20 Replies

Homeopathy is not so worthless but is a time consumed and take long time to cure a patience and it is very good as from my point of view.
Homeopathy is not so worthless but is a time consumed and take long time to cure a patience and it is very good as from my point of view.

yes, of course.
Homeopathy has no side effects, similar to Ayurveda.
Also, young kids will take that medicine easily
Yes if it takes in a regular basis then it will destroy the illness perfectly.There are lots of expert in that field.
As in our lifes, everything depends on the time. So homeopathy also takes time to show its effect for best result.
Some diseases have best treatment in homeopathy. I think so.

I think Sheetal Kamble is a Homeo doctor
Homeopathy is a recognized medical system. The expert may be a competitor to this system. The Government of India, Ministry of Health recognizes this system apart from several others. Hence, the statement is unacceptable.
Homeopathy is a recognized medical system. The expert may be a competitor to this system. The Government of India, Ministry of Health recognizes this system apart from several others. Hence, the statement is unacceptable.


Yes I also totally agree with you :)
Homeopathy is not worthless..
It is a myth that homeopathy takes a very long time..but it is wrong.
It takes a long time to cure the disease in patients who has been taking the allopathy medicines for years together..but if you don't supress your symptoms by allopathy for longer time then homeopathy cures it immediately.
EX- If a patient of skin disease taking steroidal treatment and other allopathic treatment for 20years , then yes homeopathy will take longer time to cure such patient. But if same person starts the treatment immediately after the symptoms arise then homeopathy provides result immediately as the skin disease is not suppressed by steroidal treatment.

But in todays era most of the people first go for the allopathic treatment and after yrs of treatment when they r not better they try homeopathy and thats why homeopathy takes longer time.
Homeopathy is not worthless..
It is a myth that homeopathy takes a very long time..but it is wrong.
It takes a long time to cure the disease in patients who has been taking the allopathy medicines for years together..but if you don't supress your symptoms by allopathy for longer time then homeopathy cures it immediately.
EX- If a patient of skin disease taking steroidal treatment and other allopathic treatment for 20years , then yes homeopathy will take longer time to cure such patient. But if same person starts the treatment immediately after the symptoms arise then homeopathy provides result immediately as the skin disease is not suppressed by steroidal treatment.

But in todays era most of the people first go for the allopathic treatment and after yrs of treatment when they r not better they try homeopathy and thats why homeopathy takes longer time.


Really a nice piece of information shared by a homeopathy doctor. Yes, what you told is absolutely correct. The best advantage of homeopathy is less side effects. So, for mild diseases, it is better to consult a homeopathy doctor first. But we people, won't do it
I don't think it is worthless.. It is like it takes more time for curing.. From my relative one of got cured form his gallblader problem completely.. So i think it works.
I started this thread about to know Homeopathy and nice explanation.
I started this thread about to know Homeopathy and nice explanation.


Sheetal may beat you. She is a homeo doctor. Take care chettaa :P :P :P :laugh:
If Sheetal beat me then she has to treat me also after all she is a doctor.
Homeopathy is good for skin related problems and small symptoms its remove thing permanently.
My sister is homeopathy Doctor and she tells that homeopathy medicines are very good and you gets cure easily.
I think Sheetal has explained it very well. But people just expect relief immedietely whatever may be the reason or severity of problem. I myself tried homepathy treatment for curing typhoid. Though I can use allopathy to cure it in 2 days there is very chances of curing it completely and the side effects are numerous as I felt dizzy and breathless at nights, when i went for it.
With homepathy though I got relief from side effect there are lots of limitations in eating food while taking the medicine, which made me anemic and my hemoglobin count went to 4. I had to again take IRON supplement through allopathy medicine for improving it..
I think both have merits and demerits, it's not wise to say that homepathy is completely worthless.
I think Sheetal has explained it very well. But people just expect relief immedietely whatever may be the reason or severity of problem. I myself tried homepathy treatment for curing typhoid. Though I can use allopathy to cure it in 2 days there is very chances of curing it completely and the side effects are numerous as I felt dizzy and breathless at nights, when i went for it.
With homepathy though I got relief from side effect there are lots of limitations in eating food while taking the medicine, which made me anemic and my hemoglobin count went to 4. I had to again take IRON supplement through allopathy medicine for improving it..
I think both have merits and demerits, it's not wise to say that homepathy is completely worthless.


From where can I catch you....you are flying from one branch to another in a fraction of seconds :angry:
@ Rajani,

Yes sometimes homeopathy has limitations like if a person is suffering from multiple chronic problem it becomes difficult to treat all of them, as some problem may increase during the course of treatment. And with respect to diet restriction, it all depends on Homeopath. But I dont think so strict diet is required that the hemoglobin goes down to 4. I guess the reason for anemia must be something else. Usually i dont prefer very strict diet during the treatment. Ultimately it depends n the homeopath who is treating you.
Hope you feel well soon.
I think Sheetal has explained it very well. But people just expect relief immedietely whatever may be the reason or severity of problem. I myself tried homepathy treatment for curing typhoid. Though I can use allopathy to cure it in 2 days there is very chances of curing it completely and the side effects are numerous as I felt dizzy and breathless at nights, when i went for it.
With homepathy though I got relief from side effect there are lots of limitations in eating food while taking the medicine, which made me anemic and my hemoglobin count went to 4. I had to again take IRON supplement through allopathy medicine for improving it..
I think both have merits and demerits, it's not wise to say that homepathy is completely worthless.


From where can I catch you....you are flying from one branch to another in a fraction of seconds :angry:


Sorry Sandha, you have to catch me somehow..because I only don't know when I will come and go..
{CJATTACHMENT ["id": 6290]}
Homeopathy is also a low costly treatment than alapathy so it is very helpful to poor. And one more thing it takes some time but cures completely.
Am I right Sheetal?

Topic Author

Topic Stats

Created Monday, 19 March 2012 13:12
Last Updated Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies 0
Views 1.7K
Likes 0

Share This Topic