Dalao Lama urges restraint by inmates of a monestry in Tibet.
It is not understood what Dalai Lama gains by hostile attitude towards china. The staus of government in exile cannot go on for ever. It will be best for Dalai Lama to disband his government in exile, that is purposeless and instead reconcile with Tibetan status as province of China. Tibet can well flourish within framework of Chinese administration.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/dalai-lama-urges-restraint-tibet-monastery-standoff-20110415-225603-364.html
4 Replies
Dalao Lama urges restraint by inmates of a monestry in Tibet.
It is not understood what Dalai Lama gains by hostile attitude towards china. The staus of government in exile cannot go on for ever. It will be best for Dalai Lama to disband his government in exile, that is purposeless and instead reconcile with Tibetan status as province of China. Tibet can well flourish within framework of Chinese administration.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/dalai-lama-urges-restraint-tibet-monastery-standoff-20110415-225603-364.html
The government in exile cannot achieve anyyhing on its own. The Dalai Lama should realize soon.
Dalao Lama urges restraint by inmates of a monestry in Tibet.
It is not understood what Dalai Lama gains by hostile attitude towards china. The staus of government in exile cannot go on for ever. It will be best for Dalai Lama to disband his government in exile, that is purposeless and instead reconcile with Tibetan status as province of China. Tibet can well flourish within framework of Chinese administration.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/dalai-lama-urges-restraint-tibet-monastery-standoff-20110415-225603-364.html
There are serious doubts whether Chinese occupation is really lawful and Tibet was an independent state until 1949 when China imposed its presence there..
http://www.freetibet.org/about/legal-status-tibet#.UJInncWIOIU
In International politics, pragmatism matters most. It is no use going in history too much. China is in actual occupation of Tibet for more than a half century and the world recognizes Chinese sovereignty. It is no use harping on what the situation was before 1949.
Isn't that similar to what happened to India when the Mughals and later the British came to rule India for almost 2 centuries? How does their plight make it any different to what it was for us Indians?
Topic Author
G
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani
@gkajmani
Topic Stats
Created
Sunday, 17 April 2011 10:01
Last Updated
Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies
0
Views
777
Likes
0