Gujrat emerging as a manufacturing hub..

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Where will the capital come from. Merely wishing potential is not enough it leads to overstaments.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Where will the capital come from. Merely wishing potential is not enough it leads to overstaments.

I'm from the coastal AP. Capital generation out of the existing resources is the job of the government. What i said is truth but bitter.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Where will the capital come from. Merely wishing potential is not enough it leads to overstaments.

I'm from the coastal AP. Capital generation out of the existing resources is the job of the government. What i said is truth but bitter.

The East India Company and British rule successfully made India capital deficit and this has left a big void in our surplus finances. Governments have limitations as notes cannot be printed - that would be disasterous and capital in form of FDI has to be selectively brought in so that it does not cause injury to local industry. It therefore is basically a slow and steady process. Prices will keep going up till economy attains equilibrium. One way to enrich the country is by increasing exports - but demand in other countries is not in our control.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Where will the capital come from. Merely wishing potential is not enough it leads to overstaments.

I'm from the coastal AP. Capital generation out of the existing resources is the job of the government. What i said is truth but bitter.

The East India Company and British rule successfully made India capital deficit and this has left a big void in our surplus finances. Governments have limitations as notes cannot be printed - that would be disasterous and capital in form of FDI has to be selectively brought in so that it does not cause injury to local industry. It therefore is basically a slow and steady process. Prices will keep going up till economy attains equilibrium. One way to enrich the country is by increasing exports - but demand in other countries is not in our control.

Boosting exports is on the top of theagenda in the new Governments Policy.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Where will the capital come from. Merely wishing potential is not enough it leads to overstaments.

I'm from the coastal AP. Capital generation out of the existing resources is the job of the government. What i said is truth but bitter.

The East India Company and British rule successfully made India capital deficit and this has left a big void in our surplus finances. Governments have limitations as notes cannot be printed - that would be disasterous and capital in form of FDI has to be selectively brought in so that it does not cause injury to local industry. It therefore is basically a slow and steady process. Prices will keep going up till economy attains equilibrium. One way to enrich the country is by increasing exports - but demand in other countries is not in our control.

Boosting exports is on the top of theagenda in the new Governments Policy.

It has been on the top of the agenda of all governments. Sun has not risen on May 16th.

Having a plethora of Resources is one thing and utilizing them to the core is another thing. Modi utilized what he has at his disposal. That made a whole difference. AP has a long shoreline. There is scope for developing Marine based industries. But the rulers' indifference left the resources Unutilized..

You miss the central point of my arguement. It is the availability of capital that makes commerce possible. AP and other states lacked capital infusion from an outside source which became possible in case of the then Bombay State in late 1880's. It helped create an industrial structure in Gujarat. The rest follows. Modi has marketed Gujarat skillfully.

No I didn't miss. I did not mention it because the capital availability and revenue resources of AP are well known.

Capital generated only within a country gets redistributed and overall sum remains same. But when capital comes from an outside system or country it makes the country wealthy. Perhaps before 1947 AP did not have access to wealth from foreign sources as Gujarat had. It was rich but not wealthy like Gujarat. And that is the difference. India is woefully short of capital today also.

It need not be prior to 1947. After 1947 we have rich resources capable of generating huge revenue through Marine and agricultural resources. They have a huge market in internationally. For example AP can cater to the needs of the entire world's Marine food and Mangoes.

Where will the capital come from. Merely wishing potential is not enough it leads to overstaments.

I'm from the coastal AP. Capital generation out of the existing resources is the job of the government. What i said is truth but bitter.

The East India Company and British rule successfully made India capital deficit and this has left a big void in our surplus finances. Governments have limitations as notes cannot be printed - that would be disasterous and capital in form of FDI has to be selectively brought in so that it does not cause injury to local industry. It therefore is basically a slow and steady process. Prices will keep going up till economy attains equilibrium. One way to enrich the country is by increasing exports - but demand in other countries is not in our control.

Boosting exports is on the top of theagenda in the new Governments Policy.

It has been on the top of the agenda of all governments. Sun has not risen on May 16th.

It will rise and fill India with a different sunlight.

Higher duty on imports also making situation nice as in the long run in house production will grow.

Gujrat has provided all the necessary infrastructure to the investing industrialists. In return the industries created job opportunities. The policies are industry friendly. Both the locals and investors are gainers.

I am from ODisha and one of my friend was working at Surat.
By seeing Television advertisement and promotional activities DOne by Mr.NArendra Modi. HE said that Modi closed thousands of small industries when give subsidy to big corporate and industries for which he loose his job.
So what type of development you say this?

I am from ODisha and one of my friend was working at Surat.
By seeing Television advertisement and promotional activities DOne by Mr.NArendra Modi. HE said that Modi closed thousands of small industries when give subsidy to big corporate and industries for which he loose his job.
So what type of development you say this?

Your friend must have lost the job because the small industry in wich he was employed was a sick industry. It would be helpful if you can say what the industry was.

Only minute percentages of people are seeing negative to this as most of them have seen the growth due to manufacturing increase there as it is the most highest job opportunity provider.

Gujrat Industrial model has become the role model for development.

Only minute percentages of people are seeing negative to this as most of them have seen the growth due to manufacturing increase there as it is the most highest job opportunity provider.

There will always be some opposition or negativity to any aspect more so when it is the opinion of an entire nation. But from what I have seen of Gujrat, Modi has taken care of even smaller sectors like handicrafts and village industries which have been given a helping hand..

Only minute percentages of people are seeing negative to this as most of them have seen the growth due to manufacturing increase there as it is the most highest job opportunity provider.

There will always be some opposition or negativity to any aspect more so when it is the opinion of an entire nation. But from what I have seen of Gujrat, Modi has taken care of even smaller sectors like handicrafts and village industries which have been given a helping hand..

Without an iota of doubt, Gujrat under the stewardship of Modi has emerged as a state worth emulating not only in the national level but in international level.

Only minute percentages of people are seeing negative to this as most of them have seen the growth due to manufacturing increase there as it is the most highest job opportunity provider.

There will always be some opposition or negativity to any aspect more so when it is the opinion of an entire nation. But from what I have seen of Gujrat, Modi has taken care of even smaller sectors like handicrafts and village industries which have been given a helping hand..

Without an iota of doubt, Gujrat under the stewardship of Modi has emerged as a state worth emulating not only in the national level but in international level.

The growth of Gujarat has been a continuous process even before 1947 and has continued irrespective of party in power. Ascribing it to only one man is not only unfair to others but also shows successful indoctrination.

Only minute percentages of people are seeing negative to this as most of them have seen the growth due to manufacturing increase there as it is the most highest job opportunity provider.

There will always be some opposition or negativity to any aspect more so when it is the opinion of an entire nation. But from what I have seen of Gujrat, Modi has taken care of even smaller sectors like handicrafts and village industries which have been given a helping hand..

Without an iota of doubt, Gujrat under the stewardship of Modi has emerged as a state worth emulating not only in the national level but in international level.

The growth of Gujarat has been a continuous process even before 1947 and has continued irrespective of party in power. Ascribing it to only one man is not only unfair to others but also shows successful indoctrination.

But enormous growth which attracts world wide requires peace and stability and after 1992 there is no disruption of peace there, and that is why growth and the then cm always want decisions to be taken readily.

Only minute percentages of people are seeing negative to this as most of them have seen the growth due to manufacturing increase there as it is the most highest job opportunity provider.

There will always be some opposition or negativity to any aspect more so when it is the opinion of an entire nation. But from what I have seen of Gujrat, Modi has taken care of even smaller sectors like handicrafts and village industries which have been given a helping hand..

Without an iota of doubt, Gujrat under the stewardship of Modi has emerged as a state worth emulating not only in the national level but in international level.

The growth of Gujarat has been a continuous process even before 1947 and has continued irrespective of party in power. Ascribing it to only one man is not only unfair to others but also shows successful indoctrination.

But enormous growth which attracts world wide requires peace and stability and after 1992 there is no disruption of peace there, and that is why growth and the then cm always want decisions to be taken readily.

With all said and done, it's the leadership that matters.