There is special emphasis on Marxist education and class concept in Vietnam. Is this not Communist version of saffron education in India?
http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/08/16/marxist-majors-wanted-in-vietnam/
12 Replies
There is special emphasis on Marxist education and class concept in Vietnam. Is this not Communist version of saffron education in India?
http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/08/16/marxist-majors-wanted-in-vietnam/
They want to create rebellious people in their country i think. They want to create a class that purely believes in logic and Indian education is teaching the opposite. Just believe what we are teaching you.. don't try to be over smart.. thats the concept in India..
There is special emphasis on Marxist education and class concept in Vietnam. Is this not Communist version of saffron education in India?
http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/08/16/marxist-majors-wanted-in-vietnam/
They want to create rebellious people in their country i think. They want to create a class that purely believes in logic and Indian education is teaching the opposite. Just believe what we are teaching you.. don't try to be over smart.. thats the concept in India..
Although it is not as bad as Brit educationist Micheal left it way back but it needs a lot of changes according to our needs.
I do not want to make comments on a country's internal matter, what they teach in vietnam to their students is none of our business.
Making comments on such matters by ordinary citizens like us is not interference. There is no demand for interference by government of India. Of course, this is their internal affairs. If we stretch the argument of 'internal affairs' so much, we should never discuss Abraham Lincoln, Churchill, Marx, Lenin, Mao and their policies as these must be 'internal affairs'. The French revolution and Russina revolution were also internal matters.
I do not want to make comments on a country's internal matter, what they teach in vietnam to their students is none of our business.
Making comments on such matters by ordinary citizens like us is not interference. There is no demand for interference by government of India. Of course, this is their internal affairs. If we stretch the argument of 'internal affairs' so much, we should never discuss Abraham Lincoln, Churchill, Marx, Lenin, Mao and their policies as these must be 'internal affairs'. The French revolution and Russina revolution were also internal matters.
Exactly, we never know about secret of Vietnam government' s decision about such policies so it is safer to avoid such matters. Likewise if we do not know secret of our own governmental decisions regarding their policies, how would we know about other governments! That was my point.
There is special emphasis on Marxist education and class concept in Vietnam. Is this not Communist version of saffron education in India?
http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/08/16/marxist-majors-wanted-in-vietnam/
They want to create rebellious people in their country i think. They want to create a class that purely believes in logic and Indian education is teaching the opposite. Just believe what we are teaching you.. don't try to be over smart.. thats the concept in India..
Although it is not as bad as Brit educationist Micheal left it way back but it needs a lot of changes according to our needs.
Yes Sunil. I agree on that point. We are getting better by time , but still lot of revolution in edudation system is needed..
I do not want to make comments on a country's internal matter, what they teach in vietnam to their students is none of our business.
Making comments on such matters by ordinary citizens like us is not interference. There is no demand for interference by government of India. Of course, this is their internal affairs. If we stretch the argument of 'internal affairs' so much, we should never discuss Abraham Lincoln, Churchill, Marx, Lenin, Mao and their policies as these must be 'internal affairs'. The French revolution and Russina revolution were also internal matters.
Exactly, we never know about secret of Vietnam government' s decision about such policies so it is safer to avoid such matters. Likewise if we do not know secret of our own governmental decisions regarding their policies, how would we know about other governments! That was my point.
As I provided link, the education policy is not secret. It is usually defence matters that are secret. I just wanted to stress that the BJP saffronizing education is states ruled by them and adding Marxist content by Vietnam are similar.
This topic is new to me, Vietnam was a Marxist country, if I recall my history memory from school, That article summarize with "Vietnam refuses to abandon its authoritarian Communist regime, yet embraces capitalism in an effort to modernize its economy." What is the benefit of such education where MNCs will not employ you on the basis of your political identity, something is wrong there, they are opening their market on one side and on the other side, they are still sticking to their past glues.
On the other hand this is not comparable with Safron education as, Communism and democracy are two principal administrative politico theories, on the other hand, for communism, religion is opium to society, but democracy accepts all religions, and here political parties here adhere to one religion or the other, as many pundits would agree that, many successful democracies support one religion or the other.
On the other hand this is not comparable with Safron education as, Communism and democracy are two principal administrative politico theories, on the other hand, for communism, religion is opium to society, but democracy accepts all religions, and here political parties here adhere to one religion or the other, as many pundits would agree that, many successful democracies support one religion or the other.
This topic is new to me, Vietnam was a Marxist country, if I recall my history memory from school, That article summarize with "Vietnam refuses to abandon its authoritarian Communist regime, yet embraces capitalism in an effort to modernize its economy." What is the benefit of such education where MNCs will not employ you on the basis of your political identity, something is wrong there, they are opening their market on one side and on the other side, they are still sticking to their past glues.
On the other hand this is not comparable with Safron education as, Communism and democracy are two principal administrative politico theories, on the other hand, for communism, religion is opium to society, but democracy accepts all religions, and here political parties here adhere to one religion or the other, as many pundits would agree that, many successful democracies support one religion or the other.
But 'saffron' block is also not democratic. They are virtually fascist. Hence the comparison.
There is special emphasis on Marxist education and class concept in Vietnam. Is this not Communist version of saffron education in India?
http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/08/16/marxist-majors-wanted-in-vietnam/
Education is education what ever we called it, red education, saffron education, green education or white education.
This topic is new to me, Vietnam was a Marxist country, if I recall my history memory from school, That article summarize with "Vietnam refuses to abandon its authoritarian Communist regime, yet embraces capitalism in an effort to modernize its economy." What is the benefit of such education where MNCs will not employ you on the basis of your political identity, something is wrong there, they are opening their market on one side and on the other side, they are still sticking to their past glues.
On the other hand this is not comparable with Safron education as, Communism and democracy are two principal administrative politico theories, on the other hand, for communism, religion is opium to society, but democracy accepts all religions, and here political parties here adhere to one religion or the other, as many pundits would agree that, many successful democracies support one religion or the other.
But 'saffron' block is also not democratic. They are virtually fascist. Hence the comparison.
'Saffron Block' is only a psycho state or mentality of so called pseudo secular which does not and cannot exist in our country having such an over friendly atmosphere.
This topic is new to me, Vietnam was a Marxist country, if I recall my history memory from school, That article summarize with "Vietnam refuses to abandon its authoritarian Communist regime, yet embraces capitalism in an effort to modernize its economy." What is the benefit of such education where MNCs will not employ you on the basis of your political identity, something is wrong there, they are opening their market on one side and on the other side, they are still sticking to their past glues.
On the other hand this is not comparable with Safron education as, Communism and democracy are two principal administrative politico theories, on the other hand, for communism, religion is opium to society, but democracy accepts all religions, and here political parties here adhere to one religion or the other, as many pundits would agree that, many successful democracies support one religion or the other.
But 'saffron' block is also not democratic. They are virtually fascist. Hence the comparison.
'Saffron Block' is only a psycho state or mentality of so called pseudo secular which does not and cannot exist in our country having such an over friendly atmosphere.
You need to go only through 'Bunch of thoughts' and 'we- our nationhood defined' by Guru Golwalkar and thoughts and practices of Sangh Pariar to know their fascist character. Being communal and knowing that 'secularism' is in our constitution, they coined a phrase 'pseudo secular' to describe others and claim 'secularism' for their own brand of 'aggressive Hindutva' . Recently, Modi claimed himself as 'Hindu nationalist' . Demolition of historic mosque and deliberate riots in Gujarat amply establish their fascism.
Topic Author
G
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani
@gkajmani
Topic Stats
Created
Monday, 19 August 2013 06:31
Last Updated
Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies
0
Views
1.7K
Likes
0