The sequence of events of the last few days has led to establishment of fast-track courts but what about quality of justice? The bane of this country is judicial sloth deliberately produced out of corruption in the process. Collusive understanding between lawyers and other forms of corruption are killing the litigants! Justice delayed is justice denied but justice hurried is justice buried!
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
Social justice will be possible only if the entire concept of politico-social order is followed, where no one is exploited, where every one is liberated and where every one is equal and free from Hunger and poverty. The proverb ‘Justice Delayed is Justice Denied’ is proved as it is denied to the poorest of the poor. Providing basic necessities to them will amount to Justice because the definition of justice varies from individuals to individuals on the basis of its economic conditions. The situation today is so grim that if a poor is able to reach to the stage of a high court, it should be considered as an achievement.

Judiciary obviously owes an obligation to deliver quick and inexpensive justice irrespective of the complicated procedures but it cannot be hurried to be buried. Cases should be decided for imparting justice not for the sake of its disposal. Secondly, Arbitration procedure must be utilized as a better option for quick disposal of cases. Finally, to conclude with the words of Lord Hewet as it is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.

atulb@boddunan.com
Thank you said by: chinmoymukherjee
Social justice will be possible only if the entire concept of politico-social order is followed, where no one is exploited, where every one is liberated and where every one is equal and free from Hunger and poverty. The proverb ‘Justice Delayed is Justice Denied’ is proved as it is denied to the poorest of the poor. Providing basic necessities to them will amount to Justice because the definition of justice varies from individuals to individuals on the basis of its economic conditions. The situation today is so grim that if a poor is able to reach to the stage of a high court, it should be considered as an achievement.

Judiciary obviously owes an obligation to deliver quick and inexpensive justice irrespective of the complicated procedures but it cannot be hurried to be buried. Cases should be decided for imparting justice not for the sake of its disposal. Secondly, Arbitration procedure must be utilized as a better option for quick disposal of cases. Finally, to conclude with the words of Lord Hewet as it is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.


Great thoughts,Atul! In Indian constitution - the great document the contents of which sadly very few of our current members of Parliament and members of State legislatures bother themselves to read and comprehend. There a is separate chapter entitled 'Directive Principles of State Policy' which are not of mandatory kind like 'Fundamental Rights' but these underline the vision of our founding fathers of the constitution. Today we come across cases where rapist or hardened criminals get away with bail to commit the same crimes!!
Justice should neither be delayed nor hurried. It is necessary that the court proceedings are quicker and very few adjournments. There must be proper opportunity to the accused to defend himself. The prosecution should be required to produce irrefutable evidence. The proceedings should be quick but no short cut.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

now police stations in Kerala are called Janamaitri police stations and accused people are to be treated as guests in police stations according to rules, till they are proved guilty. they should be treated well, give chairs to sit etc....Yesterday I saw a movie where police men and two prisoners are having supper together. Isn't it comedy????

Meera sandhu
Social justice will be possible only if the entire concept of politico-social order is followed, where no one is exploited, where every one is liberated and where every one is equal and free from Hunger and poverty. The proverb ‘Justice Delayed is Justice Denied’ is proved as it is denied to the poorest of the poor. Providing basic necessities to them will amount to Justice because the definition of justice varies from individuals to individuals on the basis of its economic conditions. The situation today is so grim that if a poor is able to reach to the stage of a high court, it should be considered as an achievement.

Judiciary obviously owes an obligation to deliver quick and inexpensive justice irrespective of the complicated procedures but it cannot be hurried to be buried. Cases should be decided for imparting justice not for the sake of its disposal. Secondly, Arbitration procedure must be utilized as a better option for quick disposal of cases. Finally, to conclude with the words of Lord Hewet as it is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.


Great thoughts,Atul! In Indian constitution - the great document the contents of which sadly very few of our current members of Parliament and members of State legislatures bother themselves to read and comprehend. There a is separate chapter entitled 'Directive Principles of State Policy' which are not of mandatory kind like 'Fundamental Rights' but these underline the vision of our founding fathers of the constitution. Today we come across cases where rapist or hardened criminals get away with bail to commit the same crimes!!


Until the time it is money that is important everywhere, this will keep happening. When people like Salman Khan who get drunk and kill homeless people sleeping on pavements, he still gets to walk away free and do his work of earning crores of rupees for his every single movie. Whereas the people who got killed left their families behind them trying to live a hand-to-mouth existence on the footpaths of Mumbai or some city, not getting anything to eat on some days mostly! what kind of justice is this? :blink:

And who cares about The Constitution? It is only to be talked about when some cartoonist draws an inflammable picture of it in desperation to attract attention to all the wrong goings on, otherwise I doubt if there is even a single politician who knows what is exactly written in it!

"I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally."
- W. C. Fields :)

Social justice will be possible only if the entire concept of politico-social order is followed, where no one is exploited, where every one is liberated and where every one is equal and free from Hunger and poverty. The proverb ‘Justice Delayed is Justice Denied’ is proved as it is denied to the poorest of the poor. Providing basic necessities to them will amount to Justice because the definition of justice varies from individuals to individuals on the basis of its economic conditions. The situation today is so grim that if a poor is able to reach to the stage of a high court, it should be considered as an achievement.

Judiciary obviously owes an obligation to deliver quick and inexpensive justice irrespective of the complicated procedures but it cannot be hurried to be buried. Cases should be decided for imparting justice not for the sake of its disposal. Secondly, Arbitration procedure must be utilized as a better option for quick disposal of cases. Finally, to conclude with the words of Lord Hewet as it is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.


Great thoughts,Atul! In Indian constitution - the great document the contents of which sadly very few of our current members of Parliament and members of State legislatures bother themselves to read and comprehend. There a is separate chapter entitled 'Directive Principles of State Policy' which are not of mandatory kind like 'Fundamental Rights' but these underline the vision of our founding fathers of the constitution. Today we come across cases where rapist or hardened criminals get away with bail to commit the same crimes!!


Until the time it is money that is important everywhere, this will keep happening. When people like Salman Khan who get drunk and kill homeless people sleeping on pavements, he still gets to walk away free and do his work of earning crores of rupees for his every single movie. Whereas the people who got killed left their families behind them trying to live a hand-to-mouth existence on the footpaths of Mumbai or some city, not getting anything to eat on some days mostly! what kind of justice is this? :blink:

And who cares about The Constitution? It is only to be talked about when some cartoonist draws an inflammable picture of it in desperation to attract attention to all the wrong goings on, otherwise I doubt if there is even a single politician who knows what is exactly written in it!


Law is like a net that can catch fish but not crocodiles. It is best to get strong and inspire others to get strong. The ultimate law is 'survival of the fittest'. Be fittest and inspire others to be fittest. This means physical, mental and emotional fitness.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

Social justice will be possible only if the entire concept of politico-social order is followed, where no one is exploited, where every one is liberated and where every one is equal and free from Hunger and poverty. The proverb ‘Justice Delayed is Justice Denied’ is proved as it is denied to the poorest of the poor. Providing basic necessities to them will amount to Justice because the definition of justice varies from individuals to individuals on the basis of its economic conditions. The situation today is so grim that if a poor is able to reach to the stage of a high court, it should be considered as an achievement.

Judiciary obviously owes an obligation to deliver quick and inexpensive justice irrespective of the complicated procedures but it cannot be hurried to be buried. Cases should be decided for imparting justice not for the sake of its disposal. Secondly, Arbitration procedure must be utilized as a better option for quick disposal of cases. Finally, to conclude with the words of Lord Hewet as it is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.


Great thoughts,Atul! In Indian constitution - the great document the contents of which sadly very few of our current members of Parliament and members of State legislatures bother themselves to read and comprehend. There a is separate chapter entitled 'Directive Principles of State Policy' which are not of mandatory kind like 'Fundamental Rights' but these underline the vision of our founding fathers of the constitution. Today we come across cases where rapist or hardened criminals get away with bail to commit the same crimes!!


Until the time it is money that is important everywhere, this will keep happening. When people like Salman Khan who get drunk and kill homeless people sleeping on pavements, he still gets to walk away free and do his work of earning crores of rupees for his every single movie. Whereas the people who got killed left their families behind them trying to live a hand-to-mouth existence on the footpaths of Mumbai or some city, not getting anything to eat on some days mostly! what kind of justice is this? :blink:

And who cares about The Constitution? It is only to be talked about when some cartoonist draws an inflammable picture of it in desperation to attract attention to all the wrong goings on, otherwise I doubt if there is even a single politician who knows what is exactly written in it!


Law is like a net that can catch fish but not crocodiles. It is best to get strong and inspire others to get strong. The ultimate law is 'survival of the fittest'. Be fittest and inspire others to be fittest. This means physical, mental and emotional fitness.


True!! But when that same law allows people with money and power to walk away freely with a huge load of several crimes, then it is the time to get up and get our act together and work to close such loopholes that allow rapists and murderers to walk away. It is indeed needed for everyone to get strong but in a country where strength is measured only in terms of money and the power to bully others to meek submission, it is time that the law be changed. Unless there is a strong willpower and some political backing it will not happen.

A good example I would like to give, recently when I was in Mandu, the manager was a very friendly person and he was talking to use on many issues. He told us that in big cities like Indore and Bhopal, the hooliganism had reached such peaks that everywhere there was a sense of fear and common people could not breathe freely. Then the police had enough of it and they rounded up all the well known criminals, their big shots etc. and marched them publicly in a huge procession while beating them severely with sticks. Most of these criminals had powerful connections with politicians and most of them were wanted in murders and rape cases. This public humiliation and beating went on for more than a month and after that the message from police was clear, and crime rate really went down!!

"I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally."
- W. C. Fields :)

Anything accomplished (Completed) in hurry won't be the best usually. Before giving justice it needs to be analysed thoroughly.

Born to express, not to impress.
http://royalrobsideas.blogspot.in/
Law is like a net that can catch fish but not crocodiles. It is best to get strong and inspire others to get strong. The ultimate law is 'survival of the fittest'. Be fittest and inspire others to be fittest. This means physical, mental and emotional fitness.[/quote]

Are you making this statement in Indian context? It is worth remembering here that one of the most powerful and megalomaniac presidents of the United States,Nixon was laid low and put in the doghouse till his last breath by the US Supreme Court for his role in the Watergate scandal!
You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.