13 years ago
Jump to Forum..
- Boddunan.com Updates
- - Announcements
- - Contests & Rewards
- - Group Discussions
- Discussions
- - General Discussions
- - Improving English Writing Skills
- - Q n A - Find answers to your questions
- - Daily Dose
- - Topics of Interest
- - - Current Affairs & Latest News
- - - Education & Learning
- - - Humor & Jokes
- - - Movies & Entertainment
- Your Vote Counts
- - Feedback
- - Suggestion Box
- Shoutbox
- - Introduce Yourself
- - The Lounge
- - Help
- - Testimonials
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
13 years ago
When the disturbance exceeds the limits , presidential rule will be imposed.
Visit my blogs:
http://abidareacode.blogspot.com
13 years ago
Yes, it must be if the state govt fails to ride the turbulence since it is in the public interest and any unfavorable misshappening can be averted.
Arise Awake and Rest Not till the Goal is Achieved.
13 years ago
Personally I don't think the situation is as such that applying president rule is the only option left for us rather in future it might be a good option when things go beyond control....
13 years ago
Any state can be brought under President rule if it is not possible to run the state administration in accordance with constitution. There is no specific provision for disturbed state. It is responsibility of state government to maintain law and order. If state government requests, central forces and army may be depolyed in the area. President rule is not necessary for solving problem of disturbed area.
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
13 years ago
it cannot disturb the states .May be it can improve their conditions.
You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.
Related Topics