and mutton.

Yes voter know that they are Bakra and chicken but they have any other option than went under their knife. Whether knife fall on apple or apple fall on knife, only apple will be sacrificed.

Its high time we the Bakras should come of age and become lions. And prove that people power can shake the foundations of the fragile structures built by Netas.
Recent agitation of APNGOS against the bifurcation of the state has become a huge success that shook the capital New Delhi. The highlight of the agitation is the entire movement was led by ordinary people. They did not allow any politician come near them.

Many time peoples show mirror to politicians. They were always select best one from their point of view but later all will proved cheater and frauds. Indian politics in heaven for criminals. Here solo condition of selecting candidates by the parties is"who can win". I think Asha Ram should be make a new party or join any existing party.

There can never be any bad news for powerful politicians. Supreme court has merely decided on basis of existing law. But parliament has passed amendment to law that nullifies supreme court decision. It is always politicians who have last laugh. In fact, Supreme Court judge commented that they interpreted only the law and are aware that an amendment to the law is under consideration in parliament. Parliament can always amend a law.

Then what the hell laws are for..... why supreme court is in picutre in that case.. Let parliament create the laws... total s**t system...

Supreme Court can interpret law and not make this. Supreme Court also can invalidate law if that is unconstitutional. Rightly, Parliament creates law as that have that power. But supreme Court can interpret this and decide cases according to law as made by parliament. There is division of authority between legislature (parliament), executive (Union cabinet) and judiciary (Supreme Court). Similarly in states.

When public disappointed with legislature that what they can do?

The only option left for public is to break their head against a wall....do we have any say in any matter ? do we have a voice at all except during the time of election when the candidates will come in front of you to your doorsteps with folded hands , bowed heads and artificial smiles...

If you were able to read their mind, you would read absolutely opposite in their minds what their faces reflect during election period. They look at voter as a future BAKRA, waiting to come under their knife ready to eat RAW. Voter is their chicken and mutton.

Yes voter know that they are Bakra and chicken but they have any other option than went under their knife. Whether knife fall on apple or apple fall on knife, only apple will be sacrificed.

Its high time we the Bakras should come of age and become lions. And prove that people power can shake the foundations of the fragile structures built by Netas.
Recent agitation of APNGOS against the bifurcation of the state has become a huge success that shook the capital New Delhi. The highlight of the agitation is the entire movement was led by ordinary people. They did not allow any politician come near them.

Many time peoples show mirror to politicians. They were always select best one from their point of view but later all will proved cheater and frauds. Indian politics in heaven for criminals. Here solo condition of selecting candidates by the parties is"who can win". I think Asha Ram should be make a new party or join any existing party.

You are right. I'll not be surprised if Asaram bapu comes up with a new party. This way he can avoid arrest and earn more than what he's earning now.