Digvijay singh is aggrieved in belittling statutory authorities including CBI dubbed as 'caged parrot'. Can we not avoid such language.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Digvijaya-Singh-attacks-judiciary-for-calling-CBI-a-caged-parrot/articleshow/20027666.cms
20 Replies
Digvijay singh is aggrieved in belittling statutory authorities including CBI dubbed as 'caged parrot'. Can we not avoid such language.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Digvijaya-Singh-attacks-judiciary-for-calling-CBI-a-caged-parrot/articleshow/20027666.cms
Digvijay is also pet parrot of congress. No doubt in it that every government use CBI for their political purpose.
In a way, all spokespersons are parrots. They will speak only what their organization wants. Use of words like 'parrot' for those working in a subordinate or representative position is in bad taste and inappropriate.
Our leaders set an example for using inappropriate words ( Most of the leaders are in the same class ). You should hear the indecent language used by Telengana and Andhra leaders.
It appears that the leaders have poor impression of the audience. They believe that the audience will not understand decent language. A leader will speak in a decent manner in Chamber of commerce meeting. But he will be indecent in a rural crowd meeting.
Digvijay singh is aggrieved in belittling statutory authorities including CBI dubbed as 'caged parrot'. Can we not avoid such language.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Digvijaya-Singh-attacks-judiciary-for-calling-CBI-a-caged-parrot/articleshow/20027666.cms
Digvijay is also pet parrot of congress. No doubt in it that every government use CBI for their political purpose.
In a way, all spokespersons are parrots. They will speak only what their organization wants. Use of words like 'parrot' for those working in a subordinate or representative position is in bad taste and inappropriate.
Our leaders set an example for using inappropriate words ( Most of the leaders are in the same class ). You should hear the indecent language used by Telengana and Andhra leaders.
It appears that the leaders have poor impression of the audience. They believe that the audience will not understand decent language. A leader will speak in a decent manner in Chamber of commerce meeting. But he will be indecent in a rural crowd meeting.
Not in the rural crowd meetings, in the very venerable place like Assembly, where Mahatma's photo was hanging. He must be moving restlessly in his grave.
Digvijay singh is aggrieved in belittling statutory authorities including CBI dubbed as 'caged parrot'. Can we not avoid such language.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Digvijaya-Singh-attacks-judiciary-for-calling-CBI-a-caged-parrot/articleshow/20027666.cms
Digvijay is also pet parrot of congress. No doubt in it that every government use CBI for their political purpose.
In a way, all spokespersons are parrots. They will speak only what their organization wants. Use of words like 'parrot' for those working in a subordinate or representative position is in bad taste and inappropriate.
Our leaders set an example for using inappropriate words ( Most of the leaders are in the same class ). You should hear the indecent language used by Telengana and Andhra leaders.
It appears that the leaders have poor impression of the audience. They believe that the audience will not understand decent language. A leader will speak in a decent manner in Chamber of commerce meeting. But he will be indecent in a rural crowd meeting.
Not in the rural crowd meetings, in the very venerable place like Assembly, where Mahatma's photo was hanging. He must be moving restlessly in his grave.
And they claim to speak language of the masses. If you listen some of the great leaders of this country you will feel ashamed the way they speak particularly while referring other party leaders.
Digvijay singh is aggrieved in belittling statutory authorities including CBI dubbed as 'caged parrot'. Can we not avoid such language.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Digvijaya-Singh-attacks-judiciary-for-calling-CBI-a-caged-parrot/articleshow/20027666.cms
Digvijay is also pet parrot of congress. No doubt in it that every government use CBI for their political purpose.
In a way, all spokespersons are parrots. They will speak only what their organization wants. Use of words like 'parrot' for those working in a subordinate or representative position is in bad taste and inappropriate.
Our leaders set an example for using inappropriate words ( Most of the leaders are in the same class ). You should hear the indecent language used by Telengana and Andhra leaders.
It appears that the leaders have poor impression of the audience. They believe that the audience will not understand decent language. A leader will speak in a decent manner in Chamber of commerce meeting. But he will be indecent in a rural crowd meeting.
Not in the rural crowd meetings, in the very venerable place like Assembly, where Mahatma's photo was hanging. He must be moving restlessly in his grave.
And they claim to speak language of the masses. If you listen some of the great leaders of this country you will feel ashamed the way they speak particularly while referring other party leaders.
They show chappals at each other. Masses also are better than these politicos.
Government have filed an affidavit before supreme court intimating ways and means that wil ensure functional autonomy to C.B.I.
Once again CBI proved that he is parrot of government. Ex railway minister Bansal name in excluded in chargesheet which CBI submitt before court. A foolish most person know that such big deal is possible with consent of head of department.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Centre-files-affidavit-on-CBI-autonomy-in-SC/Article1-1086367.aspx
Government have filed an affidavit before supreme court intimating ways and means that wil ensure functional autonomy to C.B.I.
Once again CBI proved that he is parrot of government. Ex railway minister Bansal name in excluded in chargesheet which CBI submitt before court. A foolish most person know that such big deal is possible with consent of head of department.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Centre-files-affidavit-on-CBI-autonomy-in-SC/Article1-1086367.aspx
We need to know the extent of authority vested in officers. It is possible that officers subordinate to ministers had full authority in the matter and so could act independently even without knowledge of minister.
Government have filed an affidavit before supreme court intimating ways and means that wil ensure functional autonomy to C.B.I.
Once again CBI proved that he is parrot of government. Ex railway minister Bansal name in excluded in chargesheet which CBI submitt before court. A foolish most person know that such big deal is possible with consent of head of department.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Centre-files-affidavit-on-CBI-autonomy-in-SC/Article1-1086367.aspx
We need to know the extent of authority vested in officers. It is possible that officers subordinate to ministers had full authority in the matter and so could act independently even without knowledge of minister.
In a case of this nature, where the officer has shown over enthusiasm and cleared a file without the knowledge of the concerned minister, the opposition in the assembly made the minister apologize. The minister in turn transferred the concerned officer. It happened in AP.
Government have filed an affidavit before supreme court intimating ways and means that wil ensure functional autonomy to C.B.I.
Once again CBI proved that he is parrot of government. Ex railway minister Bansal name in excluded in chargesheet which CBI submitt before court. A foolish most person know that such big deal is possible with consent of head of department.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Centre-files-affidavit-on-CBI-autonomy-in-SC/Article1-1086367.aspx
We need to know the extent of authority vested in officers. It is possible that officers subordinate to ministers had full authority in the matter and so could act independently even without knowledge of minister.
It is beginning, we must be wait for some time.
Government have submitted before supreme Court that CBI should not be given free hand. Utiamtely government has to regulate the organization.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/giving-free-hand-to-cbi-wont-be-in-interest-of-justice/1152231/
Oh yes, every one should act as per government, no department/person is bigger than government therefore should act as per official line.
Government have submitted before supreme Court that CBI should not be given free hand. Utiamtely government has to regulate the organization.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/giving-free-hand-to-cbi-wont-be-in-interest-of-justice/1152231/
This is how the CBI is functioning now. Opposition parties often describe it as Congress Bureau of Investigation.
Digvijay singh is aggrieved in belittling statutory authorities including CBI dubbed as 'caged parrot'. Can we not avoid such language.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Digvijaya-Singh-attacks-judiciary-for-calling-CBI-a-caged-parrot/articleshow/20027666.cms
Supreme court said what he feel. I thing noting is wrong in it. Digvijy have only one agenda,, keeping madam happy.
LOL you have summed him up right and proper ! That seems to be the only agenda for all congressmen ! :cheer:
Yes bread and butter of congress people depends on it.
Digvijay singh is aggrieved in belittling statutory authorities including CBI dubbed as 'caged parrot'. Can we not avoid such language.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Digvijaya-Singh-attacks-judiciary-for-calling-CBI-a-caged-parrot/articleshow/20027666.cms
Supreme court said what he feel. I thing noting is wrong in it. Digvijy have only one agenda,, keeping madam happy.
LOL you have summed him up right and proper ! That seems to be the only agenda for all congressmen ! :cheer:
Yes bread and butter of congress people depends on it.
It's a known fact that Congress uses CBI as a tool to suppress and stifle the throats of any who oppose its views.
Digvijay singh is aggrieved in belittling statutory authorities including CBI dubbed as 'caged parrot'. Can we not avoid such language.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Digvijaya-Singh-attacks-judiciary-for-calling-CBI-a-caged-parrot/articleshow/20027666.cms
Supreme court said what he feel. I thing noting is wrong in it. Digvijy have only one agenda,, keeping madam happy.
LOL you have summed him up right and proper ! That seems to be the only agenda for all congressmen ! :cheer:
Yes bread and butter of congress people depends on it.
It's a known fact that Congress uses CBI as a tool to suppress and stifle the throats of any who oppose its views.
Why accuse congress only, every government did the same. Maya and Mulayam were not supporting present government if it was not for CBI. Others also used CBI for their own benefit from time to time.
Digvijay singh is aggrieved in belittling statutory authorities including CBI dubbed as 'caged parrot'. Can we not avoid such language.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Digvijaya-Singh-attacks-judiciary-for-calling-CBI-a-caged-parrot/articleshow/20027666.cms
Supreme court said what he feel. I thing noting is wrong in it. Digvijy have only one agenda,, keeping madam happy.
LOL you have summed him up right and proper ! That seems to be the only agenda for all congressmen ! :cheer:
Yes bread and butter of congress people depends on it.
It's a known fact that Congress uses CBI as a tool to suppress and stifle the throats of any who oppose its views.
Why accuse congress only, every government did the same. Maya and Mulayam were not supporting present government if it was not for CBI. Others also used CBI for their own benefit from time to time.
You are right. I should have said 'any ruling party.'
In a way I feel that CBI would find it impossible to function without consulting or taking cues from the ruling parties since the absolute power is in their hands. Even the supreme court can only do so much....I wish we had a better and more transparent system of governance ..
CBI cannot be absolutely independent. But there should not be intervention by political parties. CBI has to coordinate with other ministries particularly Home and Law.
In a way I feel that CBI would find it impossible to function without consulting or taking cues from the ruling parties since the absolute power is in their hands. Even the supreme court can only do so much....I wish we had a better and more transparent system of governance ..
CBI cannot be absolutely independent. But there should not be intervention by political parties. CBI has to coordinate with other ministries particularly Home and Law.
True. But unfortunately political intervention has become rampant. It's to be noted that politicians belonging to ruling party are equally intervening. And this is the reason for its unpopularity.
In a way I feel that CBI would find it impossible to function without consulting or taking cues from the ruling parties since the absolute power is in their hands. Even the supreme court can only do so much....I wish we had a better and more transparent system of governance ..
CBI cannot be absolutely independent. But there should not be intervention by political parties. CBI has to coordinate with other ministries particularly Home and Law.
True. But unfortunately political intervention has become rampant. It's to be noted that politicians belonging to ruling party are equally intervening. And this is the reason for its unpopularity.[/quote
The intervention is only from top level. Street level politicians cannot interfere as they do in districts under state government.
Topic Author
G
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani
@gkajmani
Topic Stats
Created
Monday, 13 May 2013 10:52
Last Updated
Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies
0
Views
2K
Likes
0