Ask all your Doubts here.

Presently, five can be edited. But sometimes, after only one or two articles or even after not editing even one article, the message of exhausting the limit appears. But this is no cause of worry. This is settled by communication with administration.

In fact it may be a better idea to reduce the number of articles per day to 2 or 3.practically speaking if each active member submits 5 articles per day , with even 10 active members that would add up to 50 articles a day and with 2 or 3 editors being active they would probably need the entire day to edit 16 odd articles each day...so I feel that along with the other positive changes that are taking place here the number of articles/per day too should be reduced so that the system does not get clogged...

In fact it may be a better idea to reduce the number of articles per day to 2 or 3.practically speaking if each active member submits 5 articles per day , with even 10 active members that would add up to 50 articles a day and with 2 or 3 editors being active they would probably need the entire day to edit 16 odd articles each day...so I feel that along with the other positive changes that are taking place here the number of articles/per day too should be reduced so that the system does not get clogged...

i don't think it is a practical idea.
many writers are here who write 4 or 5 short articles when they get time.
we are granted with the right of writing 5 articles a day. why should we lose it? :huh:

it is better to add a few more editors, at least 2 :)
it will lessen the stress of present editor team, particularly during contests

Presently, five can be edited. But sometimes, after only one or two articles or even after not editing even one article, the message of exhausting the limit appears. But this is no cause of worry. This is settled by communication with administration.

i think, time is calculated from 11.30 am to next day 11.30 am. Gulshanji, have you checked it?

Presently, five can be edited. But sometimes, after only one or two articles or even after not editing even one article, the message of exhausting the limit appears. But this is no cause of worry. This is settled by communication with administration.

i think, time is calculated from 11.30 am to next day 11.30 am. Gulshanji, have you checked it?

I know this but I'm more bothered about completing the task. When there is warning that maximum articles have been edited, I switch to other jobs.

are boddunan editors on strike for the past three days :P
6 articles on my behalf, waiting for your compilation :cheer: :cheer: :laugh: :laugh:

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: no they are in hungry of league.

while editors have to modify the same articles 3 times every time their quota exhausts faster than it should. :laugh: :laugh:

I feel that the system should ensure that all articles are edited or rejected within three days. The quota per editor should be flexible. If there are more articles, an editor has to edit more. If the articles are less, his quota will be less. To elucidate, if one hundred articles are pending for edit, the quota will be more than when there are only twenty articles for editing.

Agree with you. I will try to improve the quota system for editors.

@suni, I do not understand. The system will check the number of articles you had reviewed, not the number of edits you did.

are boddunan editors on strike for the past three days :P
6 articles on my behalf, waiting for your compilation :cheer: :cheer: :laugh: :laugh:

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: no they are in hungry of league.

while editors have to modify the same articles 3 times every time their quota exhausts faster than it should. :laugh: :laugh:

I feel that the system should ensure that all articles are edited or rejected within three days. The quota per editor should be flexible. If there are more articles, an editor has to edit more. If the articles are less, his quota will be less. To elucidate, if one hundred articles are pending for edit, the quota will be more when there are only twenty articles for editing.

Agree with you. I will try to improve the quota system for editors.

@suni, I do not understand. The system will check the number of articles you had reviewed, not the number of edits you did.

This was not for you but sasi- nothing to worry, I am getting my quota and doing my job. Thanks.

In fact it may be a better idea to reduce the number of articles per day to 2 or 3.practically speaking if each active member submits 5 articles per day , with even 10 active members that would add up to 50 articles a day and with 2 or 3 editors being active they would probably need the entire day to edit 16 odd articles each day...so I feel that along with the other positive changes that are taking place here the number of articles/per day too should be reduced so that the system does not get clogged...

i don't think it is a practical idea.
many writers are here who write 4 or 5 short articles when they get time.
we are granted with the right of writing 5 articles a day. why should we lose it? :huh:

it is better to add a few more editors, at least 2 :)
it will lessen the stress of present editor team, particularly during contests

Sandhyaji. The editors are not stressed. The only thing is that they need to give priority to editing and checking spam and undesirable comment rather than writing their own articles and participating in forums. The very fact that the editors and moderators find time to write their own articles and posts goes to prove that they are not stressed.

The number of articles as shown on my profile page is 48 whereas I have a total of 56 articles including the 3 that is pending ...will this get updated in time and is there anyone else who is facing a similar situation...

In fact it may be a better idea to reduce the number of articles per day to 2 or 3.practically speaking if each active member submits 5 articles per day , with even 10 active members that would add up to 50 articles a day and with 2 or 3 editors being active they would probably need the entire day to edit 16 odd articles each day...so I feel that along with the other positive changes that are taking place here the number of articles/per day too should be reduced so that the system does not get clogged...

i don't think it is a practical idea.
many writers are here who write 4 or 5 short articles when they get time.
we are granted with the right of writing 5 articles a day. why should we lose it? :huh:

it is better to add a few more editors, at least 2 :)
it will lessen the stress of present editor team, particularly during contests

Sandhyaji. The editors are not stressed. The only thing is that they need to give priority to editing and checking spam and undesirable comment rather than writing their own articles and participating in forums. The very fact that the editors and moderators find time to write their own articles and posts goes to prove that they are not stressed.

please don't call me Sandhyaji, sirrrrr :( :( :P :P

The number of articles as shown on my profile page is 48 whereas I have a total of 56 articles including the 3 that is pending ...will this get updated in time and is there anyone else who is facing a similar situation...

yes, you are right.
171 articles published till now (not taking count of unpublished ones). but it's showing 154. :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
where have the rest gone :S :S

The number of articles as shown on my profile page is 48 whereas I have a total of 56 articles including the 3 that is pending ...will this get updated in time and is there anyone else who is facing a similar situation...

yes, you are right.
171 articles published till now (not taking count of unpublished ones). but it's showing 154. :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
where have the rest gone :S :S

As long as we have the list , I guess it is alright, it would probably get updated when all things are in place...

We are all sailing in the same boat so no worries, must be a technical fault in updating since the time it was installed ... :)

The number of articles as shown on my profile page is 48 whereas I have a total of 56 articles including the 3 that is pending ...will this get updated in time and is there anyone else who is facing a similar situation...

yes, you are right.
171 articles published till now (not taking count of unpublished ones). but it's showing 154. :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
where have the rest gone :S :S

As long as we have the list , I guess it is alright, it would probably get updated when all things are in place...

it happened in my case too. I didn't ask anybody with the hope, it will be rectified soon.

The number of articles as shown on my profile page is 48 whereas I have a total of 56 articles including the 3 that is pending ...will this get updated in time and is there anyone else who is facing a similar situation...

yes, you are right.
171 articles published till now (not taking count of unpublished ones). but it's showing 154. :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
where have the rest gone :S :S

As long as we have the list , I guess it is alright, it would probably get updated when all things are in place...

it happened in my case too. I didn't ask anybody with the hope, it will be rectified soon.

so, it is sure, number of articles of every member here is showing some errors...
once error is rectified Sarala may reach above 400 articles :woohoo: :woohoo:

Maverick, a question about the polls, I have submitted quite a few polls about 15 days back, will it take more time to approve and publish them??

The number of articles as shown on my profile page is 48 whereas I have a total of 56 articles including the 3 that is pending ...will this get updated in time and is there anyone else who is facing a similar situation...

yes, you are right.
171 articles published till now (not taking count of unpublished ones). but it's showing 154. :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
where have the rest gone :S :S

As long as we have the list , I guess it is alright, it would probably get updated when all things are in place...

We are all sailing in the same boat so no worries, must be a technical fault in updating since the time it was installed ... :)

Mine are spread over 9 pages even if we leave some of them which were resubmitted or rejected, I make it 10-15, my count would reach 175. Maybe the real figure would appear later.

i am noticing something strange in our article section from Sunday :whistle: :S :S

For example, a Telugu article in the front page published today. it is Sasi's article. within a few hours it was viewed by more than 400 people. most recently one article written by Sarala got more than 500 viewers within one or two hours. similarly, many articles found in 'most read articles' have seen a sudden jump in views.
is it some system error or do these articles getting these number of views?
Sarala and sasi, please don't feel bad. I just have a doubt if it is some system error or bug. hence asking so.

i am noticing something strange in our article section from Sunday :whistle: :S :S

For example, a Telugu article in the front page published today. it is Sasi's article. within a few hours it was viewed by more than 400 people. most recently one article written by Sarala got more than 500 viewers within one or two hours. similarly, many articles found in 'most read articles' have seen a sudden jump in views.
is it some system error or do these articles getting these number of views?
Sarala and sasi, please don't feel bad. I just have a doubt if it is some system error or bug. hence asking so.

Yes you are right...Saralas articles is older so no way of knowing , also Harsha's which also has 700 odd views , but Sasi's article getting 400 odd views within a couple of hours seems very strange...

i am noticing something strange in our article section from Sunday :whistle: :S :S

For example, a Telugu article in the front page published today. it is Sasi's article. within a few hours it was viewed by more than 400 people. most recently one article written by Sarala got more than 500 viewers within one or two hours. similarly, many articles found in 'most read articles' have seen a sudden jump in views.
is it some system error or do these articles getting these number of views?
Sarala and sasi, please don't feel bad. I just have a doubt if it is some system error or bug. hence asking so.

Yes you are right...Saralas articles is older so no way of knowing , also Harsha's which also has 700 odd views , but Sasi's article getting 400 odd views within a couple of hours seems very strange...

yes of course :silly: :silly:
i think it's some system error......tomorrow I may be surprised seeing my article in top 3, though it's published today :woohoo: :woohoo: :laugh: :laugh:
when Harsha's article was published, within 10 minutes it reached top 3 articles. so, i thought he might have shared its link with his friends in twitter and fb. but when the same thing is happening repeatedly, i feel admin should go through it.

i am noticing something strange in our article section from Sunday :whistle: :S :S

For example, a Telugu article in the front page published today. it is Sasi's article. within a few hours it was viewed by more than 400 people. most recently one article written by Sarala got more than 500 viewers within one or two hours. similarly, many articles found in 'most read articles' have seen a sudden jump in views.
is it some system error or do these articles getting these number of views?
Sarala and sasi, please don't feel bad. I just have a doubt if it is some system error or bug. hence asking so.

Yes you are right...Saralas articles is older so no way of knowing , also Harsha's which also has 700 odd views , but Sasi's article getting 400 odd views within a couple of hours seems very strange...

Yes, i too marked it