Why had they faces covered?

2.2K Views
0 Replies
1 min read
When Sreeshant, Ajit Chandila and Ankeet Chavan were arrested, they had been brought as normal criminals with their faces covered. I didn't understand why. After all, their entire porfiles and lots of photos are all over the cricketing sites. It's not that their facial identity is unknown.........

20 Replies

I think that was just a formality by these three players to show the world that they are really ashamed of their doings.
I think that was just a formality by these three players to show the world that they are really ashamed of their doings.

But I don't think they wore it on their own. There might have certainly been guidelines from the police officials to take them in that way.
Probably they did not want to show you their smiles that the judiciary has no law against the and they will be set free soon, maybe a ban of few years but money is already in their pockets. I have seen many episodes before.
Probably they did not want to show you their smiles that the judiciary has no law against the and they will be set free soon, maybe a ban of few years but money is already in their pockets. I have seen many episodes before.

I think they should also be stripped off their money apart from banning them for life. I don't think any lesser punishment will be sufficient.
When Sreeshant, Ajit Chandila and Ankeet Chavan were arrested, they had been brought as normal criminals with their faces covered. I didn't understand why. After all, their entire porfiles and lots of photos are all over the cricketing sites. It's not that their facial identity is unknown.........


because they could not face public so they covered their face.
When Sreeshant, Ajit Chandila and Ankeet Chavan were arrested, they had been brought as normal criminals with their faces covered. I didn't understand why. After all, their entire porfiles and lots of photos are all over the cricketing sites. It's not that their facial identity is unknown.........


because they could not face public so they covered their face.

Oh yes, they could not face the people around as they were facing the music..........
I think that was just a formality by these three players to show the world that they are really ashamed of their doings.

But I don't think they wore it on their own. There might have certainly been guidelines from the police officials to take them in that way.


This is correct. Covering faces of accused is police procedure.
I think that was just a formality by these three players to show the world that they are really ashamed of their doings.

But I don't think they wore it on their own. There might have certainly been guidelines from the police officials to take them in that way.


This is correct. Covering faces of accused is police procedure.

But in that case, I don't see any reason why their faces should be covered. Was Sanjay Dutt's face covered when he had comparatively been involved in more serious crimes?
I think that was just a formality by these three players to show the world that they are really ashamed of their doings.

But I don't think they wore it on their own. There might have certainly been guidelines from the police officials to take them in that way.


This is correct. Covering faces of accused is police procedure.

But in that case, I don't see any reason why their faces should be covered. Was Sanjay Dutt's face covered when he had comparatively been involved in more serious crimes?


The face covered according to police procedure. Law and order is a state subject and so there is possibility of different rules in various states.
I think that the procedure of covering faces of the accused while they are being taken in custody handcuffed is for their security. It is possible to create confusion about the accused's identity to public since there is always a danger of the accused being attacked by self-proclaimed vigilantes!

Well, another reasoning that they are ashamed to face people might also be right!
Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.
Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.

But practically speaking, in this case, whose identity are they trying to close anyways?
Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.

But practically speaking, in this case, whose identity are they trying to close anyways?


They are bound to keep going as per instructions, we know about people but we cannot photograph them while police carrying them after arresting.
Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.


If so, not covering face of Sanjay Dutt is well explained. Sanjay Dutt is not an accused but a convict and hence his identity need not be hidden. On the other hand, the Cricket players are being investigated and they are not yet convicts. so their face needs be covered.
Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.


If so, not covering face of Sanjay Dutt is well explained. Sanjay Dutt is not an accused but a convict and hence his identity need not be hidden. On the other hand, the Cricket players are being investigated and they are not yet convicts. so their face needs be covered.


That's true, once convicted the faces are not covered because the stage of identity parade is over by then.
Because they cant face the people...or might be it a police procedure....
Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.


If so, not covering face of Sanjay Dutt is well explained. Sanjay Dutt is not an accused but a convict and hence his identity need not be hidden. On the other hand, the Cricket players are being investigated and they are not yet convicts. so their face needs be covered.


That's true, once convicted the faces are not covered because the stage of identity parade is over by then.

That may be true what you said. But don't you think in this case it was just a formality, as if no one knew their faces......or who they were....... :woohoo: :woohoo:
Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.


If so, not covering face of Sanjay Dutt is well explained. Sanjay Dutt is not an accused but a convict and hence his identity need not be hidden. On the other hand, the Cricket players are being investigated and they are not yet convicts. so their face needs be covered.


That's true, once convicted the faces are not covered because the stage of identity parade is over by then.

That may be true what you said. But don't you think in this case it was just a formality, as if no one knew their faces......or who they were....... :woohoo: :woohoo:


Probably a case of false shame and outraged dignity!!! :evil: :laugh:
Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.


If so, not covering face of Sanjay Dutt is well explained. Sanjay Dutt is not an accused but a convict and hence his identity need not be hidden. On the other hand, the Cricket players are being investigated and they are not yet convicts. so their face needs be covered.


That's true, once convicted the faces are not covered because the stage of identity parade is over by then.

That may be true what you said. But don't you think in this case it was just a formality, as if no one knew their faces......or who they were....... :woohoo: :woohoo:


Probably a case of false shame and outraged dignity!!! :evil: :laugh:

Yes, that looks rather practical answer. But they could have come out shamelessly like that, I am sure, hadn't their faces been covered.
Covering face is one of the procedure of court.
After investigation, If the person found innocent, He released cleanly.

I think, Sreesanth is guilty and crying with covering his face. :laugh: :laugh:

Topic Author

Topic Stats

Created Friday, 17 May 2013 14:46
Last Updated Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies 0
Views 2.2K
Likes 0

Share This Topic