In eighties, Bhindrawale was much in news for his anti Hindu stance. Many were killed by him. He was, in fact, a congress product. He proved Frankenstein monster that led to assassination of Indira Gandhi.
Now Congress has another product to counter BJP and Shiva Sena. This is MNS leader Raj Thakre. .He is up in arms against Hindi speaking regions, Hindi news channels and his mother organization shiva Sena leader Udhav Thakre seeks permits for Biharis entering Mumbai.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/furore-over-raj-thackeray-s-hate-speech--case-filed-against-him.html
7 Replies
In eighties, Bhindrawale was much in news for his anti Hindu stance. Many were killed by him. He was, in fact, a congress product. He proved Frankenstein monster that led to assassination of Indira Gandhi.
Now Congress has another product to counter BJP and Shiva Sena. This is MNS leader Raj Thakre. .He is up in arms against Hindi speaking regions, Hindi news channels and his mother organization shiva Sena leader Udhav Thakre seeks permits for Biharis entering Mumbai.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/furore-over-raj-thackeray-s-hate-speech--case-filed-against-him.html
I won't compare him with Bhindrawala but he is doing all this to gain political ground. Congress is keeping mum due to vote bank politics. That is common in every state, they come up with local sentiments.
In eighties, Bhindrawale was much in news for his anti Hindu stance. Many were killed by him. He was, in fact, a congress product. He proved Frankenstein monster that led to assassination of Indira Gandhi.
Now Congress has another product to counter BJP and Shiva Sena. This is MNS leader Raj Thakre. .He is up in arms against Hindi speaking regions, Hindi news channels and his mother organization shiva Sena leader Udhav Thakre seeks permits for Biharis entering Mumbai.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/furore-over-raj-thackeray-s-hate-speech--case-filed-against-him.html
I won't compare him with Bhindrawala but he is doing all this to gain political ground. Congress is keeping mum due to vote bank politics. That is common in every state, they come up with local sentiments.
Bhindrawale and Thakre are not identical. But there is a common thread. Both are narrow minded and sectarian. Bhindrawal was Khalistan supporters. The non Sikh were taken out of Vehicles and shot. The massacre of non Sikh minority community went on for several years. The end came only when there was violence against Sikhs after assassination of Indira Gandhi. Thakre is against all Non Maratha especially from U.P. and Bihar. He also threatens violence. Also Bhindrawale was used by Congress to counter Akali Dal. Thakre is being used by Congress to arrest the influence of BJP and Shiva Sena. To begin with Bhindrawale was also not so dangerous. He became so later. Raj Thakre also now appears less dangerous. But if unchecked, he may prove very dangerous to nation.
In eighties, Bhindrawale was much in news for his anti Hindu stance. Many were killed by him. He was, in fact, a congress product. He proved Frankenstein monster that led to assassination of Indira Gandhi.
Now Congress has another product to counter BJP and Shiva Sena. This is MNS leader Raj Thakre. .He is up in arms against Hindi speaking regions, Hindi news channels and his mother organization shiva Sena leader Udhav Thakre seeks permits for Biharis entering Mumbai.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/furore-over-raj-thackeray-s-hate-speech--case-filed-against-him.html
Shivsena policy has always been that - hate politics, it stated with Bal Thackery when he wanted all the Mangalore and Udipi restaurants owners to clear out in the seventies little realising the impact it would have on middle class working population.Later it was against anything that was known as westernisation and now of course his nephew and son are both following in his foot steps.The most disturbing factor is that they are gaining more public support within the state each day...
I sometimes wonder about the political theory. Why it is so confusing and difficult to understand? I don't think violence is necessary in politics.
Violence is unnecessary in a democratic system. We decide by ballot and not bullet. Many are impatient and attempt to settle disputes and self interest by coercion and violence.
Topic Author
G
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani
@gkajmani
Topic Stats
Created
Wednesday, 05 September 2012 10:11
Last Updated
Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies
0
Views
854
Likes
0