With a view to control damage resulting from outburst of Congress Vice President against an ordnance, Sonia Gandhi has emphaticall asserted that the whole party is solidly behind Man Mohan singh. This is a good rebuff to detractors.
However the Congress functionaries need to refrain from using impolite language even when the disagree.
In a bid to shield the PM, congress in a panick, exhibiting more and more of its foolishness. Ajay Makan questions Modi's Nationalim. He alleges Modi believed the story of a Pakistani journalist instead of an Indian journalist. What a flimsy and lame cause !!! What maken wants is Modi should believe an Indian journalist whatever nonsense he writes. If Modi believes an Indian journalist, he's a great Nationalist. What a great rationale !!!
Congress proved again that it's bunch made of Jokers.
In fact, no journalist- Indian or Pakistani can be relied upon. We should rely upon only the statement that a leader- Indian or Pakistani- gives directly in press conference or in a joint communique. Modi simply m3ddled with international affairs on half baked and unauthentic information. The fascists are known for arousing sentiments on mere slogans and half truths- half lies.
This fundamental knowledge of talking to press directly should clear the misunderstandings. But Ajay Maken as a leader talked with the press. Instead of clearing the misunderstandings, he has issued a childish statement that Modi lacks Nationalism. And the reason he has given is silly and foolish. Is it the way of deciding one's Nationalism ?
Modi himself state that he is 'Hindu nationalist'. This means that he is not 'Indian nationalist'. Can there be Hindu, Muslim or christian nationalism. Not being an 'Indian nationalist' and being simply 'Hindu nationalist' as Modi himself says, he certainly lacks 'nationalism' viz. 'Indian nationalism'. Makan is perfectly correct.
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
With a view to control damage resulting from outburst of Congress Vice President against an ordnance, Sonia Gandhi has emphaticall asserted that the whole party is solidly behind Man Mohan singh. This is a good rebuff to detractors.
However the Congress functionaries need to refrain from using impolite language even when the disagree.
In a bid to shield the PM, congress in a panick, exhibiting more and more of its foolishness. Ajay Makan questions Modi's Nationalim. He alleges Modi believed the story of a Pakistani journalist instead of an Indian journalist. What a flimsy and lame cause !!! What maken wants is Modi should believe an Indian journalist whatever nonsense he writes. If Modi believes an Indian journalist, he's a great Nationalist. What a great rationale !!!
Congress proved again that it's bunch made of Jokers.
In fact, no journalist- Indian or Pakistani can be relied upon. We should rely upon only the statement that a leader- Indian or Pakistani- gives directly in press conference or in a joint communique. Modi simply m3ddled with international affairs on half baked and unauthentic information. The fascists are known for arousing sentiments on mere slogans and half truths- half lies.
This fundamental knowledge of talking to press directly should clear the misunderstandings. But Ajay Maken as a leader talked with the press. Instead of clearing the misunderstandings, he has issued a childish statement that Modi lacks Nationalism. And the reason he has given is silly and foolish. Is it the way of deciding one's Nationalism ?
Modi himself state that he is 'Hindu nationalist'. This means that he is not 'Indian nationalist'. Can there be Hindu, Muslim or christian nationalism. Not being an 'Indian nationalist' and being simply 'Hindu nationalist' as Modi himself says, he certainly lacks 'nationalism' viz. 'Indian nationalism'. Makan is perfectly correct.
Allama Iqbal said, "sare Jahan se achcha Hindustan Hamara." what's Hindustan if not India ? When Modi said, he is Hindu nationalist, he meant Indian nationalist. Makan should know that if Modi is not a nationalist, nobody is a nationalist.
With a view to control damage resulting from outburst of Congress Vice President against an ordnance, Sonia Gandhi has emphaticall asserted that the whole party is solidly behind Man Mohan singh. This is a good rebuff to detractors.
However the Congress functionaries need to refrain from using impolite language even when the disagree.
In a bid to shield the PM, congress in a panick, exhibiting more and more of its foolishness. Ajay Makan questions Modi's Nationalim. He alleges Modi believed the story of a Pakistani journalist instead of an Indian journalist. What a flimsy and lame cause !!! What maken wants is Modi should believe an Indian journalist whatever nonsense he writes. If Modi believes an Indian journalist, he's a great Nationalist. What a great rationale !!!
Congress proved again that it's bunch made of Jokers.
In fact, no journalist- Indian or Pakistani can be relied upon. We should rely upon only the statement that a leader- Indian or Pakistani- gives directly in press conference or in a joint communique. Modi simply m3ddled with international affairs on half baked and unauthentic information. The fascists are known for arousing sentiments on mere slogans and half truths- half lies.
This fundamental knowledge of talking to press directly should clear the misunderstandings. But Ajay Maken as a leader talked with the press. Instead of clearing the misunderstandings, he has issued a childish statement that Modi lacks Nationalism. And the reason he has given is silly and foolish. Is it the way of deciding one's Nationalism ?
Modi himself state that he is 'Hindu nationalist'. This means that he is not 'Indian nationalist'. Can there be Hindu, Muslim or christian nationalism. Not being an 'Indian nationalist' and being simply 'Hindu nationalist' as Modi himself says, he certainly lacks 'nationalism' viz. 'Indian nationalism'. Makan is perfectly correct.
Allama Iqbal said, "sare Jahan se achcha Hindustan Hamara." what's Hindustan if not India ? When Modi said, he is Hindu nationalist, he meant Indian nationalist. Makan should know that if Modi is not a nationalist, nobody is a nationalist.
Matter of fact "India" came into existence only after British came. That means no one was nationalist before that.
I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work
With a view to control damage resulting from outburst of Congress Vice President against an ordnance, Sonia Gandhi has emphaticall asserted that the whole party is solidly behind Man Mohan singh. This is a good rebuff to detractors.
However the Congress functionaries need to refrain from using impolite language even when the disagree.
In a bid to shield the PM, congress in a panick, exhibiting more and more of its foolishness. Ajay Makan questions Modi's Nationalim. He alleges Modi believed the story of a Pakistani journalist instead of an Indian journalist. What a flimsy and lame cause !!! What maken wants is Modi should believe an Indian journalist whatever nonsense he writes. If Modi believes an Indian journalist, he's a great Nationalist. What a great rationale !!!
Congress proved again that it's bunch made of Jokers.
In fact, no journalist- Indian or Pakistani can be relied upon. We should rely upon only the statement that a leader- Indian or Pakistani- gives directly in press conference or in a joint communique. Modi simply m3ddled with international affairs on half baked and unauthentic information. The fascists are known for arousing sentiments on mere slogans and half truths- half lies.
This fundamental knowledge of talking to press directly should clear the misunderstandings. But Ajay Maken as a leader talked with the press. Instead of clearing the misunderstandings, he has issued a childish statement that Modi lacks Nationalism. And the reason he has given is silly and foolish. Is it the way of deciding one's Nationalism ?
Modi himself state that he is 'Hindu nationalist'. This means that he is not 'Indian nationalist'. Can there be Hindu, Muslim or christian nationalism. Not being an 'Indian nationalist' and being simply 'Hindu nationalist' as Modi himself says, he certainly lacks 'nationalism' viz. 'Indian nationalism'. Makan is perfectly correct.
It is misconstrued, he said he is born Hindu and the word nationalist attached with Hindu shows that he is nationalist, and it is in a way saying India is first, every nationalist irrespective of religion fund of India, I think Muslim nationalist who loves India, and so on, On the other hand, I was surprised by Congress's peculiar handling of situation, it proves that their think tank lacks some thing other wise this mess would not happen, announcing on press does not give votes, as before canibet discussion this ordinance passed by congress core committee headed by Sonia, Gandhi, Ahmed Pate, PM, Shinde, Chidambaram, Antony and they passed this ordinance, and only when President objects, this press club of India oratory comes, I think majority of people who follow politics can understand the fallacy and duplicity in this drama.
