Everybodies should start some new interesting thread then it will be more interesting.
Gulshanji,Sandhya and sarale generally start some.
I am trying to do some.
Then what about the threads started my me and Ushaji most recently.
If people are not interested, why are those new threads getting more responses?
Should I give those links getting more responses?
Ceemji is absent nowadays...yet am trying my best to keep it active. Yet, if such responses we are getting, why should I start new ones????
Those who find it less interesting can find new topics....after all it's not an assigned job to me, Gulshanji, Usha or a few members here :angry:
I agree that this is not responsibility of a few individuals only. all members need contribute to their best. There is also possibility of some posts being superfluous or repetitive. My suggestion is that there should be a ceiling of fifty posts for a thread. No member may give more than three posts and these should also not be repetitive. If he still feels that he missed some important point, he may add by inserting in some existing post by suitably editing.
Alternatively, there should be a time limit on a thread after which this must be locked. One week for a thread would suffice. The best response in a thread should get ten points instead of usual five.
I also request for correcting the word 'Forms' to 'Forum'.
Yes, I agree to lock a particular thread if answers are just repetition and nothing new can be added. But locking within 1 or 2 weeks.......not sure enough :unsure: :unsure: :unsure:
If so, same threads may be started next month too by some another person. Again repetitive responses will occur :whistle: :whistle:
"
The best response in a thread should get ten points instead of usual five."
It's an unnoticed suggestion Sir, we have discussed it many times before without reaching a conclusion.