15 years ago
Jump to Forum..
- Boddunan.com Updates
- - Announcements
- - Contests & Rewards
- - Group Discussions
- Discussions
- - General Discussions
- - Improving English Writing Skills
- - Q n A - Find answers to your questions
- - Daily Dose
- - Topics of Interest
- - - Current Affairs & Latest News
- - - Education & Learning
- - - Humor & Jokes
- - - Movies & Entertainment
- Your Vote Counts
- - Feedback
- - Suggestion Box
- Shoutbox
- - Introduce Yourself
- - The Lounge
- - Help
- - Testimonials
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
15 years ago
I do not agree with negative vote. Negative vote is a vote for anarchy. The objective of voting is to elect legislators and enable formation of government. Negative vote means that all candidates are rejected. The negative voter has no role accept to say that he likes no one. A government has to be run by 'some one' and not by 'no one'. If you do not like any candidate, you should take initiative to bring forward some candidate whom you like.
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
15 years ago
vijay,
Though negative vote can be implemented it is not going to help society in any way and many people may misuse their voting rights. The result can be not known whom to elect..
Though negative vote can be implemented it is not going to help society in any way and many people may misuse their voting rights. The result can be not known whom to elect..
15 years ago
I think rather than this negative vote people should have a right to analyse the performance of their elected member once in a year or twice in a year and have a right to call them back.
Visit my blogs:
http://abidareacode.blogspot.com
15 years ago
I agree with Gulshan and Abid. Rather than wasting energy and resources on negative voting, it is better to first analyze who the right candidate is and then vote accordingly!
"I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally."
- W. C. Fields :)
15 years ago
In that case Election commitee should public all the form fill by such candidate..
which show their earning,property,criminal record,in paper..
We see thier property in paper but no paper reflect their criminal record...how would u anaylse then..
which show their earning,property,criminal record,in paper..
We see thier property in paper but no paper reflect their criminal record...how would u anaylse then..
15 years ago
Its a good suggestion. thus we can know the view of people on all the candidate.
Get hot offers& tricks for Indians..Hurry!!
www.IndianOffer.blogspot.com
15 years ago
The real issue is that people do not vote on a candidate's performance but on basis of caste and other narrow considerations. some times, even a known criminal contesting from jail is elected. If people are vigilant, right candidates will be elected.
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
15 years ago
In that case each voter will have to be provided two votes one with which he can give negative vote to party not working and another to elect the party he wants.
You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.
Related Topics