20 Replies
I think you have given a lot of time in articles and still got rejected and that is making you frustrated and angry.
You are now very popular by copying 4 articles in a single day...lol
And fighting for the 5 self written article. Definitely editors will get tired if someone has copied 4 articles because it is not an easy job.
Also you sound little commanding you should request to recheck the 5th articles by apologizing about the past 4 articles.
You are now very popular by copying 4 articles in a single day...lol
And fighting for the 5 self written article. Definitely editors will get tired if someone has copied 4 articles because it is not an easy job.
Also you sound little commanding you should request to recheck the 5th articles by apologizing about the past 4 articles.
Disputes cannot be always avoided as no body including editors are infallible. However, I feel that there is nothing like absolute originality. even if you think independently and write in your own words, the relevant matter or ideas would still be already available in books. For example, if I write an article on 'Price mechanism in free market economy', and do not visit any site, still the matter written by me treated as copied. Only verbatim copying should be discouraged. The rules for editing should also be made clear so that nobody unduly suffers.
JS- you say that copying is not crime. Intentional copy and paste is definitely against the rules and harms the site. If you have actually copied, you should not press the matter further even if you do not wish to apologize as suggested by Rakesh. I do not support copying as such. I also indicated a possibility that even your original thoughts may be already on the web and this should not be considered copying.
Well JS... you accepted that you copied other articles.. I told why editors rejected.. And there is no point in discussing further. As a violation of boddunan terms I can block your account.
I was initially thought of ignoring your arrogant post but replid to say boddunan editors are transparent. If you are not satisfied, delete your articles and post in other websites.
I was initially thought of ignoring your arrogant post but replid to say boddunan editors are transparent. If you are not satisfied, delete your articles and post in other websites.
The whole controversy is being allowed to drag on and now it has taken on a messy turn. I personally would have preferred a pm to sort it out and discretion also demands it. But now JS wants substantiation of the charge of copying against him in the forum. Why boddunan is not coming out more openly to clear the air. It is neither desirable nor acceptable that a serious allegation of this nature should remain unproved. Let it be a precedent for other contributors of articles too. There should not be any grey area, if someone is guilty he or she has to face the consequences. On the other if boddunan has not played the game fair, let it own it up. Please end this controversy!
I don't know about the problem so far, but Boddunan says in colored, bold text about copying and originality of an article, each time you submit article.When you have deliberately submitted articles knowing they are copied from other sources, there is no point in finding justice(you know about copyrights! right!? I don't think you realise how serious copyright infringement can be)
Also the question you've put forward is correct(atleast regd to the article review)- a proper reason must have been given for the article rejection claims.
Hope this problem is resolved soon-for the site to be of any good value, originality of content is very essential :(
Also the question you've put forward is correct(atleast regd to the article review)- a proper reason must have been given for the article rejection claims.
Hope this problem is resolved soon-for the site to be of any good value, originality of content is very essential :(
@Thirukumaran
You have very rightly drawn the attention to the legal aspect of it.But my submission is for a firm stand on the part of boddunan in this regard.This controversy is highly unedifying and demoralizing.The sites receives so many articles from members and I myself contributed almost 200 articles and such an unfortunate situation has not been experienced.As to the conduct of the member I am very sad to say that it is simply not acceptable.
You have very rightly drawn the attention to the legal aspect of it.But my submission is for a firm stand on the part of boddunan in this regard.This controversy is highly unedifying and demoralizing.The sites receives so many articles from members and I myself contributed almost 200 articles and such an unfortunate situation has not been experienced.As to the conduct of the member I am very sad to say that it is simply not acceptable.
Topic Author
S
Sameer
@jyoti08
Topic Stats
Created
Wednesday, 24 February 2010 00:57
Last Updated
Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies
0
Views
2.3K
Likes
0