The idea does sound quite idealistic and Utopian and that is the problem. A perfect Utopia does not exist. While the idea of one humanity and one world etc is attractive, it is practically, feasibly impossible. To begin with, the problem is its diversity, each country has its own set of cultural values, ethnic values etc. which, no matter how hard a person from outside may try to understand, those values will remain alien to him. So it is practically impossible to have such a Utopia.

I agree. That is why I favor 'one humanity' in my profile. The concept is not Utopian. We shall have national governments also just as now we have central government, state governments and local bodies. The world government will be just above these for dealing with international matters. The existing United Nations Organization is also loosely speaking world government. .

UNO is not a world government, it is pawn of five nations.

It may be a pawn of five nations but the idea is of a government that will function like UNO but with more fairness!

I agree. That is why I favor 'one humanity' in my profile. The concept is not Utopian. We shall have national governments also just as now we have central government, state governments and local bodies. The world government will be just above these for dealing with international matters. The existing United Nations Organization is also loosely speaking world government. .

UNO is not a world government, it is pawn of five nations.

It may be a pawn of five nations but the idea is of a government that will function like UNO but with more fairness!

It is not possible. Some country of world not believed in democracy.

The idea does sound quite idealistic and Utopian and that is the problem. A perfect Utopia does not exist. While the idea of one humanity and one world etc is attractive, it is practically, feasibly impossible. To begin with, the problem is its diversity, each country has its own set of cultural values, ethnic values etc. which, no matter how hard a person from outside may try to understand, those values will remain alien to him. So it is practically impossible to have such a Utopia.

I agree, it is simply not possible to have one world government since there are too many diversities that gives rise to complications...

Well, I feel that if a one world government comes into existence it can look into issues like attack of one country by another, war and aggression and dominance on one country by another, global terrorism, impact of worldwide pollution on the planet and steps to save the planet, scanning the policies of all nations as per international laws to see if they are complying with international rules, eradication of poverty in undeveloped countries, developing schemes which will make migration of people from highly populated countries to scarcely populated countries easier so that there is a uniform population worldwide etc. All these are major issues these days. People say that the UNO is a body looking into such things, but the UN is a powerless body and not an international or one world government.

Once upon a time before India become a country, were just a bunch of states/small kingdoms constantly warring against each other. One fine day we realized that we needed to unite and to shed petty differences, which would be good for all states/kingdoms. It was then that we united and became a 'nation' or country. The same process happened in other countries as well. Now we see that the same thing is happening nation to nation. Nations continue to war against nations based on petty differences. Wouldn't it be good if all the countries of the world unite, just as small states once united to form a nation? Wouldn't it be good if all countries unite under a 'one world government'? this would lead to peace worldwide and solve a lot of problems that we see today. Do you think this concept is utopia?

Once upon a time before India become a country, were just a bunch of states/small kingdoms constantly warring against each other. One fine day we realized that we needed to unite and to shed petty differences, which would be good for all states/kingdoms. It was then that we united and became a 'nation' or country. The same process happened in other countries as well. Now we see that the same thing is happening nation to nation. Nations continue to war against nations based on petty differences. Wouldn't it be good if all the countries of the world unite, just as small states once united to form a nation? Wouldn't it be good if all countries unite under a 'one world government'? this would lead to peace worldwide and solve a lot of problems that we see today. Do you think this concept is utopia?

I wish we could have one but judging by present state of affairs I don't harbor any such "Utopian" hopes! If Koreans divided under two nations with one threatening the other with nuclear annihilation how can we entertain such grandiose aspirations? I think the biggest hurdle lying on this path is politics and politicians!!