Additional cash credits

2.1K Views
0 Replies
1 min read
In most months revenue share list some one sees to be crossed the minimum point limit twice.Why don't they give one more share of revenue or some percentage additionally according to the points earned?

14 Replies

I also agree.The present system of giving an even share overlooking the actual points scored, is highly irrational and unjust to a hardworking member.
It is a good idea.But it will decrease the share of others in the list.A % suggestion is good.
Did you mean, share the money according to the points earned? Idea is good but I am not sure how the members will respond to such things as only few people can go beyond such levels and they will get the maximum
well it is a point of thinking but they most of the members who are above that level are already getting shortlisted in daily voting and comments list more often so I think single share is a good option.
It is just a suggestion, think about it.
Hi Maverick!

If the share of revenue is linked to the actual points scored by the members it might lead to a decline in the share of members who figure down the list but the measure would be perfectly logical and introduce an element of healthy competition.More and more members would stay active.
Maverick,
I meant just this - those who had 5000 or more points just give 2 shares of the revenue.If it crosses 10000 points he is a hard earner and give him 10% of his share of that month extra.
There is a parallel discussion going on this topic?
http://www.boddunan.com/forums/11-general-discussions/22006-are-we-going-to-have-big-revenue-share-per-user.html?limit=15&start=45#22772
Its nice suggestion. revenue share should be distributed as per point basis not equal amount to all eligible members. I think its not fare.
@Abid

I like your suggestion.A formula like that can be worked out and fine-tuned towards this purpose.
well it is a point of thinking but they most of the members who are above that level are already getting shortlisted in daily voting and comments list more often so I think single share is a good option.
It is just a suggestion, think about it.
I had a modification to this suggestion.The high point earners can be given one more share if the actual share holders goes below 20 per month.So more or less will be the same effect.
anbuL wrote:
[quote]I had a modification to this suggestion.The high point earners can be given one more share if the actual share holders goes below 20 per month.So more or less will be the same effect.[/quote]

It is also a good suggestion.
Abid Areacode wrote:
[quote]anbuL wrote:
[quote]I had a modification to this suggestion.The high point earners can be given one more share if the actual share holders goes below 20 per month.So more or less will be the same effect.[/quote]

It is also a good suggestion.[/quote]


Thanks for your acceptance

Topic Author

A

Abid Areacode

@Abid Areacode

Topic Stats

Created Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:13
Last Updated Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies 0
Views 2.1K
Likes 0

Share This Topic