stapled visa for Arunachal Pradesh residents- goodwill gesture

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

Why should we imagine the things, when the proceedings of the meet are in inconclusive stage? Let's wait for the completion of the meeting.

Which meet is being referred to pl. Staple visa is an issue ongoing since a long time.

The present meet with the new external minister of Modi's government according to the link provided in the thread.

The issue has been not commented upon by the Indian side so far. The Chinese Minister said it is a goodwill gesture and flew off.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

Why should we imagine the things, when the proceedings of the meet are in inconclusive stage? Let's wait for the completion of the meeting.

Which meet is being referred to pl. Staple visa is an issue ongoing since a long time.

The present meet with the new external minister of Modi's government according to the link provided in the thread.

The issue has been not commented upon by the Indian side so far. The Chinese Minister said it is a goodwill gesture and flew off.[/quote

If you go through the link in the thread, you can see that India has not commented because the meet was inconclusive.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

India's considerations and Chinese considerations are poles apart.and lead to a stalemate . To solve this stalemate , both the countries should hold extensive dialogues in an amicable atmosphere. Until now nothing has come out. Let's see if the new government can resolve the stalemate and establish friendly relations mutually.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

Chinese cosider Arunachal Pradesh their part still they issue visas in a stapled manner.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

Chinese cosider Arunachal Pradesh their part still they issue visas in a stapled manner.

I sincerely wish that the two governments come to an amicable agreement

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

Chinese cosider Arunachal Pradesh their part still they issue visas in a stapled manner.

I sincerely wish that the two governments come to an amicable agreement

I just read that UAE had started issuing stapled visas to residents of Azad Kashmir in 2011.

An amicable settlement can only happen when either one gives up its claim or both give up their claims -- very difficult proposition at the moment.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

Chinese cosider Arunachal Pradesh their part still they issue visas in a stapled manner.

I sincerely wish that the two governments come to an amicable agreement

I just read that UAE had started issuing stapled visas to residents of Azad Kashmir in 2011.

An amicable settlement can only happen when either one gives up its claim or both give up their claims -- very difficult proposition at the moment.

In the absence of an amicable settlement there won't be peace in the SE Asia.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

Chinese cosider Arunachal Pradesh their part still they issue visas in a stapled manner.

I sincerely wish that the two governments come to an amicable agreement

I just read that UAE had started issuing stapled visas to residents of Azad Kashmir in 2011.

An amicable settlement can only happen when either one gives up its claim or both give up their claims -- very difficult proposition at the moment.

In the absence of an amicable settlement there won't be peace in the SE Asia.

Peace can be ensured either by surrender or by being mightier than your neighbours. SE Asia has almost always been in turmoil and shall continue to be as there are too many players involved from West Asia and Central Asia. We have to be strong militarily and economically.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

Chinese cosider Arunachal Pradesh their part still they issue visas in a stapled manner.

I sincerely wish that the two governments come to an amicable agreement

I just read that UAE had started issuing stapled visas to residents of Azad Kashmir in 2011.

An amicable settlement can only happen when either one gives up its claim or both give up their claims -- very difficult proposition at the moment.

In the absence of an amicable settlement there won't be peace in the SE Asia.

Peace can be ensured either by surrender or by being mightier than your neighbours. SE Asia has almost always been in turmoil and shall continue to be as there are too many players involved from West Asia and Central Asia. We have to be strong militarily and economically.

Keeping these key aspects in view ,the new government is thinking of taking measures to create a WIN-WIN situation where none is a loser nor a gainer.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

Chinese cosider Arunachal Pradesh their part still they issue visas in a stapled manner.

The Chinese give a visa on a separate paper that may be stapled to passport. The normal practice is to endorse VISA on passport itself. As they consider Arunacal Prades residents as their own citizens, they do not recognize Indian passport and so issue VISA o a separate paper. Similarly, India considers residents of Azad Kashmir as India citizens and so VISA cannot be endorsed on Pakistani passport held by them. What India does? A visa on a separete paper (to be stapled) or endotrsement o Pakistani passport. If te visa is endorsed on passport, this will be inconsistent with Indian stand that Azad Kashmir is de jure Indian territory. I just wanted answer for my curiousity.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

Chinese cosider Arunachal Pradesh their part still they issue visas in a stapled manner.

I sincerely wish that the two governments come to an amicable agreement

I just read that UAE had started issuing stapled visas to residents of Azad Kashmir in 2011.

An amicable settlement can only happen when either one gives up its claim or both give up their claims -- very difficult proposition at the moment.

In the absence of an amicable settlement there won't be peace in the SE Asia.

Peace can be ensured either by surrender or by being mightier than your neighbours. SE Asia has almost always been in turmoil and shall continue to be as there are too many players involved from West Asia and Central Asia. We have to be strong militarily and economically.

Keeping these key aspects in view ,the new government is thinking of taking measures to create a WIN-WIN situation where none is a loser nor a gainer.

In real life does such solution exist?

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

Chinese cosider Arunachal Pradesh their part still they issue visas in a stapled manner.

I sincerely wish that the two governments come to an amicable agreement

I just read that UAE had started issuing stapled visas to residents of Azad Kashmir in 2011.

An amicable settlement can only happen when either one gives up its claim or both give up their claims -- very difficult proposition at the moment.

In the absence of an amicable settlement there won't be peace in the SE Asia.

Peace can be ensured either by surrender or by being mightier than your neighbours. SE Asia has almost always been in turmoil and shall continue to be as there are too many players involved from West Asia and Central Asia. We have to be strong militarily and economically.

Keeping these key aspects in view ,the new government is thinking of taking measures to create a WIN-WIN situation where none is a loser nor a gainer.

In real life does such solution exist?

If it doesn't exist in real life, such policies are useless. Policies are meant to serve the interests of the people. Not for keeping them in Archives.

That is why PM's first foreign official visit is to Bhutan in order to counter China's vocal threat as there is a vast border line which has been with Bhutan of China and India can be beneficial with good Bhutan relationship.

The new foreign policy envisaged and framed by the new government will come in to operation in due course. Already talks with China started by the MEA. The outcome is awaited.

Now, deputy Pm of Russia will meet PM, there are some interesting developments as previous government failed to restore older ties with Russia and have turbulent relationship with CHina.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

Chinese cosider Arunachal Pradesh their part still they issue visas in a stapled manner.

The Chinese give a visa on a separate paper that may be stapled to passport. The normal practice is to endorse VISA on passport itself. As they consider Arunacal Prades residents as their own citizens, they do not recognize Indian passport and so issue VISA o a separate paper. Similarly, India considers residents of Azad Kashmir as India citizens and so VISA cannot be endorsed on Pakistani passport held by them. What India does? A visa on a separete paper (to be stapled) or endotrsement o Pakistani passport. If te visa is endorsed on passport, this will be inconsistent with Indian stand that Azad Kashmir is de jure Indian territory. I just wanted answer for my curiousity.

But it has been also been stated many times that India would be willing to convert cease fire line into international border and thus it may not like to have Azad Kashmir . My search on the net seems to indicate that visa is required to travel into India by AK people.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

Chinese cosider Arunachal Pradesh their part still they issue visas in a stapled manner.

The Chinese give a visa on a separate paper that may be stapled to passport. The normal practice is to endorse VISA on passport itself. As they consider Arunacal Prades residents as their own citizens, they do not recognize Indian passport and so issue VISA o a separate paper. Similarly, India considers residents of Azad Kashmir as India citizens and so VISA cannot be endorsed on Pakistani passport held by them. What India does? A visa on a separete paper (to be stapled) or endotrsement o Pakistani passport. If te visa is endorsed on passport, this will be inconsistent with Indian stand that Azad Kashmir is de jure Indian territory. I just wanted answer for my curiousity.

But it has been also been stated many times that India would be willing to convert cease fire line into international border and thus it may not like to have Azad Kashmir . My search on the net seems to indicate that visa is required to travel into India by AK people.

But is this endorsed on Passport issued by Pakistan Government? If so, India indirectly accepts Pakistan's claim on AK.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

Chinese cosider Arunachal Pradesh their part still they issue visas in a stapled manner.

The Chinese give a visa on a separate paper that may be stapled to passport. The normal practice is to endorse VISA on passport itself. As they consider Arunacal Prades residents as their own citizens, they do not recognize Indian passport and so issue VISA o a separate paper. Similarly, India considers residents of Azad Kashmir as India citizens and so VISA cannot be endorsed on Pakistani passport held by them. What India does? A visa on a separete paper (to be stapled) or endotrsement o Pakistani passport. If te visa is endorsed on passport, this will be inconsistent with Indian stand that Azad Kashmir is de jure Indian territory. I just wanted answer for my curiousity.

But it has been also been stated many times that India would be willing to convert cease fire line into international border and thus it may not like to have Azad Kashmir . My search on the net seems to indicate that visa is required to travel into India by AK people.

But is this endorsed on Passport issued by Pakistan Government? If so, India indirectly accepts Pakistan's claim on AK.

And if Pakistan is doing same to J&K citizens then they are also accepting India's claim. But visa is only an enabling facilitation. Obviously it does not affect each others claim. The Chinese have cleverly introduced a twist in it. But what is the message UAE gave when it issued stapled visas to Azad Kashmiris wanting to visit UAe. UAE is not an involved party.

The Chinese have bowled a googly at the new government in India. So far there is no response from our govt. They are cleverly sayong that it is a favour they are granting to J&K and Arunachal Pradesh residents if they want to travel to China instead of not granting them a visa at all. Self respect or Trade is the choice.

Actually they consider some parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh as part of China. So why issue visa to own citizens. Once, C.M. of Arunachal Pradesh was denied visa. after denial, Chinese embassy authorities told the C.M. that he could visit China whenever he liked. He needed no visa as no country would give visa to own citizens. Thus, stapled visa is definitely a compromise.

However, I wish to know the position of residents in Pak occupied Kashmir. Will our government issue visa to them? This is just for curiousity.

I think both sides of Kashmiris visit the other part of Kashmir in buses after getting visas.

India considers 'Azad Kashmir' part of J & K and thus the residents of Azad Kashmir are Indian. I wonder how India can give VISA to them.

Chinese cosider Arunachal Pradesh their part still they issue visas in a stapled manner.

The Chinese give a visa on a separate paper that may be stapled to passport. The normal practice is to endorse VISA on passport itself. As they consider Arunacal Prades residents as their own citizens, they do not recognize Indian passport and so issue VISA o a separate paper. Similarly, India considers residents of Azad Kashmir as India citizens and so VISA cannot be endorsed on Pakistani passport held by them. What India does? A visa on a separete paper (to be stapled) or endotrsement o Pakistani passport. If te visa is endorsed on passport, this will be inconsistent with Indian stand that Azad Kashmir is de jure Indian territory. I just wanted answer for my curiousity.

But it has been also been stated many times that India would be willing to convert cease fire line into international border and thus it may not like to have Azad Kashmir . My search on the net seems to indicate that visa is required to travel into India by AK people.

But is this endorsed on Passport issued by Pakistan Government? If so, India indirectly accepts Pakistan's claim on AK.

And if Pakistan is doing same to J&K citizens then they are also accepting India's claim. But visa is only an enabling facilitation. Obviously it does not affect each others claim. The Chinese have cleverly introduced a twist in it. But what is the message UAE gave when it issued stapled visas to Azad Kashmiris wanting to visit UAe. UAE is not an involved party.

Thanks for your valuable inputs. Practically, J & K is in India and A.K. in Pakistan. Recognizing this reality while issuing VISA is right action.